TUDOR ENGLAND’S DITHERING DICTATOR MAGAZINE BRITAIN’S BESTSELLING HISTORY RY MAGAZINE
April 2017 • www.historyextra.com yextra.com
CHARLES II The Merry Monarch’s Revolution THE HISTORY GENDER GAP
“Expertise is not just a man in a suit anymore” Raleigh: The bicycle that spoke to a nation
America’s First Wo ld Wa U u n
Did the Victorians ruin the world?
1980s nuclear nightmares
The Nazi next door: Britain’s PoW camps
Expert-led journeys into the past Discover nine centuries of history through single study days and full-length tours, in the UK and across the globe.
Beyond the Pillars of Hercules with Jason Webster
The Face Of Evil with Nigel Jones In this tour exploring the darkest episodes of German history, we trace the rise and fall of the Third Reich. Presented as the salvation of a Germany exhausted by war and depression, it instead unleashed the horror of the Holocaust and plunged the nation back into war.
The late 15th century saw Spain burst wide open, creating a trans-global empire the likes of which the world had never seen. We pay a visit to the land of Cortés and Columbus, who were quickly making their mark on a New World. £2,495 MRGP¾MKLXW£350 WMRKPIWYTT 1SRXL¯1SRRH1E]
HISTORICAL
£2,495 MRGP¾MKLXW£245 WMRKPIWYTT 7EXXL¯7YRXL.YRI
TRIPS The Final Solution with Roger Moorhouse
THE HISTORY THAT SHAPED US
The Loire Châteaux with Dr Michael Jones & Lys Hall
Join us on a journey to the epicentre of the Second World War. From opening shots in Gdańsk, to the eventual liberation of a host of nightmarish death camps, Poland experienced the conflict to its full murderous extent.
The fertile Loire Valley has long nurtured not just France’s noble families, but also its prized vines, as we discover on this History & Wine tour. Our journey through central France is a feast of stories, sites and sumptuous wines.
£1,995 MRGP¾MKLXW£225 WMRKPIWYTT 7EXWX¯7EXXL.YP]
£2,445 MRGPGSEGLERHJIVV]£245 WMRKPIWYTT 7YRVH¯7EXXL7ITXIQFIV
For more information or request a brochure: 5249
Call: 01722 713820
•
Email: [emailprotected]
•
Visit: www.historicaltrips.com
APRIL 2017
WELCOME
ON THE COVER: PORTRAIT OF CHARLES II (1630-85) – BRIDGEMAN, ARMED SOLDIERS MARCHING – GETTY IMAGES, AMERICAN FLAG – DREAMSTIME.COM. THIS PAGE: STEVE SAYERS – THESECRETSTUDIO.NET
When we think of the defining dates in English and British history, years such as 1066, 1649 and 1914 often spring to mind. But should we also be adding 1660 to that list? That is the view of historian Ian Mortimer who argues that the restoration of Charles II had implications far beyond the upper echelons of power. All of society, he believes, was transformed by the return of the monarchy. You can explore his arguments in our cover feature, which begins on page 35. Across the Atlantic, one of the most important dates of recent times was 1917 when the United States entered the First World War and began the process that led to it becoming the dominant global player of the past century. On the centenary of this momentous decision, Adam IP Smith revisits the fierce internal debates in the US about the merits of joining a European war. His piece begins on page 22. A few weeks ago, the history Twitter community was abuzz with a discussion about the under-representation of women in history magazines and popular history more generally. It’s an area we felt we wanted to explore more fully and so we convened a panel of leading female historians to share their views on this topic. That piece begins on page 46, and an extended version will be airing on our podcast soon. It’s a debate that’s set to continue, so please do share your views with us on women’s roles in popular and academic history. Rob Attar Editor
MAGAZINE historyextra.com The website of BBC History Magazine
Weekly podcast Download episodes for free from iTunes and other providers, or via our website: historyextra.com/ podcasts
Our digital editions BBC History Magazine is available for the Kindle, Kindle Fire, iPad/iPhone, Google Play and Zinio. Find us in your app store or visit the website: historyextra.com/digital
Facebook and Twitter twitter.com/historyextra facebook.com/historyextra
World Histories Check out the new bimonthly global history magazine, produced by the BBC History Magazine team.
You can order issue 3 at buysubscriptions.com/ worldhistories or call us on 0844 844 0250**
BSME Editor of the Year 2015, Special Interest Brand
Collector’s Edition: The Story of the Tudors Read our guide to the rulers of the 16th century. Buy it for £9.99 – subscribers get free UK P+P*. Order at buysubscriptions.com/ special-editions/ the-story-of-the-tudors or call us on 0844 844 0250**
THIS ISSUE’S CONTRIBUTORS
CONTACT US Jonathan Hogg The 1980s is a fascinating period for contemporary historians. In a world where nuclear weapons still exist, I am interested in tracing their social, cultural and political roots.
Jonathan explores the impact of nuclear tensions on 1980s culture on page 50
Janina Ramirez History is a subject bursting out of the seams. There’s a new generation of women’s voices coming through with some really refreshing new research, which is incredibly exciting.
Read our interview with four leading female historians on page 46
Ian Mortimer The late 17th century fascinates everyone who studies it. There were so many fundamental changes – it can seem both modern and medieval at once.
Ian takes us back to the seismic events of 1660 on page 35
*Subscribers to BBC History Magazinee receive FREE UK P&P on this collector’s edition. Prices including postage are: £11.49 for all other UK residents, £12.99 for Europe and £13.49 for Rest of World. All orders subject to availability. Please allow up to 21 days for delivery **Calls will cost 7p per minute plus your telephone company’s access charge. Lines are open 8am–8pm weekdays & 9am–1pm Saturday
PHONE Subscriptions & back issues 0844 844 0250 – Those with impaired hearing can call Minicom 01795 414561 Editorial 0117 314 7377 EMAIL Subscriptions & back issues [emailprotected] Editorial [emailprotected] POST Subscriptions & back issues BBC History Magazine, PO Box 279, Sittingbourne, Kent ME9 8DF Basic annual subscription rates: UK: £40, Eire/Europe: £67, ROW: £69 Editorial BBC History Magazine, Immediate Media Company Bristol Limited, Tower House, Fairfax Street, Bristol BS1 3BN In the US/Canada you can contact us at: PO Box 37495, Boone, IA 50037 BHIcustserv@cdsfulfillment.com, britsubs.com/history, Toll-free 800-342-3592
3
APRIL 2017
CONTENTS Features
Every month
30 The British cycling revolution
6 ANNIVERSARIES
11 HISTORY NOW 11 The latest history news 14 Backgrounder: the National Front 16 Past notes: British Summer Time
18 LETTERS 21 MICHAEL WOOD’S VIEW 28 OUR FIRST WORLD WAR
75 BOOKS The latest releases reviewed, plus Simon Thurley discusses his book on the great Tudor houses France and the rise of the right – is another outlier about to shake politics? See page 14
87 TV & RADIO The pick of new history programmes
22 When America joined WWI Adam IP Smith traces the dramatic policy U-turn that pushed the USA into entering the ‘European war’
30 The rise of British cycling Steve Humphries takes us through 130 years of Raleigh bicycles
35 Charles II’s revolution Ian Mortimer on how the re-establishment of the monarchy in 1660 was one of British history’s most seismic moments
90 OUT & ABOUT 90 History Explorer: Eden PoW camp 95 Five things to do in April 96 My favourite place: Verona
101 MISCELLANY 101 Q&A and quiz 102 Samantha’s recipe corner 103 Prize crossword
106 MY HISTORY HERO TV presenter Saira Khan picks Pakistan’s former PM Benazir Bhutto
Kat Arney gives us four examples of when the Victorian drive for progress went wrong
46 Women historians
44 SUBSCRIBE Save when you subscribe today
Four leading historians tell us about their experiences as women working in the field and the challenges they face
50 The nuclear 1980s Jonathan Hogg reflects on how the nuclear threat influenced pop, literature, comedy and films in the 1980s
54 The dithering dictator Derek Wilson charts the dramatic rise and fall of the Tudor Lord Protector, Edward Seymour
4
USPS Identification Statement BBC HISTORY (ISSN 1469-8552) (USPS 024-177) April 2017 is published 13 times a year under licence from BBC Worldwide by Immediate Media Company Bristol Ltd, Tower House, Fairfax Street, Bristol BS1 3BN, UK. Distributed in the US by Circulation Specialists, Inc., 2 Corporate Drive, Suite 945, Shelton CT 06484-6238. Periodicals postage paid at Shelton, CT and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to BBC HISTORY MAGAZINE, PO Box 37495, Boone, IA 50037-0495.
GETTY/SHUTTERSTOCK/ALAMY/ALAMY/BRIDGEMAN/FOTOLIBRA
42 Victorian blunders
46 What’s it like for women working in history? 42 How the Victorians ruined the world
BBC History Magazine
54 Downfall of a dictator: the story of Edward VI’s Lord Protector
22 The U-turn that brought the USA into the First World War
50 How the bomb shaped 80s culture
35 “CHARLES II OVERSAW PURITANISM’S DESTRUCTION ALMOST OVERNIGHT” BBC History Magazine
5
Dominic Sandbrook highlights events that took place in April in history
ANNIVERSARIES 25 April 1792
19 April 1927
The guillotine claims its first victim
Mae West is imprisoned for Sex
ven as he was led towards the scaffold, Nicolas-Jacques Pelletier can never have imagined that his name would go down in history. A violent criminal in his early thirties, he had been arrested in October 1791 for a brutal attack on a man in the streets of Paris. At the end of the year he was sentenced to death. But for months, nothing happened. Unknown to Pelletier, he had been chosen to become a guinea pig for France’s latest invention – the guillotine. On a warm afternoon in April, Pelletier was led into the square outside the Hôtel de Ville in Paris, where for hours a large crowd had been waiting for the fun to begin. Dressed in a blood-red shirt, Pelletier was palpably shocked by the sight of the scaffold and reportedly fainted at least once as the guards dragged him up the steps. At the top, beside the strange contraption, stood Charles-Henri Sanson, the veteran executioner,
E
A man is guillotined during the French Revolution, c1793
6
who had argued passionately for the new machine on the grounds of efficiency and reliability. No longer did he need to swing a sword; all he had to do was press a lever. Around 3.30pm, all was ready. Sanson released the blade, and in the blink of an eye Pelletier’s life was over. The first execution by guillotine had been a triumph, yet there were groans of discontent from the crowd. Where was the spectacle, the entertainment, the blood? Up went the chant: “Bring us back our wooden gallows!”
A high-profile trial only serves to further the actor’s notoriety or Mae West, the events of 19 April 1927 were a public-relations coup beyond price. A year earlier, the 33-yearold performer had launched her first play, Sex, at Daly’s 63rd Street Theatre in New York City. West herself played a prostitute, Margie La Monte, and as the title suggests, the treatment could hardly have been more risqué – at least by the standards of the time. Not surprisingly, the city’s cultural conservatives hated it. By contrast, the public seemed delighted, and despite damning reviews and religious protests, demand for tickets was high. But then, in February 1927, the police raided the theatre, arrested the entire cast and charged West with obscenity. For someone with West’s natural flair and eye for a photo opportunity, the ensuing trial was a wonderful chance to confirm her emerging notoriety. When she arrived at the Jefferson Market Courthouse on 19 April, she was in gloriously unrepentant form, much to the displeasure of the judge, George Donnellan, who fined her $500 and sentenced her to 10 days in jail. West spent her first night at the women’s prison at the courthouse. In a scribbled note to reporters the next morning, she remarked that it had been “not so bad. The inmates were very interesting. Will have enough material for 10 shows. I didn’t think much of the bed.” West was then moved to Welfare Island, now Roosevelt Island, where she spent the next seven days. “Hello, Mae!” her fellow inmates shouted when she arrived. “Glad to see you!”
F
BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES
Having witnessed a landmark execution, Parisians are appalled by the lack of entertainment
GETTY IMAGES
Dominic Sandbrook is a historian and presenter. His series about Britain in the 1980s was shown last year on BBC Two
An unrepentant Mae West and fellow leading actor Barry O’Neill at the trial in New York. West was fined $500 and sentenced to 10 days in prison for her ‘obscene’ play Sex
BBC History Magazine
7
Anniversaries 2 April 1801 At the battle of Copenhagen, Horatio Nelson (right) ignores an order to withdraw by deliberately holding the telescope to his blind eye.
15 April 1071 After a long siege, Bari, the last Byzantine possession in southern Italy, falls to the Normans.
16 April 1912 After a flight lasting 59 minutes, the American aviator Harriet Quimby (left) becomes the first woman to fly across the English Channel.
3 April 1882
Jesse James is gunned down America’s most famous outlaw is betrayed by a fellow gang member y the spring of 1882, Jesse James’s career was in deep decline. Perhaps the most famous outlaw in American history, a former Confederate veteran who had slid into a life of paramilitary violence, bank raids and train robberies, James was now 34 years old. His famous gang had largely broken up, while Missouri’s new governor, Thomas Theodore Crittenden, had persuaded the railroad companies to fund a $5,000 bounty for his capture. It was no wonder that to his friends, James seemed nervous, suspicious, even paranoid. The beginning of April found James in St Joseph, Missouri, living under the name of Mr Howard, with his wife, Zerelda, and two brothers, Charley and Robert Ford. Unbeknown to James, the Ford brothers had their eyes on the reward, and had already decided to betray him. The moment came just after breakfast on 3 April. James had just finished reading the newspaper, which reported the confession of one of his old friends, and was in an especially suspicious mood. Robert Ford became convinced that he knew something was up, but at that point James removed his coat, laid down his pistols and went to dust a picture. Now was Ford’s chance. He drew his own gun and fired, hitting James in the back of the head. Hearing the sound, Zerelda ran in. “You’ve killed him!” she screamed. Both Ford brothers surrendered to the authorities later that day, were charged with murder and sentenced to death. But they were never punished. By nightfall the governor had already issued them with a full pardon – proof, many thought, that Crittenden had been in on the plot all along.
Jesse James dusts a picture in his Missouri home – with fatal results. His killers, the Ford brothers, received a full pardon for their crime
8
BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES/TOPFOTO
B
Assassins attack the Medici brothers – Florence’s two most powerful men – in a 19th-century painting
26 April 1478
Murder in Florence’s cathedral With the pope’s backing, two powerful banking families make their move against Lorenzo and Giuliano de’ Medici t was Sunday in Florence; the city’s magnificent Renaissance buildings were sparkling in the spring sunshine. Inside the cathedral, in front of thousands of worshippers, high mass was under way. At the front were the two most powerful men in the city, brothers Lorenzo and Giuliano de’ Medici, whose family had effectively governed Florence for the best part of a century. Close by them, their eyes fixed on the pair, stood their prospective assassins. The plot against the Medici had been brewing for a long time. At its core were two of the city’s rival banking families,
I
the Pazzi and the Salviati, who resented the Medici’s power. In the weeks before Easter 1478, the Pazzis had secured the tacit support not just of the priest presiding that day, the Archbishop of Pisa, but of Pope Sixtus IV himself. At an agreed moment – sources differ over whether this was at the elevation of the Host or the very end of mass – the conspirators struck. The first blow came from one Bernardo Baroncelli, who plunged his knife into Giuliano de’ Medici with the words: “Here, traitor!” More blows followed; as observers remembered, Giuliano’s white shirt ran red with blood. Meanwhile, two knife-
wielding priests had cornered Lorenzo, who, despite a blow to his neck, managed to fight them off with a short sword before a friend shut him in the sacristy for safety. With Lorenzo still alive, the Pazzi conspiracy lost its momentum. The plotters had failed to secure the support of the townsfolk or the city guard, and very swiftly the mood turned ugly. Some of the conspirators were stripped naked and beaten to death; witnesses reported seeing the mob literally sinking their teeth into their corpses. As for Lorenzo, he ruled for another 14 years, earning the nickname ‘the Magnificent’.
COMMENT / Professor Catherine Fletcher
GETTY IMAGES
“Opponents of the Medici looked to overthrow the regime by conspiracy and murder” In the century before the Pazzi conspiracy, the Medici family had built a power base in Florence thanks to wealth from the wool trade and banking. But they were not without their challengers. In 1433 opponents managed, through political manoeuvres, to force Cosimo de’ Medici, Lorenzo’s grandfather, into a short exile. By 1478, however, the Medici and their allies had strengthened their grip on the city’s institutions. They set up special committees to vet candidates for office, and used military emergencies to justify creating structures that functioned
BBC History Magazine
outside the normal rules. As their bank faltered, their power became more and more dependent on the state. It is hardly surprising, then, that this time their opponents looked to overthrow the regime by conspiracy and murder. Their hand was strengthened by the backing of Pope Sixtus IV, who was in conflict with the Medici over the purchase of the city of Imola. Sixtus hoped the Pazzi conspiracy would be followed by a Neapolitan attack on Florence. Lorenzo, however, circumvented that with a spectacular piece of personal diplomacy: in 1479 he sailed to Naples and convinced
its king, Ferdinand, not to go ahead. The Medici would be exiled from Florence twice more: from 1494–1512, and 1527–30. On both occasions they returned to power thanks to Spanish military backing. Catherine Fletcher is associate professor in history and heritage at Swansea University and author of The Black Prince of Florence: The Life of Alessandro de’ Medici (Bodley Head, 2016)
9
%"/"!,6,21%&+( 6,2 ,*"#/,*Ȅ 43% Europe West 31% Great Britain 12% Scandinavia 8% Iberian Peninsula 6% Italy/Greece
Order your complete kit with easy-to-follow instructions. Return a small saliva sample in the prepaid envelope. Your DNA will be analysed at more than 700,000 genetic markers. Within 6-8 weeks, expect an email with a link to your online results.
+ "01/6&0,ƛ"/"!6+ "01/6 +1"/+1&,+)Ǿ
With one simple test, 2+ ,3"/1%"!&ƛ"/"+1-) "0#/,* 6,2/-01Ǿ!&0 ,3"/2+(+,4+ /")1&3"0+!Ɯ+!+"4!"1&)0 ,216,2/2+&.2"01,/6ǽ +,46,2/01,/6ǽ 26+,41+ "01/6!+ǽ ,ǽ2(
The latest news, plus Backgrounder 14 Past notes 16
HISTORY NOW
COURTESY OF PEN AND SWORD BOOKS
Have a story? Please email Charlotte Hodgman at [emailprotected]
EYE OPENER
WRITTEN IN STONE Shortly before midnight on 30 April 1945, the Soviet army seized the Reichstag parliament building in Berlin, an act that became a symbol for the defeat of Nazi Germany. As seen in this image from BBC History Magazine
a new book, We Stormed the Reichstag by Vassili J Subbotin, Soviet soldiers made their feelings clear, scrawling “Hitler kaputt” and other graffiti across the walls and pillars of the famous building.
11
History now / News
EXPERT COMMENT
NEW RESEARCH
“The petitions feature graphic testimonies of what it was like to live with horrifi i c injuries” Historians at Cardiff, ff Leicester, Nottingham and Southampton universities have embarked on a project to discover the human cost of the Civil War that ravaged Britain in the 17th century. Project co-investigator Mark Stoyle explains…
What is the aim of the project ? The impact of the Civil War on everyday life was immense, with a larger proportion of the British population believed to have died during the conflict than in the First World War. We want to find out how ordinary men and women remembered the conflict and how victims of the war negotiated with authorities for charitable relief in its aftermath, as well as to examine patterns of allegiance and wartime behaviour across the kingdom as a whole.
How was financial aid granted? Affected men and women would not have automatically received aid. Petitions setting out a case for financial assistance were submitted to local magistrates or justices of the peace at the county quarter sessions. The justices had the final say in such cases, so each petitioner had to do their best to convince them that they were worthy of support. Many of the petitions feature graphic testimonies of what it was like to live with the horrific injuries, trauma and loss caused by the conflict. The effects of the Civil War continued to reverberate for many years to come – and of course we should not forget that many of those who had witnessed the conflict continued to live on until well into the 1700s. We’ll be creating a freely accessible website which will feature images and transcription ns of all the petitions – so watch tthis space.
What sources will you be studying and what can they tell us? We’ll be examining every petition for financial relief submitted by wounded veterans and war widows in the wake of the Civil War – between 1642 and 1700. These are currently housed in individual repositories acrosss the UK so bringing them all together will mean we can look att the Mark Sto oyle is professor of petitions in a nation nal rather early m modern history at the than regional contexxt. We’ll Un niversity of Southampton get a unique glimpsee into aand co-investigator of the the harsh reality of ‘Welfare, Conflict and the conflict as it Memory During and M was experienced After the English Civil A by ordinary men and d Wars, 1642–1700’ project W women from all A pikeman’s helmet from over the kingdom. c1642-48. The Civil War had a huge impact on the British population
12
Medicinal recipe found in mystic’s manuscript Modern technology has helped researchers unlock the secrets of a medieval autobiography’s enigmatic final page
W
idely regarded as the first autobiography ever written in English, with just one known copy in existence, The Book of Margery Kempe charts the extraordinary story of a medieval woman from Norfolk who claimed to have conversations with God. Since the 1438 manuscript’s rediscovery 80 years ago, it has been digitised and made available online by the British Library, but the faded recipe on the book’s final page has been impossible to read – until now. Recent multispectral-imaging performed by the British Library has allowed Dr Laura Kalas Williams, researcher at Exeter University, to
A folio from the manuscript which shows a reader – known as ‘the red ink annotator’ – engaging with Kempe’s experiences
BBC History Magazine
BRITISH LIBRARY/ COURTESY OF ROYAL CONSERVATOIRE OF SCOTLAND/ MOLA/ GETTY IMAGES/ STAFFORDSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
243,000 interpret the faded text. And what she believes she’s found is an attempt by a late 15th/early 16th-century reader to prescribe a cure for Kempe’s fits of devotion. “Previous scholars have been able to make out the words ‘sugar’ and ‘cinnamon’,” says Kalas Williams. “But I believe this is actually a recipe for herbal sweets known as ‘dragges’ – used as digestive aids to settle the stomach after eating and for bouts of dysentery, known as ‘flux’.” Margery Kempe was a colourful character. There are records of her weeping and roaring in church as she experienced – and believed she was partaking in – visions of Christ. “If we apply medieval medical understanding to Kempe’s experiences, I believe she would have been diagnosed as a ‘melancholic’ – a condition medieval society attributed to an excess of black bile,” says Kalas Williams. “It was believed that this made sufferers predisposed to intuition or giftedness.” The recipe contains fennel seeds, nutmeg, cinnamon, aniseed and ginger, which were mixed with sugar, heated and dried. It seems to have been specifically designed to counter the symptoms of flux. “Other annotations in the book relate directly to Kempe’s words,” says Kalas Williams. “This makes it highly unlikely that the recipe is a random addition to the text. It wasn’t there by pure chance.”
The amount – in US dollars – that the red telephone used by Adolf A Hitler fetched at auction in Maryland, US
HISTORY IN THE NEWS A selection of stories hitting the history headlines
Vikings invaded d d for a fresh start t t Research published in the journal Antiquityy suggests that the ninth-century th i th t Viking Viki invasion of England was due to economic migration, with 35,000 leaving Male plague Denmark for victims buried new lives in hand in hand England from The skeletons of two men AD 800-900. buried, apparently hand in hand, in the early 15th century after succumbing to the Black Death have been discovered in London. Buried in a double grave, it is thought the men may have been related by blood or marriage.
Britain’s first female professor? Emma Ritter-Bondy, professor of piano at Glasgow Athenaeum School of Music from 1892, was Britain’s first female professor, research suggests. Iron She was given the title Age gold 16 years before Edith discovered Morley of Reading What could be University. the oldest hoard of Iron Age gold discovered in Britain has been found in Staffordshire. The pieces – three necklaces and a bracelet – are thought to be about 2,500 years old.
FROM TOP TO BOTTOM: A Norse dragon-prowed ship from a 10th-century AngloSaxon manuscript; two medieval male skeletons burie ed apparently hand in hand; Emm ma Ritter-Bondy; Iron Age gold found in Staffordshire
BBC History Magazine
13
History now / Backgrounder
The historians’ view…
Can the National Front storm the Élysée Palace?
Interviews by Chris Bowlby, a BBC journalist specialising in history
While Marine Le Pen is seen as one of the few candidates who really wants to change things, she is also widely perceived to be dangerous DR EMILE CHABAL
T
he best way to describe the National Front, or FN, is as a permanent protest party. There is little doubt that the FN now has a significant presence in France’s political landscape. In almost any election, it will receive more than 15 per cent of votes and it regularly scores 30 per cent or more in specific parts of northern, north-eastern and southern France. At the same time, the FN is still not a party of government. Some of the most respected surveys have shown that the majority of French electors do not consider a number of FN policy proposals workable or even desirable. While FN presidential candidate Marine Le Pen is seen as one of the few candidates who really wants to change things, she is also widely perceived to be dangerous.
14
Economic factors have helped the FN’s growth. For instance, the unravelling of the industrial working class contributed to the collapse of the Communist Party and the rise of the FN. Economic insecurity also helps explain FN penetration in small towns and villages where people often feel the state has neglected them and that public services are under threat. But other issues are important too. The crisis of the French left highlights the role of political fragmentation in the rise of the FN. The Parti Socialiste (PS) – founded in 1969 – is not primarily a workers’ party, but a party of the urban middle classes, with additional strong local and rural roots. This means it has often been outflanked to the left, first by the communists in the 1970s and now by the Front de Gauche (Left Front). This inability on the part of the PS to unite the entire left has always been a problem. It led to the shock success for the FN – under Marine Le Pen’s father, Jean-Marie Le Pen – in 2002, and may well ensure Marine Le Pen makes the second round of the presidential elections this year. Of course, it is not necessary for a party to win an election in order to have a political impact. The influence of the FN was visible, for example, in Nicolas Sarkozy’s securityorientated presidential term. But it is easy to overstate the power of the FN to shape political discourse. Even in relation to immigration and protectionism – the two issues with
Marine Le Pen addresses a National Front conference in Lyon on 5 February. The FN leader regularly rails against immigration, globalisation and the European Union
which the FN is today most closely associated – its role is uncertain. Immigration has been a major electoral issue across Europe since the 1990s, including in places with weak far-right movements. And a number of different parties and movements in Europe have defended protectionist economic policies since the 2008 financial crisis. I would say the FN has succeeded not so much in changing the agenda of mainstream parties, as in forcing them to discuss issues they would rather have ignored. Resistance to the FN is still strong and the electoral system encourages consensus. The regional elections in 2015 demonstrated the power of what the French call ‘republican discipline’, where mainstream voters cast their second-round votes in favour of whichever candidate is not on the extreme right. For Marine Le Pen to win the run-off and become president, she would have to achieve a feat that has eluded all past French extreme-right movements – from the anti-German militarism of the Boulangists in the 1880s and 1890s to the populism of the Poujadists in the 1950s. This is not impossible, but it seems unlikely.
Dr Emile Chabal is chancellor’s fellow in history at the University of Edinburgh
BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES
Far-right candidate Marine Le Pen has emerged as a frontrunner for the French presidential election. With the dust settling on Donald Trump’s victory in America, two historians assess the prospects of another political outsider surging to power
Flag-wielding National Front supporters sing at a rally staged by party founder Jean-Marie Le Pen in Paris, 2002
French firebrand Pierre Poujade, pictured in his populist pomp. “His shadow hangs heavy over France today,” says Jim Shields
The FN has given its policies a leftleaning, anti-capitalist, protectionist orientation. It can now claim to be the party of the working class in France JIM SHIELDS
SHUTTERSTOCK/ALAMY
T
he shadow of Pierre Poujade hangs heavy over France today. As a template for grievance politics and electoral insurgency, Poujadism – the movement he led – might claim a patent on modern-day political populism. Representing a provincial – and, for them, quintessential – ‘France profonde’ undergoing postwar economic restructuring, the Poujadists staged a popular uprising in the mid-1950s against government, tax authorities, big business, banks, industry, intellectuals and the media. They won 52 National Assembly seats in 1956 with a party fielding butchers, bakers, a bicycle repair man and other traders – or, as Poujade called them, “my sausage merchants”. National decline and cultural pessimism added to a potent brew of discontent
BBC History Magazine
directed at ineffectual elites and a ‘system’ indifferent to the needs of ordinary people. Poujadism styled itself as the first postwar French anti-globalisation movement, defending “the France of crowing cocks” against “the France of Coca Cola”. Sixty years on, the spirit of Poujade is finding new expression in the populist anger that characterises so much of contemporary politics. The dread spectre is no longer the American-style supermarket with its ‘cellophaned bread’ but economic recession, globalisation, immigration, a borderless Europe, and a growing Islamist terrorist threat. And again hostility towards establishment elites runs high. It is little surprise that Jean-Marie Le Pen launched his political career as a Poujadist parliamentary deputy in 1956 – or that the far-right National Front (FN) he led for four decades before his daughter, Marine, reprised tunes from the Poujadist playbook. The early FN was defined by its xenophobic nationalism and its social and economic conservatism. As the party has broadened its appeal, it has given its policies an anti-capitalist, protectionist, markedly left-leaning orientation. The FN can now claim to be the party of the working class in France, while retaining strong support among its traditional Poujadist base of small shopkeepers and self-employed – a rare combination of normally distinct constituencies. Like the movement in which the young
Jean-Marie Le Pen learned his trade, the FN boasts another major asset: its mastery of communication. Poujade disseminated his message through newspapers, memorabilia, gramophone records and even, innovatively, film. Forty years later, the FN was the first French political party to harness the internet by creating a website. Since then, it has invested heavily in developing an extensive social media reach. Starved of favourable coverage in traditional media, Marine Le Pen boasts the highest online profile of all presidential candidates. And an invisible army of followers relay her every message. We won’t know what edge this digital prowess has given Le Pen until the polls close. What is clear, however, is that a new way of doing politics is emerging. And the assumptions on which alternating centreright and centre-left parties have long governed France may one day soon need to be radically reviewed.
Jim Shields is professor of French politics and modern history at Aston University DISCOVER MORE BOOK The Extreme Right in France: From
Pétain to Le Pen by Jim Shields (Routledge, 2007)
15
History now / Backgrounder PAST NOTES BRITISH SUMMER TIME OLD NEWS
Children of invention Sheffield Weekly Telegraph 21 March 1914
I
nvention is not a modern phenomenon. From Leonardo da Vinci’s early prototypes of the helicopter in the 15th century, to Beulah Louise Henry’s 1912 invention of the vacuum ice cream freezer, technological experimentation has been part of our society for a very long time. In 1914, the Sheffield Weekly Telegraph ran a page called “Notes on Science and Invention”, dedicated to exploring the latest in scientific progress. Among the articles on the damaging impact of corsets on upholstery, the new process of sterilising milk by electricity, and fears of global drought indicating the Earth was “drying up”, was a call for new inventions. But it wasn’t the engineers of the adult world the newspaper wanted to encourage but young minds. Declaring that children needed to develop in themselves “the art of inventing”, the paper demanded that they should be encouraged to “invent anything and everything”, and never told to worry if their inventions are useful or make money. The joy of invention, it seems, lies in a child’s imagination.
A woman moves a clock forward for Summer Time hours, 1940
Why do we put our clocks forward for summer? Julian Humphrys springs forward with the answer
ILLUSTRATION BY BEN JONES
News story sourced from britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk and rediscovered by Fern Riddell. Fern regularly appears on BBC Radio 3’s Free Thinking
16
But who had the idea of changing the clocks? The first person to suggest that, instead of trying to persuade people to make more use of the morning light, the clocks should simply be advanced, was London-born New Zealander George Vernon Hudson who presented a paper on the subject in 1895. It was first seriously proposed in Britain in 1907 by William Willett, a London builder. He was a keen horse rider and on his early morning excursions was incensed to see how many curtains were drawn when it was light outside.
What did Willett propose? In his pamphlet The Waste of Daylight he argued that the clocks should be advanced by 20 minutes ahead of Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) every week during April and similarly reversed during September. The first Daylight Saving Bill was introduced into the Commons in 1908. Was the bill passed? No. It was voted down and subsequent attempts to reintroduce it also failed. In the end Germany was the first country to adopt daylight saving time, which it did during the First World War, mainly to reduce the amount of valuable coal being used for lighting. Britain soon followed suit and, on 21 May 1916, British Summer Time was born as the clocks were advanced by an hour. During the Second World War, clocks were kept one hour ahead of GMT in the winter, and Double Summer Time (two hours ahead of GMT) was introduced for summer. After the war, Britain returned to normal summer time except for a trial between 1968 and 1971 when the clocks went forward but not back. It was not deemed successful.
BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES
Who first came up with the idea of daylight saving time? A revival of the ancient and medieval practice of adapting to daylight hours was first mooted in 1784 in a satirical article by Benjamin Franklin, then US ambassador in Paris. Franklin argued that by sleeping in when it was light, Parisians were wasting ‘free’ daylight and came up with a variety of lighthearted suggestions on how to make them change their ways, ranging from putting taxes on shutters and policing candle use to firing cannons at dawn to wake everybody up.
Discover the fascinating finds unearthed during construction of a railway under London
10 February – 3 September 2017 Free entry museumoflondon.org.uk/tunnel 020 7001 9844
Your views on the magazine and the world of history
LETTERS
A few months ago (in Social Media, February), you asked whether history programmes are up for the chop – following an article in the Guardian newspaper arguing that this was the case. I replied, via Twitter, that history programmes will survive but must find new approaches to history to ensure their survival. Well, I think the BBC has taken a great step forward with the reboot of Roots. The first episode was dramatic, heart-wrenching and educational. This shows that a history programme does not have to be another Tudor court intrigue drama or documentary. I say let’s move on from the well-trodden path of the British 16th century and explore alternative paths. They need not be foreign or fictional dramas – perhaps do a historical drama set in Mughal India, or, in respect to LGBT History Month, a documentary on the lives of LGBT figures such as Fanny (Frederick Park) and Stella (Ernest Boulton), or perhaps even Frederick the Great of Prussia. There are so many narratives to explore from history and, like they say, the past is a foreign country, Sarah Kendle, Hertfordshire
A revolution for women? Patrick Walker refers, in his letter (March) about Lucy Worsley’s article on William of Orange (January), y to Tony Benn’s “claim that the Glorious Revolution did nothing for women”. He refutes this allegation by referring to the fact that “it brought Mary, and afterwards her sister Anne, to the throne”. This is, of course, true. But as a 21st-century feminist, I have considerable difficulty seeing how two women being ‘brought to the throne’ did anything for women. In fact, I doubt that their reigns made any difference at all. Margaret King, London
Hitler’s stamp of approval The new BBC TV series SS-GB dramatises how life might have been if
LETTER OF THE MONTH
Could Frederick Park and Ernest Boulton be the stars of a BBC historical drama?
We reward the letter of the month writer with ‘History Choice’ book of the month. This issue, it’s The Locomotive of War: Money, Empire, Power and Guilt by Peter Clarke. Read the review on page 79
Germany had won the Battle of Britain in 1940. The background details, such as swastika banners on a part-ruined Buckingham Palace, seem authentic. But one detail was glaringly incorrect. It was a postage stamp, bearing the head of Hitler and engraved ‘Grossdeutsches Reich’, with the value of 20 marks. As a philatelist and historian, I recognised that such a stamp would neverr have been issued for use in Britain. The stamps issued by German authorities were designed and produced according to Hitler’s view of that country. The east of Poland became a colony of the German Reich and so had d stamps marked ‘General
Gouvernement’. This simply meant ‘under control’ and it was run autocratically by Hitler’s appointee. Other countries that were absorbed into the new German empire would also get stamps marked ‘Grossdeutsches Reich’. Britain, like France, would never have been annexed in this way. In France, stamps were still engraved with the word ‘France’ but dropped the word ‘Republique’. They kept the franc and had illustrations promoting a strong French identity. Instead of swastikas, they carried the word ‘patrie’ or homeland. I imagine that in Britain there would have been a similar approach. No crowns or monarchs but country scenes, seaside views and market towns. Britain always had anonymous stamps and I imagine this would continue with just the word ‘postage’. Currency would be in pence, although at twice the price. Hitler knew that he could never turn this country into a part of Germany. Even postage stamps, as propaganda, would underline that Britain was still British. Derek Perry, London
A certified escape route Lesley Hulonce’s article on pauper children (Escaping the Workhouse, March) omitted to mention another important channel for removing children from the confines of the workhouse, namely Certified Schools. Introduced in 1862, these establishments – which eventually numbered almost 300 – were privately or charitably run and were licensed to receive children boarded out by the workhouse authorities. A number of them had the particular aim of removing Roman Catholic children from the workhouse regime. Some also included non-pauper children among their inmates inmates. Peter Higginbotham, IIlkley T Two stamps produced p during the Third d Reich. The one R on the right is o ffrom occupied Alsace and A depicts Paul d von Hindenburg v
The opinions expressed by our commentators are their own and may not represent the views of BBC History Magazine or the Immediate Media Company
18
BBC History Magazine
REPRODUCED BY COURTESY OF THE ESSEX RECORDS OFFICE/ALAMY
A history survival guide
SOCIAL MEDIA What you’ve been saying on Twitter and Facebook
What do you think was history’s greatest mistake? @DIorioNathaniel AustriaHungary’s decision in 1914 to use the assassination of Franz Ferdinand as a pretext for war with Serbia Michael Oliver World War 1. No true victors, and it spawned World War 2. The west will never recover from that sanguinary conflict
GETTY IMAGES
The 1817 March of the Blanketeers is just as worthy of recognition as more violent incidents such as the Peterloo Massacre (shown above), writes reader Trevor Fisher
A lack of blanket coverage
incidents that came afterward.
On 10 March 1817 several hundred Lancashire weavers set out from St Peter’s Fields in Manchester on what became known as the March of the Blanketeers. The men were carrying blankets to sleep by the road on the march to Westminster in London where they aimed to present a petition to the Prince Regent for parliamentary reform. They claimed this an ancient right, and their march was a key incident in the movement against the unreformed parliament and thus a stepping stone towards our modern democracy. Although troops stopped the bulk of marchers in Stockport, some reached Ashbourne in Derbyshire and at least one made it to London. It was the inspiration for every subsequent march from a provincial centre to Westminster, including the Hunger March from Jarrow in the 1930s and the People’s March for jobs in the 1980s. Despite this, there has been surprisingly little attempt to commemorate the march. 1817 was a year of social unrest, with an alleged revolutionary conspiracy at Ardwick, near Manchester, and an actual armed rising at Pentrich in Derbyshire, both after the Blanketeers. The Pentrich rising led to executions, and with the Peterloo Massacre in 1819 has attracted considerable attention. Perhaps violence will always gain more attention. But it would be short sighted not to acknowledge that the March of the Blanketeers is as valuable to the development of democracy as the more high profile
Trevor Fisher, Stafford
BBC History Magazine
Landlocked charity Clues can be found to the hidden story of British captives sold as slaves (When Britons Were Slaves in Africa, January) but they are not always easy to recognise. Years ago, while transcribing a number of local documents, I came across some intriguing entries in the churchwardens’ accounts for Burford in Oxfordshire: 1626: gave 2 poore men who had been in bondage to the Turk…xviii d 1632: To two men robbed by the Turks…6d To a Walshman surprised by the Turks… 6d To an Irishman his father to be ransomed from Turkey… 2 sh The term ‘Turk’, I discovered, was in general use as meaning Muslim – Turkey having been the dominant Muslim power in the Mediterranean since around 1300. It is interesting to note the number of unfortunate sailors passing through Burford at that time, receiving charity in a small town that could hardly be further from the sea. Joan Moody, Oxfordshire
WRITE TO US We welcome your letters, while reserving the right to edit them. We may publish your letters on our website. Please include a daytime phone number and, if emailing, a postal address (not for publication). Letters should be no longer than 250 words. email: [emailprotected] Post:
Letters, BBC History Magazine, Immediate Media Company Bristol Ltd, Tower House, Fairfax Street, Bristol BS1 3BN
Alan C Co The burning of the Library at Alexandria. All that knowledge lost that we may never know again @DeverCarl German army halting the advance on Dunkirk for 3 days which allowed allies to organise the evacuation @macuaidh83 The Four Pests Campaign (China). Mao’s plan to rid China of sparrows caused an ecological imbalance and exacerbated famine Thomas Iverson The dividing up of the Ottoman empire by the western countries based on geographic lines without regard to historical tribal lands and people groups Oliver Garbett History’s greatest mistake is focusing solely on ‘great figures’ of history: monarchs, rulers etc. History as a discipline would benefit by remembering that great figures need subjects! Chris Creamer Among Cromwell’s lengthy hit list, the regicide stands out. Cancelling Christmas was just insult to injury Aine Foley We are far too Eurocentric, and wonderful histories from other parts of the world are forgotten. That, I think, is history’s greatest mistake. Marina Lindsay George V’s decision not to allow the Russian royal family exile in England preyed on his mind ever after, following the terrible way they died @cassclay38 Hitler declaring war on USA just as the campaign in the east was beginning to go wrong Njord Kane History’s greatest mistakes are when conquerors burn and erase the previous culture’s history and religion and replace it with their own. We always lose valuable information which sets us back, never forward
19
Dr Saunders strikes back
Psychiatrist suffers stroke, then analyses symptoms to help others
Dr Tony Saunders always looked after his health, so it seemed doubly unfair when he collapsed with a major stroke in the gym.
But Tony noticed that discussing his stroke made him anxious – he even started stuttering.
a new generation of doctors are supporting their patients with powerful new techniques.
Tony’s family were worried that he could die, as stroke takes a life every 13 minutes in the UK. And it’s the leading cause of severe adult disability.
As a psychiatrist, he identified this as post-traumatic stress disorder. He then realised that, on top of his medical training, he now had valuable first-hand experience of stroke.
This is Tony’s legacy. And now you can strike back against stroke too, by leaving us a legacy of your own.
Fortunately, with excellent treatment, Tony eventually returned to work.
So Tony struck back by overcoming his anxiety, and giving talks to medical students. As a result,
Together we can conquer stroke. Call 020 7566 1505 email [emailprotected] or visit stroke.org.uk/legacy Registered office: Stroke Association House, 240 City Road, London EC1V 2PR. Registered as a Charity in England and Wales (No 211015) and in Scotland (SC037789). Also registered in Northern Ireland (XT33805), Isle of Man (No 945) and Jersey (NPO 369). Stroke Association is a Company Limited by Guarantee in England and Wales (No 61274)
Comment
Michael Wood on… notions of nations
“Allegiance is what counts – a belief in a strong central authority”
Michael Wood is professor of public history at the University of Manchester. Download his BBC series The Story of England at store.bbc.com/ michael-woodsstory-of-england
Then a Sinologist chipped in: “I don’t see that deeprooted unity. I see frequent massive breakdowns, some very long lasting. I wonder whether our modern sense of China is really more recent, the creation of the Manchus, the Qing dynasty (1644–1911). Wasn’t it they who bequeathed the modern idea of China, administrative and geographical?” Well, breakdowns are certainly a condition of the story, as our films showed. When the glorious Tang fell in 907, 16 dynasties arose in a mere 50 years across the landmass of China. But the soldier diplomat Wang Renyu, who lived through these disasters, still maintained his allegiance to the Chinese state. With a deep sense of history he spoke of “us” and “our nation”, saying: “Heaven I am sure will announce a new Han.” And it did, even though the Sung dynasty, one of history’s most brilliant epochs, occupied only the core of today’s Chinese state, sharing its landmass with other states – which eventually overthrew it. It was with those realities in mind that in 1066 the historian Sima Guang wrote to the emperor that “over the last 1,500 years, in only 300 have we had harmony”. In saying that, he was assuming that authority had passed down to the Sung emperor from the Iron Age; that China was one polity. And from the perspective of British history? Well, Anglo-Saxonists like to talk about the ‘creation of an allegiance’. The 10th-century English kingdom had many different peoples, languages and dialects, and its borders fluctuated, but allegiance to the ruler and his law was the key. Indeed that’s why the historian Patrick Wormald argued that England, not China, was the world’s oldest continuous state. Leaving that aside (what about Japan?), I think the creation of an allegiance is what counts: what the Chinese called the Mandate of Heaven – a belief in, and respect for, a strong central authority. This rests on many things, including a common culture and language, a shared history. And that is still true today: even in England, as we saw only recently in the legal arguments over Brexit. For, after all, weren’t the Law Lords simply affirming our allegiance to the ruler, and her law?
GETTY IMAGES
We live in a world of nation states, most of which are very recent creations, born only in the aftermath of the age of European colonialism. Many in Africa, the near east and Asia are postwar creations (take Pakistan, Algeria or Iraq). Seven have come in the last 15 years. And in historical terms, even the USA is a young country. But some states are very ancient civilisational polities. And among them is China. The other day I attended an event at the new China Centre in Oxford, a magnificent building. I was there to talk about our Story of China series and it was a real pleasure to listen to great scholars who have spent their lives reflecting on their subjects. And for the historian, few subjects these days are more interesting than China. In our films we followed the mainstream historiography in assuming that the polity we call China has existed since the First Emperor Qin Shi Huangdi in 221 BC, resting on even deeper roots: the dynasties of the Zhou, the Shang and even the semi-mythical Xia, which archaeology links with a proto-state on the Yellow river in Henan from c2000 BC. This narrative tradition was crystallised by the great Han dynasty historian Sima Qian; the idea that China began with early dynasties in the Henan plain, the ‘middle land’ which gives us their word for China, Zhongguo. Round the table this narrative was contrasted with that of India. There it is simply not possible to write such a ‘political’ history. Indian civilisation has multiple narratives; India was never united under one rule until the British; and even then the vast patchwork of the Raj couldn’t hold together, breaking apart in 1947. China is a very different case; it was unified early, and though dynasties declined and collapsed, or were conquered, the idea was never lost that rulers of the Middle Kingdom alone had ‘the Mandate of Heaven’. By the 12th century the idea of Han culture, Han speech and Han script was seen as the common culture of Chinese people in the historic heartland.
ILLUSTRATION BY FEMKE DE JONG
BBC History Magazine
21
America in World War One
22
The great American U-turn
BBC History Magazine
Men display their draft cards after registering for conscription in New York City, June 1917. Their nation’s entry into the First World War represents “one of the most dramatic 360-degree turnabouts in modern diplomatic history”, says Adam IP Smith
ALAMY
In November 1916, US president Woodrow Wilson won re-election on an isolationist ticket. But just a few months later, he was issuing an impassioned call to arms. On the centenary of its entry into the First World War, Adam IP Smith traces America’s journey from neutrality to committed combatant Accompanies a new Radio 4 series, America Goes to War BBC History Magazine
23
America in World War One
I
Their fight too? Yet none of this, in itself, was enough to persuade the mass of Americans of the case for war. Wilson, after all, had been re-elected in November 1916 on the slogan ‘He Kept Us Out of War’. Beyond the east coast, most Americans were unpersuaded by the prowar faction’s pleas that this was their fight too. Americans born in Germany or the Habsburg empire still retained loyalties to their 24
A tearful farewell A soldier of the US 71st Regiment Infantry bids his girlfriend goodbye. By the end of the First World War, almost 5 million Americans had served in uniform
homelands – and Irish-Americans, an influential bloc within the Democratic party, were of course staunchly opposed to the US fighting alongside a British state that they thought was holding Ireland in chains. Progressive reformers and intellectuals were also fearful of how war would change America. Just as British liberalism was shattered when the lights went out over Europe, Americans who cared about legislation to improve working conditions, or women’s rights, or political reform, knew that a war would overwhelm all other priorities and might well empower the forces of reaction they had been struggling against. And by 1917, Americans were only too aware from their newspapers of the scale of butchery taking place in France. An Ohio Democratic congressman, Isaac Sherwood, confessed that his experiences in the Union army in the Civil War had “saddened his life”. He made an impassioned plea to colleagues to “keep the stalwart young men of today out of a barbarous war 3,500 miles away, in which
we have no vital interest”. More so than any European power, then, popular support for the war in the US was not a given. Wilson’s chief propagandist George Creel observed that forging a “war-will” in a democracy depended on the “degree to which each one of all the people of that democracy can concentrate and consecrate body and soul and spirit in the supreme effort of service and sacrifice”. But how was this mythical state of unity to be accomplished?
Battered by the Somme When Wilson changed his mind about American engagement, he did so because he felt that he had run out of other options. This was no longer a war of choice, he thought, but a conflict that had been forced upon him. He didn’t know it at the time, but the final chain of events that led him to that conclusion began on 8 January 1917. On that day, the German high command ordered the resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare in the Atlantic. Battered by the Somme offensive on BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES
n a committee room on Capitol Hill on 6 April 1917, Senator Thomas S Martin of Virginia was listening to testimony justifying the White House’s astronomically large appropriations request. When the costs of transportation of troops to France were mentioned, Martin sat up with a bolt. “Good Lord!” he spluttered, “You’re not going to send soldiers over there, are you?” A veteran of the Confederate army in the American Civil War, Senator Martin had just voted for President Woodrow Wilson’s war resolution – but his notion of war evidently did not include actual fighting. Martin’s reaction was not unusual. After all, the US decision a century ago to enter what Americans referred to as ‘the European war’ was one of the most dramatic 360-degree turnabouts in modern diplomatic history and its implications could hardly have been processed in a matter of hours. Martin probably hoped that financial assistance to the Allied powers and a show of naval strength might be enough (though the US navy was hardly, in April 1917, in a position to demonstrate much of anything). And the practical difficulties involved in raising an army seemed overwhelming. Despite the persistent calls for “preparedness” from tub-thumping pro-interventionist former president Teddy Roosevelt, the US had a tiny standing army, and a limited arms industry. Early plans drawn up by the Wilson administration envisaged an American Expeditionary Force arriving in France – but not until sometime in 1919. And even if the logistical challenges could be overcome, how would Americans respond? While European powers were catapulted into war in 1914 with little time to consider the consequences, Americans had been debating the issue for two and a half years. Anglophile east coast elites warned that the US could not honourably avoid the fight against “Prussian autocracy”. Charity fairs raised money for Belgian refugees. A dashing corps of well-bred flying aces volunteered to fight for France, in defiance of Wilson’s plea in 1914 for every American to be neutral in thought as well as deed. Wall Street bankers bet heavily on an Allied victory.
the abdication of the tsar meant that no longer would the US be fighting on the same side as an autocracy. For a brief few months, until the Bolshevik revolution, it was possible for Americans, in the words of the young journalist Walter Lippmann, to speak of the “new democracy of Russia”. Wilson, in any case, insisted that his course was entirely consistent: he was now advocating war to accomplish the same grand objectives he had previously sought through neutrality. The US was not lowering itself to the level of the barbarous Old World powers, but was intervening to create a new world order, modelled on the American example. Wilson put the case in idealistic terms: he wanted to make the world safe for democracy. The Republican senator Henry Cabot Lodge made a similar case in darker terms. Americans, he said, had no choice but to fight to resist “an effort to thrust mankind back to forms of government, to political creeds and methods of conquest which we hoped had disappeared forever from the world”.
Casualties of war
ALAMY
Do the right thing Calls for men to enlist – like this cover page of sheet music for a popular song – played upon the idea that American citizens had obligations to their nation
the western front, the Germans were on the point of being forced to withdraw their forces to the relative security of the Hindenburg line. Seemingly unable to win the war by conventional means, the German government gambled on being able to win it by cutting off Britain’s Atlantic supply-line – even at what they must have known would be the almost certain price of American entry. Wilson had staked much on his efforts to pose as a disinterested mediator; the resumption of U-boat attacks on neutral shipping was a rebuff to his peace efforts as well as a direct threat to US interests. When the new German policy became known, Wilson severed diplomatic relations and, soon after, ordered the arming of US merchant vessels. And then, in early March, the administration revealed to the press the contents of a decoded telegram from the German foreign minister Arthur Zimmermann to the Mexican president suggesting a military alliance. The proposed incentive for the BBC History Magazine
The US, said Wilson, was not lowering itself to the level of the barbarous Old World powers, but was intervening to create a new world Mexicans was the return of Arizona, New Mexico and parts of Texas that they had ceded to the US in the 1840s, a plan seemingly so preposterous that antiwar campaigners denounced it as a forgery, only for Zimmermann himself to confirm the telegram’s authenticity. At about the same time, events in Russia made it easier for the Americans to enter the war. The uprising in Petrograd that led to the formation of the provisional government and
There was a burst of prowar enthusiasm in April 1917 – flags were flown, newspapers published patriotic editorials, and there was much talk of obligation and duty. Contrary to Senator Martin’s evident disbelief that it could be done, an enormous army was created. Nearly 5 million Americans eventually served in uniform. Almost 2 million crossed the Atlantic. Of these, 116,516 died, about 53,000 in combat. This mass mobilisation could not have been achieved without conscription – which conjures up images of a powerful state demanding the ultimate sacrifice from its subjects. But in America in 1917 the federal government was far too small to do the job alone. The huge effort of registering men for the draft, designing propaganda, co-ordinating the shift to war production – and the policing of dissent – was often done by volunteer organisations. Churches, clubs, societies, unions and the like sometimes acted as the state. Local newspapers published the lists of men who had registered for the draft, those who were called up for a medical – and those who had failed to show up. To President Wilson, this was evidence that the war effort was characterised by voluntarism – the willing acceptance of obligation by a patriotic population. Defending the ‘Selective Service’ act that required every man of military age to register for the draft, the president claimed it was “in no sense a conscription of the unwilling; it is, rather, selection from a nation which has volunteered in mass”. In this happy fiction, the factious, divided republic was 25
America in World War One
America’s war years 1914: America stands aside On 4 August, as war begins to rage across Europe, American president Woodrow Wilson (left) proclaims a policy of neutrality, asking Americans to be “impartial in thought as well as in action”. In September, the American Red Cross sends its first ‘Mercy Ship’ to Europe carrying medical staff and supplies.
1915: Roosevelt rattles his sabre
Mercy mission American nurses prepare to embark for Europe aboard the ‘mercy’ ship SS Red Cross, New York, September 1914 Earning their stripes US troops in action at Belleau Wood – their first major battle of the war – in June 1918
One hundred and twenty eight Americans are drowned when a German U-boat sinks the British liner the Lusitania on 7 May. Former president Theodore Roosevelt condemns Wilson’s neutrality and calls on America to join the war on the Allied side.
1916: The military grows In June, in response to Mexican raids across its border and growing tensions with Germany, America passes the National Defense Act to expand the army and navy. Despite all of this, on 7 November, Wilson is re-elected president on the slogan ‘He Kept Us Out of War’.
1917: Battle is joined On 3 February, two days after Germany announces that it will resume unrestricted submarine warfare, Wilson announces that diplomatic ties with Berlin are to be severed. Two months later, in the wake of the Zimmermann telegram being made public, Congress votes overwhelmingly in favour of a declaration of war. Within a matter of weeks, the first US troops, commanded by General John J Pershing, have arrived in France.
Border wars American soldiers during a punitive expedition in Mexico. The US army was expanded in response to raids by its southern neighbour
ALAMY/GETTY/BRIDGEMAN
1918: War trumps liberalism
26
On 16 May Congress passes the so-called Sedition Act, making it illegal to use any “disloyal, profane, scurrilous or abusive language” when the country was at war. A month later, Socialist Party leader Eugene V Debs is imprisoned for impeding the war effort. In June, in what is their first large-scale battle, American troops defeat the Germans at the battle of Belleau Wood. On 11 November, with victory secured, American towns and cities mark Armistice Day with the ceremonial burning of images of the kaiser.
BBC History Magazine
The Ku Klux Klan physically threatened anyone they regarded as insufficiently American. More than 70 people were killed suddenly at one, the government’s role merely being to provide the logistics. The truth was rather more complicated. The United States might have lacked a strong central state (though it was getting stronger) but citizens still had obligations to the nation that could be enforced. In fact, there were many who suggested that, precisely because the United States had long styled itself a democracy, dissent could be more easily delegitimised. Back in the 1830s the perceptive French liberal Alexis de Tocqueville argued that there was less real freedom of mind in America than elsewhere: democracy legitimated the tyranny of the majority. In the First World War, the nation’s ‘war-will’ was both voluntary and coerced.
Four-minute men Urge for revenge A mother and baby drown following the sinking of the Lusitania, in a poster urging men to enlist
Marked man Eugene V Debs, pictured in c1918. The Socialist Party leader was imprisoned for urging resistance to the draft
BBC History Magazine
There was a peppy, upbeat dimension to the effort to instil the right kind of loyalty. It was exemplified by the 75,000 Americans who volunteered as ‘four-minute men’. A play on the revolutionary-era ‘minute men’ who had defended American liberties (against the British), the job of the four-minute men was to deliver speeches of exactly four minutes in length in public places, usually in cinemas and nickelodeons. Four minutes was assumed to be the average attention span of listeners and was also, conveniently, about how long it took a projectionist to change the reel on a feature-length film. The four-minute men wrote their own speeches – this was no centralised dissemination of an official line – but did so on the basis of guidance from headquarters. Arresting openings were encouraged: “Ladies and gentlemen, I have just received information that there is a German spy among us – a German spy watching us,” one speaker began. The four-minute men were usually familiar figures in a local community, but they introduced themselves with a slide announcing that they spoke with “the authority of the Committee on Public Information, Washington DC”. In this way, the volunteers were bestowed with the authority of the state. The four-minute men aimed to morally coerce the population into compliance with the war effort, but there was plenty of violent coercion too. Congress passed laws effectively
criminalising antiwar speech and authorising the detention of ‘enemy aliens’. Prominent opponents of the war including the leader of the Socialist Party, Eugene V Debs, were imprisoned. In Washington, a young J Edgar Hoover began his sinister career in public surveillance in the Bureau of Investigation. But paid agents of the state were not the only ones to exercise police power. A vigilante organisation called the American Protective League (APL) claimed 100,000 members by June 1917 and a quarter of a million by war’s end. Its members, typically professional men over draft age, wore official badges sent by the Justice Department in Washington. The APL was at the forefront of the so-called ‘Slacker Raids’ – large-scale attempts to round-up draft dodgers in which APL members would accost anyone who looked of military age and demand to see their draft registration papers (as everyone was required to have by law). The Ku Klux Klan performed a similar policing role, targeting with physical threats anyone they regarded as insufficiently American. More than 70 people were killed by mobs for alleged antiwar displays. Librarians took it upon themselves to burn German books, and public pressure stopped orchestras performing German composers. School districts banned the teaching of German on the grounds that, in the words of the California State Board of Education, it was a language that “disseminates the ideals of autocracy, brutality and hatred”. Ultimately, it was coercion by neighbours more than the direct intervention of the state that decimated the rich associational world – the schools, churches, newspapers and charities – of German-Americans. The leading pacifist Norman Thomas called all this a “national madness”. And the violence in American society continued after the Armistice – into the repression of labour unions and African-Americans in 1919 – paving the way for the revived Ku Klux Klan and immigration restrictions of the 1920s. Americans were torn between old notions of citizenship as obligation, and a newer idea that citizenship conferred individual rights. Their deeply held suspicion of centralised government power was balanced by a deep fear of subversion. That remains the case to this day. Adam IP Smith is a senior lecturer at University College London, specialising in American history. He also presents history series on BBC Radio 4 DISCOVER MORE RADIO Adam IP Smith’s two-part
series, America Goes to War, is due to air on Radio 4 in May
27
WWI eyewitness accounts
OUR FIRST WORLD WAR
Back on the front foot In part 35 of his personal testimony series, Peter Hart takes us back to April 1917, when a British offensive ff on German defences on the western front, known as the battle of Arras, was launched. Peter is tracing the experiences of 20 people who lived through the First World War – via interviews, letters and diary entries – as its centenary progresses A (possibly staged) image of medical staff with wounded troops
ILLUSTRATIONS BY JAMES ALBON
Kate Luard
and the field ambulance with all his other injuries.
Londoner Kate, born in 1872, trained as a nurse. She had already served in the Boer War when in 1916 she again volunteered and was immediately dispatched to France.
The arrangements worked as well as could be expected. The Arras offensive may have been a success, but there were still thousands of casualties to be treated.
On 9 April, the battle of Arras began. A major operation in itself, its primary purpose was to pin down German reserves to assist the main attack to be launched by General Nivelle’s French armies in the Champagne area on 16 April. At the front, the attack was a great success: the Canadian Corps surged forward to seize the Vimy Ridge, while the British Third Army advanced nearly four miles towards Monchy le Preux. But, behind the line, it was a nightmare for Kate Luard, serving with the 32nd Casualty Clearing Station. Her responsibility was the Preparation for Theatre Ward, where every stretcher case would be sent.
Here the number of battered men, generally from 50 to 60, never seems to grow less, because although they are carried, when ready, to the operating teams in the theatre,
28
their places are continually filled by others. All the layers of sodden or caked stiff clothing are cut off and pyjamas or long flannel pinafore gowns put on, which are taken from a blanket and screen enclosure kept heated by a ‘perfection lamp’. Hot blankets, hot water bottles, hot drinks, subcutaneous salines and hypodermics are given here. It often happens that no medical officer can be spared for this tent, so a great deal of responsibility is thrown on to us, and only the sisters with nerve, experience and sound judgment are any good here. With any luck you may be able to have two sisters to spare for this work and one or two orderlies or convalescent patients. Once, when I was cutting a split boot off a man wounded in the head, chest, and the other thigh, half his foot came off in it – a detail overlooked in the dressing hut
Stretchers on the floor are back-breaking work, and one’s feet give out after a certain time, but as long as one’s head and nerves hold out, nothing else matters, and we are all very fit. Evacuation has been held up today for some hours and the place is clogged. The wards are like battlefields, with battered wrecks in every bed and on stretchers between the beds and down the middles. The padre is wonderful; he fills hot bottles with his one arm and gives drinks and holds basins for them to be sick, and especially looks after those poor ghastly moribunds. The theatre teams have done 70 operations in the 24 hours. These ‘battlefields’ show up the best in everyone; the orderlies are splendid and refuse to go to bed, and never lose patience in the most trying moments.
Joe Murray Joe grew up in a County Durham mining community. He served at Gallipoli with the Hood Battalion of the Royal Naval Division, before being transferred to the western front and fighting at the Somme. The failure of the Champagne offensive – launched on 16 April – left the French army in a state of unrest; mutinies were beginning to break out. A diversion was essential and the British had to extend their offensive at Arras. This prompted the second battle of the Scarpe on 23 April, but it lacked the careful planning and overwhelming artillery support that had blessed the initial attack a fortnight before. As he waited to go over the top, Leading Seaman Joe Murray of the Hood Battalion little knew that this was to be his last battle.
BBC History Magazine
AKG-IMAGES-ULLSTEIN BILD/PICTURE CONSULTANT: EVERETT SHARP
April 1917
It was almost daylight. The barrage opened. Asquith [Arthur, a senior officer and son of the former prime minister] came along and we were given instructions before we left. We were not supposed to move until the barrage lifted off the German front line in front of Gavrelle. But Asquith, instead of waiting until the barrage lifted, took us forward. We went to within about 50 yards when it lifted. His judgment was perfect and we were on top of his line before Jerry knew anything about it. When you got in the village it was a different kettle of fish; Jerry was in the cellars. They had not been trained in street fighting and found themselves under fire from all sides. It was now quite light and, being in the open, we were perfect targets. There were bricks flying about, rifle fire, machine gun fire, shelling. You couldn’t keep in formation. There was no sort of line, no sort of direction.
Murray moved forward as best he could, pushing towards the centre of Gavrelle.
Just before we got to the mayor’s house, I was fooling round trying to get over an old door of a house. I slipped and saw a rifle, from a cellar – I could only see the barrel. I turned quickly round to the left and fired. I had got a revolver as an NCO Lewis gunner, but I always carried a rifle with me on these occasions as well. I fired, but I didn’t need the smoke from his rifle to know that I’d been hit. My hand was in my pocket and it went through my wrist. I couldn’t get me hand out of my pocket – it was paralysed. The blood was running down my trouser leg, excruciating pain. I thought: “I’ve got to get out of here somehow.” Murray had the good fortune to be helped by some German prisoners, and was then safely evacuated to Blighty. His active service war was over.
“I didn’t need the smoke from his rifle to know that I’d been hit. The blood was running down my trouser leg”
Victor Goddard Victor was born in 1897. After attending Dartmouth College as a cadet, he served as a midshipman on HMS Britannia from 1914 to 1915. Following balloon training, he was posted onto airships with the Royal Naval Air Service in June 1915. In spring 1917, Lieutenant Victor Goddard was sent to command the Coastal Airship C27 based at Pulham.
The actual body of the airship was two aircraft fuselages cut in half, their tails taken off, put middle to middle, so that it had two engines, one at each end, and a long parallel body with four seats in it. The functions of each member of the crew were roughly as follows: the captain of the airship sat in the second seat, and he flew the airship as regards its height and
its state of balance and pressure. The front seat was occupied by the coxswain, who maintained it on the ground and had charge of the ground crew. But in the air he steered the airship to a course which the captain gave him, by voice-pipe. Behind the captain’s seat, in the third seat from the front, was the navigator. The back seat was occupied by a wireless operator engineer, who had a smattering about the engines, but in fact was a skilled radio operator. He would be the man who would transmit messages and receive instructions when we were in the air. It was rather similar to what I’d been used to in the SS type. The body was a bit larger, a little more capacious, but it wasn’t very much better upholstered as far as I remember; you still had your head and shoulders in the open air. You weren’t closed in at all, so you had to really wrap up – 12-hour patrols were not unusual, ostensibly submarine searching. We used to fly over the shipping routes and we didn’t ever see anything except shipping and minesweepers of our own. I never saw any enemy. I came to the conclusion that we were animated scarecrows who were doing a useful job in keeping the submarines under the surface, so they didn’t come up. In fact, when I, or any of us, were about the place no ship was ever attacked by a submarine. Peter Hart is the oral historian at the Imperial War Museum
DISCOVER MORE WEBSITE You can read some previous
instalments of “Our First World War” at historyextra.com/ ourfirstworldwar TV AND RADIO The BBC’s First World War
coverage is continuing. You can find out more details through the regular TV and radio updates on historyextra.com
NEXT TIME: “He’d got a piece of shell clean through the top of his helmet” BBC History Magazine
29
British cycling
CHOPPERS, BURNERS AND
BONESHAKERS Steve Humphries traces the rise of British cycling over the past 150 years through the fortunes of its best-known manufacturer: Raleigh Accompanies a BBC Four documentary Pedalling Dreams: The Raleigh Story
1. Born-again biker
The story of British cycling’s rise to global domination begins with the adventures of Frank Bowden, a young British lawyer, born in Exeter in 1848. He made his fortune in property development in Hong Kong during the 1870s, but became seriously ill. When he returned to England he was told by his doctor he probably only had six months to live, but that riding a bike might prolong his life. Frank took up cycling with a passion and, a year later, was healthier than ever before. In the true spirit of the Victorian entrepreneur, he wanted to share the health benefits of the bicycle – and at the same time make a tidy profit. He found the perfect match when he came across a small bicycle company based in Raleigh Street, Nottingham. Frank was so impressed by the bikes they made he bought the business and in 1888 the Raleigh Bicycle Company was born. Rapid expansion followed as the company replaced big-wheeled boneshakers with safety bicycles. They acquired gear manufacturer Sturmey-Archer who pioneered the three-speed hub, enabling Raleigh riders to change gear at the turn of a lever. By 1896 they occupied a five-acre factory in Nottingham, and had such confidence in their bikes that they offered a lifetime guarantee with every one they sold. Frank Bowden died in 1921. By that time he’d transformed a backstreet workshop into the biggest bicycle manufacturer in the world, inspiring thousands of people to enjoy the health benefits of the pastime that had once saved his life.
30
A poster advertising Raleigh’s all-steel bike. The promise of fresh air and exercise has been luring cyclists out into the British countryside since the 19th century
GETTY IMAGES
A Victorian entrepreneur found a new lease of life – and all-conquering bikes – in the backstreets of Nottingham
3. A racing superstar Some of the best cyclists in the world helped power Raleigh’s relentless growth
Members of the pioneering Rosslyn Ladies Cycling Club cycle through Hadham Cross, Hertfordshire in the 1930s
2. Cycling’s golden age
GETTY IMAGES
From 1900 to 1950, the bike became the essential n mode of transport for men and women, young n and old The first half of the 20th century was a boom time for cycling, especially Raleigh. They marshalled some of the top art, design and engineering talent in the country to create some of the best mass-produced bikes in the world. Raleigh dominated the bicycle market at home and across the Commonwealth and empire. In doing so, they helped create a vibrant cycling culture in Britain. At first it was largely male – women riders were regarded as ‘fast’ and unladylike. But, gradually, more women took up cycling and there were women’s racing clubs too, like the trailblazing Rosslyn Ladies Cycling Club formed in Essex in 1922, which pioneered women’s competitive racing. More and more men and women saw the bike as an essential purchase BBC History Magazine
to get them to and from work, often cycling into their offices or factories from the new interwar suburbs. The bike was also an essential form of in ndividual transport for many occupations like the postman, the policeman, the midwife and the district nurse. And with the new vogue for fresh air A and exercise, many people saw the a bike as a means to enjoy themselves b with long cycle rides to the countryw sside and coast at weekends. During these boom years, Raleigh grew and prospered, courtesy of g itts reliable, sturdy bikes – many of them ‘sit-up-and-beg’ roadsters with a strong middle-class appeal. w And the company developed a A range of children’s bikes too, so that, by the 1930s, a bicycle had become one of the most popular b birthday presents. b
From the beginning, Raleigh understood that the best marketing tool of all to help sell their bikes was to sign up cycle racing champions. In the 1890s American cyclist Arthur Zimmerman, or ‘Zimmy’ – one of the world’s greatest cycling sprint riders and winner of the first world championship in 1893 – won more than a thousand races riding for Raleigh. The company regularly made attempts on long distance cycling records, and in July 1908 Harry Green rode from Land’s End to John O’ Groats in a spectacular two days, 19 hours and 50 minutes on his Raleigh. But their greatest signing of all was amateur champion and cycling legend Reg Harris, whose statue overlooks the Manchester velodrome. Reg was a working-class boy who escaped the Lancashire mills to dominate track racing for decades. He began racing professionally for Raleigh in 1949 and that same year he won the first of four World Professional Sprint Championship titles, gaining victory on his famous ‘Red Raleigh’ and launching the slogan: ‘Reg Rides a Raleigh’. With his charm and good looks, Reg was soon as popular as sporting heroes like Stanley Matthews and Stirling Moss. His name was associat with one of the company’s best-loved and bestselling postwar models, the Lenton Sports. His Raleigh bicycle played a starring role again in 1974 when he came out of retirement to win the British Professional Sprint Championship at Leicester.
With his charm, good looks – and world-beating speed – Reg Harris was British cycling’s first superstar
13
British cycling
5. The Chopper proves a hit with the kids As car ownership soared, small-wheeled bikes breathed life into an ailing cycling market
4. Repetitive, noisy and dangerous Raleigh garnered publicity for all the wrong reasons in the cult 1960 film Saturday Night and Sunday Morning The Bowden family who owned and ran Raleigh were paternalistic employers, with a genuine concern for their workforce, and were keen to promote an image of Raleigh as one big happy family. They knew that much of the work on the assembly line in their Nottingham factory was repetitive, noisy and sometimes dangerous too. So to encourage the wellbeing and loyalty of their workers they paid for sports facilities, dances in the company ballroom and away days to Blackpool. They also had their own medical centre and convalescent home. Many worked at Raleigh throughout their lives. But all this changed in the postwar years, especially when Raleigh merged with Tube Investments, owner of the giant British Cycle Corporation. As the old bonds of loyalty started to break down, discontent on the factory floor was on the rise. This was reflected in the gritty feature film Saturday Night and Sunday Morning (1960), which told the story of Arthur Seaton – played by Albert Finney – a rebellious anti-hero bored with life on the production line. Filmed in part in the Raleigh factory, it was based on a book written by ex-worker Alan Sillitoe. In the real world, power was shifting to the unions and over the next two decades Raleigh would be hit by strikes over pay and conditions that would cost millions and weaken their position on the international market.
32
own version, the RSW16, while a later foldable model became a huge hit with shoppers and commuters, especially women. The RSW paved the way for other small-wheeled cycles, which ultimately led to the development of the iconic Raleigh Chopper, first produced in 1970. It was an instant hit with children and teenagers alike. They loved its revolutionary high-rise handlebars, large rear reflector and the trademark elongated seat. The gear stick mechanism was also very distinctive. It all showed that Raleigh was now catering for a younger market that prized fashion above the more traditional values reflected in the sit-up-and-beg or drop-handlebar models that had dominated in the past. Most Choppers were given to kids as Christmas presents, so the Raleigh production process was geared up to fulfilling the huge demand created by Christmas lists every December.
A young boy rides his revolutionary Chopper in the 1970s
REX RE R EX FERE E FEREX/AD X/ADVERT / VERTISIN ISING S G ARCHIV AR C CHIVES ES S
Albert Finney plays a disaffected Raleigh factory worker in 1960
There was a revolution in bicycle design in the early 1960s when a slump hit the cycle market. As living standards increased, so too did car ownership, and the bike fell out of favour. With the new town planning and motorway building schemes that took hold in the 1960s and 70s, everything was designed around the culture of the car. The bicycle became marginalised and more dangerous to ride, with an ever rising injury and death rate on the roads. Raleigh’s sales figures were falling fast and it would take something special to revive their fortunes. It came with the small-wheeled bike, designed for city living, and first pioneered by the inventor Alex Moulton. These bikes proved incredibly popular. Raleigh made their
BBC C History Magazine e
Members of Britain’s first BMX team, Team Ace, take to the air in 1982. Soon thousands of young Britons would be attempting to emulate them
S SHUTTERSTOCK S OCK
6. BMX mania sweeps Britain Stunts and jumps on small, agile bikes were all the rage in the 1980s
7. A battle for survival
In the early 1970s children started racing on dirt tracks in California, helping to create a new sport called Bicycle Motocross, or BMX for short. Soon the BMX craze was sweeping across Britain, and creating a demand for small and agile bikes. They brought a new level of fun to cycling, their lightweight design enabling riders to perform jumps and tricks with ease. Raleigh were slow to pick up on this new trend but, by the early eighties, they started making their own BMX bikes – and, in 1982, launched the Raleigh Burner. The bikes flew off the production lines, with big sales to boys and young men. To give their publicity an extra push, Raleigh began to sign up the best riders in the country for a new team that included Andy Ruffell, a teenager from Walthamstow who had been national racing and freestyle champion. He was also contracted to travel to Raleigh dealerships around the country, performing stunts for his fans, and signing autographs. In doing so, Ruffell helped sell thousands of Burners nationwide. Over the next few years Raleigh formed a new mountain bike racing team and launched an upmarket model called the M-Trax. They would go on to sell more than 3 million mountain bikes.
The drop off in demand for Raleigh’s traditional bikes meant it desperately needed to sell more modern machines. The quickest route to sales was through a successful racing team. So, in 1974, Raleigh opened a new factory in Ilkeston, called the Specialist Bike Development Unit. Here, bespoke, hand-crafted racing bikes were produced for a brand new racing team. The bikes Raleigh made at the SBDU were among the best in the world, and in a short time the team began to win some of Europe’s top races, including the Tour de France in 1977 and 1980. Cycle dealers across Europe now began stocking Raleigh bikes. But this didn’t result in a significant sales boost because the mountain bike boom had led to the decline of the traditional racer. Raleigh was falling out of fashion fast and the rise in much cheaper (but high-quality) bikes imported from the far east spelt the beginning of the
BBC C History Magazine e
In the past 30 years, Raleigh has felt the squeeze from mountain bikes and competition from the far east
Joop Zoetemelk on his way to winning the 1980 Tour de France with the TI-Raleigh team
end for bicycle production in Nottingham. The main factory closed in 1994 and ownership of the Raleigh brand changed several times over the following years. It is currently owned by a Dutch company, Accell. Raleigh bike sales in the UK currently stand at around half a million a year, and look set to increase with the growing popularity of cycling. And there’s also a new racing bike team, hoping to emulate past glories. But whatever the future holds for Raleigh, to the thousands of us who have spent hours sat on one – whether learning to cycle or touring the British countryside – it will always be the people’s bike. Steve Humphries is an award-winning film-maker specialising in social history documentaries DISCOVER MORE TELEVISION The BBC Four documentary
Pedalling Dreams: The Raleigh Story is available now on BBC iPlayer
33
+ + +++ THE TIMES
+ + +++ TIME OUT
ABEL GAN CE’S R E VO LUTIO NARY SILENT EPIC
R E S T O R AT I O N BY K E V I N B R O W N L O W
D I G I TA L LY R E M A S T E R E D
AVAI L AB LE N OW O N B LU - R AY & DVD
Pearson have exciting opportunities for History teachers to become Examiners for RXU*&6(DQG*&($/HYHOTXDOLFDWLRQV This is a great way to get closer to the subject you love whilst gaining an insight LQWRDVVHVVPHQW 7RQGRXWIXUWKHULQIRUPDWLRQ SOHDVHYLVLWZZZHGH[FHOFRPDDUHFUXLWPHQW RUHPDLODDUHVRXUFLQJ#SHDUVRQFRP
Photo: Christof Van Der Walt
Enhance your teaching career today
M U S I C BY C A R L DAV I S
THE HISTORY ESSAY
Charles II’s coronation procession makes its way to Westminster Abbey on 22 April 1661. With the shackles of puritanism thrown off, the people of England could now gamble on horses, make music, play cricket and celebrate Christmas with gusto
1660: THE YEAR THAT CHANGED EVERYTHING
BRIDGEMAN
In terms of sheer impact on the ordinary people of England, Charles II’s restoration is eclipsed only by the events of 1066 By Ian Mortimer
BBC History Magazine
35
The Restoration THE HISTORY ESSAY
D
ynasties and dates – are they really that important? So often the death of one king and the accession of his successor, while unsettling at the time, had little impact on the daily lives of the ordinary people. It is difficult to point to any great social changes that were due to the death of the ferent form of government. That itself was much more than a new face on the coins and a new head wearing the crown. It led to the restoration of the political power of the aristocracy and the revitalisation of many customs and practices that had been prohibited for over a decade. But the changes to life across the country were even more profound than in 1649, for the introduction of a puritan social agenda, from 1642 to Cromwell’s death, had been a gradual process. Charles II oversaw its destruction almost overnight.
T
he radical changes of the Restoration could be seen even before Charles set foot back on English soil. The prince promised four things in the Declaration of Breda, signed shortly before his return. These were: to pardon all those who had committed crimes against him and his father during the Civil Wars and Cromwell’s republic (except those who had signed Charles I’s death warrant); to honour all sales and purchases of land in that time; to tolerate people of all religious faiths; and to give the army its back-pay, and recommission the troops in the service of the crown. Following this, parliament proclaimed Charles king on 8 May and sent messengers to him inviting him to return. This act itself was exceptional: previously no parliament could assemble unless it was summoned by the king. In 1660, as the 20th-century historian GM Trevelyan memorably observed, it was Parliament who summoned the king. The very use of a capital P in that sentence denotes the difference: parliament had reinvented itself as more than just ‘a parliament’ – a meeting of representatives held at the king’s behest. It had established its own legitimacy, which it then confirmed in an Act to which Charles II assented. With immediate effect the House of Lords was reinstated. The structure of the Church of England that had existed prior to the Commonwealth (the period
A diagram of the womb in The Midwives Book (1671). From 1660, following a decade of being denied professional recognition, midwives could once more gain licences to practise
36
BBC History Magazine
BRIDGEMAN
monarch between 1066 and 1553, for example. Yet there are a few occasions when changes in monarch really did matter. The demise of the last Saxon king at Hastings in 1066 was quickly followed by the introduction of Norman governance and the redistribution of large swathes of England to foreign lords. The deaths of Edward VI (1553) and Mary I (1558) significantly affected the religious – and thus the social – condition of the realm. Charles I’s execution in 1649 allowed Oliver Cromwell to reform the government and continue the puritan agenda that parliament had started to introduce in the early 1640s. However, another dynastic date, 1660, stands out as perhaps second only to 1066 in its impact on the people of England. The year of Charles II’s restoration saw sudden, profound and permanent changes at every level of society, from the ruling classes down to the level of the most humble servant. To appreciate the change that the country experienced in 1660 you first have to reflect that there was no such thing as a king of England in 1659. Oliver Cromwell had died in September 1658, leaving his son Richard as Lord Protector of the Commonwealth. But whereas Oliver had always enjoyed the support of the army, Richard had no military experience: he resigned the Protectorship in May 1659, creating a power vacuum. And that terrified the people. It was not so much a matter of who might step into that vacuum as what. No one could tell what sort of religious extremists might attempt to seize control. Most of all, the Civil Wars of 1642–51 had not been forgotten; there was a real fear that England might again be plunged into lawlessness and violence. On 11 October 1659 the writer John Evelyn wrote in his diary: “The army now turned out parliament. We had now no government in the nation; all in confusion; no magistrate either owned or pretended but the soldiers, and they not agreed. God almighty have mercy on us and settle us!” The return to England of the prince, Charles Stuart, in May 1660 and his accession as Charles II thus meant the re-establishment of the monarchy and a dif-
THE HISTORY ESSAY
The news that, instead of being hanged, an adulterer would be punished with a spell of humiliation in a white sheet at the church door, or in the marketplace, was a relief to those who had affairs in which Cromwell had ruled England as a republic) was restored, and so were the ministers who had been ousted from their livings. Parliament also passed legislation confirming the king’s promises. A new standing army was set up – 1660 is the date from which we date the oldest regiments in the British Army – and feudal tenure was finally abolished. Henceforth, manorial lords no longer held their land from the king but instead owned it freehold. Feudal rights due to the crown were extinguished in return for an annual payment of £100,000. All this was highly significant but it really was just the tip of the iceberg, for the Restoration had the most dramatic impact on ordinary people too. The return of the episcopal hierarchy brought with it the re-establishment of church courts. Large numbers of physicians, surgeons, schoolmasters and midwives, who effectively had been unable to get official recognition of their professional status for more than a decade, flocked to present themselves and gain licences to practise. From 1660 you could now once more prove a will locally in an archdeaconry or a consistory court. People could once more also report their neighbours for moral offences such as bigamy, adultery and drunkenness and expect the wrongdoers to be summoned to the archdeaconry court. Latin, the language of the courts, which had been prohibited by Cromwell, made a comeback. The puritan government of the interregnum had taken a stern view of moral crime, dealing with wrongdoers not in the church courts but in the secular county courts and assizes. In 1650 the Commonwealth government had passed the Adultery Act, by which those found guilty could be sentenced to death. Although the act was so severe it was only enforced a few times, it hung over the heads of many.
BRIDGEMAN
M Men socialise in a coffee house, as depicted in a 17th-century illustration. With coffee, tea and chocolate now widely available, the chattering classes congregated in such establishments to conduct business and exchange political ideas
BBC History Magazine
ore rigorously imposed were the laws against swearing (you could be fined for simply saying, “as God is my witness”), the opening of ale houses, and breaking the Sabbath. Constables could search kitchens on Sundays to ensure no unnecessary work was being done. No selling or buying or agricultural work was permitted, and even going for an afternoon stroll with your loved one on the Lord’s Day could leave you liable to a fine. A maidservant found mending her dress on a Sunday was reported to the authorities and placed in the stocks in the rain as a punishment. Thus the repeal of all the legislation passed by the Commonwealth government was like a huge lifting of social oppression on those who lived ordinary lives. The news that, instead of being hanged, an adulterer would again be punished with a spell of humiliation in a white sheet at the church door or in the marketplace was a blessed relief to those who had illicit affairs. But it signals a more general change of attitude towards sex that followed the Restoration. When he landed in England, Charles already had an acknowledged illegitimate child by Lucy Walter, and anyone who knew him suspected that she wouldn’t be the
37
The Restoration THE HISTORY ESSAY
The rakes, like the king with his many mistresses, were kicking against the puritans in society. Their behaviour was calculated to shock and ridicule those who had cut off the head of Charles I
T
his brazenness marks another aspect of the watershed that was 1660, namely the rebelliousness of the rakes. There was no latitude for rakish behaviour in the 1650s. But after 1660, a plethora of young men were welcomed at court – men such as Lord Rochester, Lord Buckhurst and Sir Charles Sedley. Generally drunken and offensive libertines, they were scandalous and satirical in equal measure. To give an inkling of their antics, Pepys describes a notorious event in 1663, when Charles Sedley stripped and paraded naked on the balcony of a cook shop in London, reading from the scriptures and commenting on them blasphemously, and playing out “all the postures of lust and buggery that can be imagined”. (At this time, buggery was a vice that was punishable by death.) In the course of his show, Sedley declared to the crowd of around 1,000 people that he had a powder such as would make all the ‘women’ of the town run after him – except that he did not use the word ‘women’ but referred to them by their sexual organs. Next he took a glass of wine, washed his private parts in it and then drank it. After that he drank the king’s health usingg the same glass. Sedley got into trouble – as did all the rakes – but th hat is not the point. Society under Charles did not punish the rakes r severely; it tolerated them. The reason was that the rakes, like the king himself with his many mistressess, were kicking against the puritans in society. Their behaviour was calculated to shock and ridicule those who had cut off the head of Charles I and, in doing so, had plunged the nation into a crisis. The more subtle, all-pervading changes brought on by the return of the king went even further than this. The restoration of aristocratic power, coupled with the decline of restrictive moral codes of conduct, led to something of an aristocratic renaissancee. Hierarchy became fashionable again: people started d to
flaunt their wealth more openly. Whereas in the 1650s the interests of the Commonwealth had prevailed in public, from 1660 conspicuous consumption was allowed to let rip. Foreign fashions were imported, adopted and cast aside within a year or so. The volumes of textiles imported from the orient, such as chintzes from India, increased. New commodities such as tea, coffee and chocolate were likewise shipped to England in much greater quantities as the urban and middle classes once more took to aping the fashionable practices of the gentry and aristocracy.
U
nder the Commonwealth, gambling was forbidden, so it could only take place covertly. Under Charles II, it was not only conducted in public, but on a massive scale. By 1664, the problems of heirs betting colossal fortunes had forced the government to introduce the Gaming Act, making gambling debts of more than £100 unenforceable. Nevertheless, people continued to wager sums without caution. In 1674 Charles Cotton, author of The Complete Gamester, r noted that several estates of more than £2,000 per year had recently been lost at cards and tables (the backgammon board, on which several games were played, besides backgammon). Nor were these the only ways in which people threw away their wealth: bowling greens, cricket pitches, golf courses, pall-mall courts and tennis courts were all places where huge sums were won and lost. One wrestling match in St James’s Park in 1667 between the men of the West Country and those of the North was for a purse of £1,000 in addition to all the bets placed on the outcome. You could not have seen such a spectacle under Cromwell’s rule. And of course gambling underpinned the sport of kings, which, like wrestling, pall-mall and many other sports, was banned or discouraged by the puritans. One of the new king’s first sporting activities after his accession was to reopen Newmarket, which Cromwell had left in ruins. Very quickly it became one of the country’s ggreat magnets g for horse-racing enthusiasts. Such was the passion for gambling thatt gentlemen even started to place bets on their footmen, so o that races between runners were held for the first time in n England. If 1660 saw a sea change in the recreational pursuits of thee wealthy, the same was true for those who were more interested in popular games and blood sports. m Bear baiting had been outlawed by the CommonB wealth – not on the grounds of cruelty to the aniw mals but on account of the sins that it allowed specm ttators to indulge in: drinking, betting and swearing. Cromwell’s soldiers shot all the bears in London; C fighting cocks had their necks wrung. The Restorafi tio on meant the restoration of these popular amusemeents too – and such traditions as playing football on a Sund day and dancing around the maypole. Most extraor-
Charles II made little attempt to hide his affair with his mistress Barbara Villiers, shown here with her child
38
BBC History Magazine
TOPFOTO
last of his mistresses. Indeed, even before Charles had left the Hague, he had bedded Barbara Villiers, wife of English courtier Roger Palmer. Barbara became his principal concubine for the next few years. The contrast of the libidinous king and the previous government, which had until recently treated people such as him and his mistresses with the utmost severity, is astonishing. It was even more shocking at the time, given the openness of the king’s affairs. Even Samuel Pepys, who had a series of illicit sexual liaisons himself, was taken aback at the brazen way the king would leave Barbara Villiers’ apartments in the morning and walk back to his queen in the palace. No English king had ever given a title to one of his mistresses before but Charles II created two of his mistresses duchesses, and made special provision for them to pass their titles to his illegitimate sons by them. Previously, illegitimacy had been a bar to the inheritance of a title. In all, Charles’s illegitimate offspring included six dukes and one earl.
BRIDGEMAN
THE HISTORY ESSAY
Charles II holding the new orb and sceptre crafted for his coronation by goldsmith Sir Robert Vyner. The king took every opportunity to flaunt his power and wealth, and many of his subjects were more than happy to follow suit
BBC History Magazine
39
The Restoration THE HISTORY ESSAY
The king and his brother, the Duke of York, acted as patrons of drama and gave their names to the new London theatre companies. In doing so, they helped usher in the second great age of English dramatic writing
A singer, violinist and clavichordist perform in a c17th-century engraving. In the wake of Charles II’s restoration, musicians returned to the royal court and ordinary people sang songs that had been banned under Oliver Cromwell
was demolished and tenements built on the site. The return of the king and his brother, the Duke of York, who both acted as patrons of drama and gave their names to the new London theatre companies, was a hugely significant change. It ushered in England’s second great age of dramatic writing. The Restoration shows that dynasties and dates can have enormous significance. The year 1660 is something of a continental shelf in its changes, in that the new regime had a profound effect on everyone socially, in their everyday lives, as well as politically. With this in mind, and given the fact that we still have the same monarchy that was restored in that year, 1660 perhaps should be thought of alongside 1066 as a date everyone should know. It is a fascinating point in our history – and one of the few periods in which we can say without fear of contradiction that the history of the monarchy and that of the ordinary man and woman are bound together and inseparable. Ian Mortimer is a historian and author whose books include The Time Traveller’s Guide to Medieval England (Vintage, 2009) DISCOVER MORE BOOK The Time Traveller’s Guide to Restoration Britain
by Ian Mortimer (Bodley Head, 2017)
AKG-IMAGES
dinarily, Cromwell had forbidden people from celebrating Christmas (believing it to be a mere superstition). As a result, shops were not allowed to close and church ministers were prevented from preaching on Christmas Day. People were not permitted to eat mince pies, plum porridge or brawn in December, or decorate their houses with boughs of holly and ivy, or sing carols or pass around the wassail bowl, or give children and servants treats in boxes (hence ‘Boxing Day’). Critics who thought this was going too far wrote tracts protesting the innocence of ‘Old Father Christmas’, who thus made his first appearance in English culture as a protest figure against puritanism. All this prohibition ended with the king’s return. As with sports, gambling, games and seasonal festivities, so too it was with music and the theatre. Although Cromwell didn’t ban music, it was removed from churches. The consequent disbandment of the cathedral choirs and the chapel royal and the layingoff of the court musicians were significant setbacks for the profession. Even popular music suffered: magistrates took action against the playing of lewd songs in public houses. The return of the king breathed new life into the art of music-making virtually overnight, as the court required a chapel royal staff and court musicians, and ordinary people went back to their old favourite songs and composed more of them without fear of reprimand. As for the theatres, these had all been closed in 1642. The Globe
Next month’s essay: Guy Halsall seeks to locate the historical King Arthur
40
BBC History Magazine
i i i i
The Rhinoceros and the Megatherium
Thundersticks
Charlemagne h l
An Essay in Natural History
Firearms and the Violent Transformation of Native America
Translated by Peter Lewis
Juan Pimentel
David J. Silverman
“The figure of Charlemagne provides a
Translated by Peter Mason “[Pimentel] has adeptly and eloquently brought back to life not only these two much-marvelled-at beasts but the minds of the people who sought to explain them and the worlds in which they lived.” —Times Higher Education
Johannes Fried
“Silverman’s book is a significant contribution way to look into the past and see how things ought to be in the present ... [a] to a field that is important for American
The Untold Story of the Talking Book Matthew Rubery “As this entertaining exploration shows, the story of audiobooks is as full of surprising and serendipitous turns as any
notably thorough, judicious study.”
engrossing work of fiction—whether read
western expansionism.”
— Literary Review
on the page or heard through headphones.”
—History Today
£25.00 | 9780674737396
— Financial Times
studies, for military history and work on
Belknap Press £22.95 | 9780674737471
£20.00 | 9780674545441
£25.00 | 9780674737129
HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS | www.hup.harvard.edu | email: [emailprotected] | twitter: @Harvard_Press
The Victorians
How the
Victorians ruined the world We think of our 19th-century ancestors as great engineers and scientists but, asks Kat Arney, did their innovations cause more problems than they solved? Accompanies the BBC Radio 4 series Did the Victorians Ruin the World?
They motored along the road to environmental disaster Today there are more than a billion cars worldwide, mostly powered by petrol or diesel engines, contributing to at least a tenth of global carbon dioxide emissions as well as other pollutants. On top of that, there are diesel-powered trains and ships, and those kerosene-burning jet planes. Yet the internal combustion engine wasn’t the only solution available to the Victorians. Stirling engines, powered by heat exchange, were a promising alternative. Running on any available fuel, from wood to cow dung, miniature versions could even be driven by the heat from a cup of tea. Victorian transport engineers also explored the potential of electric cars, as well as hydrogen engines. In the end, the convenience and flexibility of petrol cars won out, fuelled by a growing network of filling stations. But a shrinking pool of fossil fuels, along with environmental concerns, is encouraging today’s engineers to take a fresh look at some of these alternative technologies.
Siegfried Marcus’s pioneering motor car, pictured in c1870
42
A ‘Twycliffe’ flushing lavatory from the turn of the 20th century
They sent sewage down the pan One of the most notable inventions at that era-defining London expo, the Great Exhibition of 1851, was George Jennings’ water closet. Flushed with excitement at this toilet technology, many Londoners installed water-based loos in their homes, connecting them to surface drains. This might have made their lives less smelly but it wasn’t good news for everyone. Soon, the capital had become rife with cholera, prompting Sir Joseph Bazalgette to build the intercepting sewer system, along with impressive sewage pumping stations. This rush to flush meant that more sustainable low-water solutions, such as Henry Moule’s earth closet (1860), failed to flourish. But waterless toilets like the Loowatt are gaining ground today, providing safe sanitation and generating fertiliser and energy to boost the local economy in developing countries. Where there’s muck, there’s brass!
BBC History Magazine
BRIDGEMAN/GETTY IMAGES
The motor car traces its roots back to the 1860s, when Austrian inventor Siegfried Marcus built a pushcart powered by a gasoline-fuelled internal combustion engine. By the turn of the 20th century, cars were becoming increasingly popular, opening up rural areas and giving travellers a taste of true freedom.
They dabbled in the dark arts of social engineering In November 1859, barnacle-obsessive Charles Darwin published his most famous work: On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Darwin visualised life on Earth as a mighty tree, covering the world with its “ever branching and beautiful ramifications”. Since then, data from all fields of science has shown that natural selection is a powerful driver that shapes species. It’s an idea that is as simple as it is powerful, and an example of Victorian scientific thinking at its very best. But it was Darwin’s cousin, Francis Galton, who took this great theory too far. As well as inventing forensic fingerprinting and weather maps, Galton proposed that encouraging the most intelligent people to have children – while discouraging those at the lower end – would shift the curve and create a cleverer society. Coining the term ‘eugenics’ to describe his idea, Galton did not live to see it taken to grotesque extremes through the extermination of millions of Jews and other ethnic groups by the Nazis during the Holocaust. Eugenics was still practised in some forms well into the 20th century, including enforced sterilisation of ‘undesirables’ in the US and the enthusiastic promotion of birth control for native citizens living in British colonies.
An anthropologist measures a child’s cranium in Germany, 1932. Such practices were inspired by the eugenicist Francis Galton half a century earlier
TOPFOTO/ALAMY
The ey opened the doors to a little g ey invasion of Britain gre
When grey squirrels (like the one shown here) arrived in Britain in the 1870s, they sent their red cousins into rapid decline
BBC History Magazine
The Victorians were big fans of the natura al world, and wealthier citizens built grand museums, zoos, parks, aquariums and aviaries to display their b biological bounty. Acclimatisation societies sprang up, taking British animals and plants to the colonies to provide a taste of home in exotic climes s. Foreign species were introduced d to the UK in return, including Americ can grey squirrels and Japanese knotweed. The grey invaders quickly out-competed their native red cousins (as well as giviing them deadly squirrelpox), while J Japanese knotweed ran rampant acrosss the gardens of England. On the po ositive side, Charles Darwin engine eered a scheme to ‘re-green’ the de esolate south Atlantic island of Ascension. Although Darwin’s
experiment revealed how to bring ruined landscapes back to life, today’s conservationists are still struggling with the Victorian legacy of invasive species.
Dr Kat Arneyy is a science writer, broadcaster and author of Herding Hemingway’s Cats: Understanding How Our Genes Workk (Bloomsbury, 2016) DISCOVER MORE RADIO Kat Arney and her sister
Helen are presenting the Radio 4 series Did the Victorians Ruin the World? in April
43
Save when you subscribe to the digital edition
Available from
BBC History Magazine e is Britain’s bestselling history magazine. We feature leading historians writing lively and thought-provoking new takes on the great events of the past. past
Nuclear culture
W
MIRROR IMAGE
As nuclear tensions soared, a series of massive protests at Greenham Common made front-page news A new and potentially ruinous nuclear arms race was firmly back on the international agenda at the dawn of the 1980s. This was the decade of Ronald Reagan’s “evil empire” speech about the Soviet Union, of America’s ‘star wars’ defence project, and of Olympic boycotts. It was also the decade in which US Cruise missiles were stationed at Greenham Common in Berkshire. By the early 1980s, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) had amassed more than 100,000 members, and peace camps had sprung up near military bases such as Faslane in Argyll and Bute, and Upper Heyford in Oxfordshire. But, in
The threat of nuclear war caused countless sleepless nights in the 1980s, but it also inspired a remarkable flowering of culture
The Daily Mirror hails the “power of the women’s army” at Greenham Common in December 1982
50
BBC History Magazine
W
When the Wind Blows documented a couple’s doomed attempts to cheat death by nuclear fall-out
Ridicule greeted government advice on ke surviving a nuclear strike
MIRRORPIX/FOTOLIBRA/ALAMY
GETTY IMAGES
S
The prospect of armageddon cast a long shadow over novelists, film-makers, song-writers and comedians in the first half of the 1980s. Jonathan Hogg introduces eight cultural responses to Britons’ fixation with nuclear war as the Cold War grew more frosty
W AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY TY
ABSURDITY OF WAR
THE NUCLEAR
198
terms of size, none rivalled the women’s peace camp at Greenham Common. The first blockade here took place in May 1982 with h 250 women protesting. By the end off the year, that number had h d swollen ll to 30,000, with the women linking hands around the nine e miles off fencing that made up Greenham G Common’s perimeter. They also pinned baby clothes and a nappies to the fence to symbolise what they loved most. The sheer size of the e camp guaranteed it huge me edia coverage – as this Dailly Mi Mirror front page from 13 Dec cemberr 1982, which described h d the protests as “good-hum moured” and “remarkable”, testtifies. fi
One of the triggers for rising east-west tensions in the early 1980s was the US and UK’s implementation of a more assertive nuclear policy, championed by their bullish new leaders Margaret Thatche er and Ronald Reagan. Nuclear brinkmanship was once more a reality and, to many, a Third World War seemed increasingly likely. With this in mind, you might think the British public would have welcomed the government’s civil defence pamphlet Protect and Survive (1980), which attempted to reassure Britons that nuclear war wasn’t necessarily a death sentence – and that the bricks and mortar of their homes were the best defence against the bomb. Instead, when its contents emerged in the press, Protect and Survive was subjected to BBC History Magazine
a barrage of abuse from anti-nuclear activists and cultural commentators. Critics pointed to the futility of advising people to whitewash their windows to deflect the nuclear flash, and to use interior doors and furniture to create a makeshift fallout shelter. Ridiculing Protect and Survive as impractical and absurd, they ensured that it will always be remembered as an unmitigated PR disaster.
Of all the attacks on Protect and Survive (see left) perhaps none was more devastating than When the Wind Blows, Raymond Briggs’s bleak and touching graphic novel from 1982. On hearing that nuclear attack is imminent, the central characters, a lovable elderly couple called Jim and Hilda, follow the government’s civil defence advice to the letter. Yet it proves to be of little help to them as they slowly succumb to the invisible but devastating effects of radioactive fallout. The book was an emotive and humanising portrayal of the terrible effects of nuclear war, one given even more impact when Briggs’s book was made into an animated film in 1986.
Bleak and touching: Jim reads his self-help guide to surviving armageddon
511 5
Enjoy our Premium App experience now available from
Panel discussion
INTERVIEW
“Expertise is not a suit anymore” Janina Ramirez Fern Riddell is a cultural historian specialising in sex and suffrage
46
is a broadcaster and historian based at the University of Oxford
BBC History Magazine
just a man in What is it like to be a female historian in the 21st century? Ellie Cawthorne spoke to four leading academics about internet trolls, juggling work and family, and their plans to shake up the study of history PHOTOGRAPHY BY HELEN ATKINSON
Joann Fletcher is a broadcaster and writer, and an Egyptologist at the University of York BBC History Magazine
Anna Whitelock is a historian of royal and early modern history, based at Royal Holloway, University of London
47
Panel discussion
What do you think are the main challenges facing women working in academic and popular history in 2017? Janina Ramirez: I think that many of the challenges are the same as they’ve always been. I’m a mother and that’s had a huge impact on the amount of time I can work, and how much I can justify being away on big projects. But I think that things are changing. Social media also really helps – you can reach out and talk to people directly, even if you’re changing nappies or loading the dishwasher. Joann Fletcher: I totally agree – it’s a constant juggling act. When my daughter was young it was a real struggle to do the TV work, the media, the museum work and write books. But you had to do all of that if you wanted to progress. I think that there’s still an idea that women should be able to do it all, but it’s just not a level playing field. Fern Riddell: If you look at a male peer, a male academic in the same position, it’s not necessarily that things come easier to them, but there doesn’t seem to be the same pressure to show that you can do absolutely everything in order to be taken seriously. Anna Whitelock: Yes, young female academics now really are all-singing and all-dancing. But I think women in these positions also have a responsibility to be honest about their frailties. It’s important to realise that you don’t have to be perfect. And what are the particular challenges facing female historians on TV? AW: If you think about the origins of TV
When I first appeared on TV, the hate comments were unbelievably destructive. Really nasty personal comments all based on appearance JANINA RAMIREZ
48
history, it was very much a male preserve – both in terms of the presenters and the topics they covered. At the time I was doing my PhD, it was pretty much David Starkey and Simon Schama on TV, and they were almost interchangeable – the grey-haired, suited man was the model of authority. Female experts on TV have to have ‘a look’ – a USP almost – and justify their existence in a way that guys don’t have to. JR: Yes, I got called a Goth historian! I’ve never even listened to Goth music, but you have to have a tag. FR: When we think of our favourite male historians working in popular history – Dan Snow, Dan Jones or Greg Jenner – they don’t have PhDs. But all of the women do. I’ve been told that, while I can appear on TV as an expert, I can’t present programmes because I don’t have my PhD yet, and they need me to have that rubber stamp. JF: You’ve got to have all the bells and whistles. Every piece of armour you can possibly find. AW: This is a much broader issue – society at large has to start to change its idea of what authority and expertise is. It’s not just a man in a suit anymore. I actually think we are in an age of transition – we’re about to enter a golden age of female TV historians. If you look at the women working in popular history today, they are all so interesting and individual, and I think that’s increasingly what people want. Women are arguably making popular history even more accessible and engaging than men – they’re the kind of people you could go down the pub with. They’ve brought a new approach to TV history, which is not just simply top down, limited to one authority-voice and one perspective. Is there pressure on female academics to present themselves in a certain way on public platforms? JR: There are some really awkward issues to address here. When I first appeared on TV, my mum started searching for my name online, and the hate comments that appeared were unbelievably destructive. Really nasty personal comments all based on appearance: “She looks awful in that”; “She’s obviously not the first to the salad bar.” Immediately afterwards, I hid under the duvet and thought: “Why am I doing this?” Then I pulled the covers down and went, “Right. Sod it. Let’s get on with it.” FR: When I made my first TV appearance, I was so nervous I threw up in the bathroom five minutes before. My university had given me no guidance – I really had to teach myself. I work on the history of sex, so when I first started I felt a pressure to look really serious, because I was talking about subjects that
It’s all about moving the emphasis from top down history. If we start to take a macro view of history, then gender becomes less important ANNA WHITELOCK
would leave me open to criticism. But I quickly found that I was worse on camera because I was too restrained. JF: It’s important not to be scared of being yourself, warts and all. I don’t have social media – I do my own thing and if people like it, they like it. If they don’t, they don’t. I would die a thousand deaths if I had to dress up in a pink frilly frock just because I’m a woman. I’m often wandering around Egyptian monuments, and I want viewers to be looking at the beautiful objects of this amazing culture. I don’t want to be a distraction from that! As long as I’m there to present the information, that should be all that matters. But you are judged very differently. I’ll always remember AA Gill’s comments about Mary Beard. [In 2012, the critic jibed that the classics professor “should be kept away from cameras altogether” because of her appearance.] The vitriol that academic women of Mary’s calibre receive is unbelievable. In my case it’s never just been because I’m female – there’s a far bigger elephant in the room – I’m from the north. Even now, a few people say: “She’s from Barnsley and she’s an Egyptologist? She can’t be with that accent!” That snobbery drives me crazy. The majority of books and article pitches we receive at BBC History Magazine are authored by men. Why do you think that’s the case? JR: One simple reason is time. When I had my kids, I kept up my teaching and TV, but BBC History Magazine
my writing fell by the wayside. I just couldn’t get that sustained time at a desk; I couldn’t clear my head enough. JF: Yes, I wrote a biography of Nefertiti in a year. Then I had my daughter. My next book, a biography of Cleopatra, took me five years. AW: When we talk about men writing more than women, it’s important to highlight that we are talking about mainstream ‘trade’ books, rather than academic books. One recent factor could be the centenary of the First World War. Men tend to write about wars more, and those are often the books that sell in huge numbers. You also have to be incredibly courageous to publish mainstream books. Everyone will read the reviews; it’s all very public. Maybe women are more reluctant to put their heads above the parapet in that way. There are plenty of women specialising in social and royal history. But why don’t we see them as much covering military, economic or political history? FR: We do! There are some amazing women working in those fields. But they don’t get the same profile. If commissioners want someone to speak about economics or politics, they choose a man, because a male voice is seen to have more authority on those topics. JR: There’s a traditional way of commissioning those sorts of programmes for TV. And, in book publishing, there’s a traditional market who want to be satisfied with a traditional approach. But I think those traditional forms of media are now breaking down.
If commissioners want someone to speak about economics or politics, they choose a male voice, because it is seen to have more authority FERN RIDDELL BBC History Magazine
out of it. You could say I ‘feminised’ the military history. AW: It’s also about changing the emphasis of history and taking the spotlight off the principal agents – which, in most western cultures, were men. Whether we like it or not, men were the soldiers, leaders and politicians, and it’s their voices in the historical record. But if we start to take a more macro view of history in the round, then gender becomes less important. I don’t think the next generation will have such a strong sense of studying ‘men’s history’ or ‘women’s history’.
It’s important to be yourself, warts and all. I would die a thousand deaths if I had to dress up in a pink frilly frock on television JOANN FLETCHER
Should we be doing more to highlight female historical figures and ‘women’s history’ topics? JF: My last book was a history of ancient Egypt. I wrote it because I was sick to the back teeth of every single history of Egypt – brilliant though they might be – seemingly suggesting every single ancient Egyptian was a man. Ancient Egyptian society was far more equal than others, so I decided to tell the whole story, and discuss all Egyptians. Then you get a very different kind of history. AW: I’ve always felt slightly conflicted about the idea of ‘women’s history’. I understand why you would want to highlight the role of women, but the point is that they need to be situated back into the mainstream narrative. Shouldn’t it all be much more integrated? FR: I never wanted to be a ‘women’s historian’ for exactly that reason. I’ve ended up as a sex and suffrage historian, but because I wasn’t trained in the ‘women’s history’ discipline, I think it has given me a different perspective on the subject. I look at suffrage violence, bombings and arson attacks. It challenges people’s perceptions: ‘women’s history’ isn’t just about ladies sitting around or breaking a few windows. JR: I guess I did the opposite with my series on the Hundred Years’ War. While I covered battles, weapons and troop formations, I also gave a cultural dimension to all the military stuff, looking at the art and music that came
How can we ensure female historians are better represented in the future? JR: People have suggested positive discrimination, but that idea gives me goosebumps. I can’t see how it’s helpful in any real terms. FR: As women, I think we have to be much more supportive of each other. It has predominantly been other women that have torn me down, and I think that’s something that we need to change. Because we have to claw so hard to get there, we also have to leave room for others to come up alongside us. AW: There’s a line to walk between absolutely championing the charge of women, and being realistic. I don’t actually think we should be worrying about getting more women into history. Young women are doing history; female students certainly dominate in the classes I run. Instead we should focus on encouraging all young people – whether male or female – to value history as a discipline. JF: It’s just about equality – equality in the classroom, on the TV screen, on social media. But also equality in how we express, describe and put history out there. Then I think it will filter through, and in 10 years’ time, we won’t be having these debates. People will look back at us having this discussion and we’ll look like a bunch of dinosaurs in crinolines. JR: These things take time to evolve. But we’re historians – we know how to do patience. DISCOVER MORE SOCIAL MEDIA Would you like to see more female
historians on TV? Share your thoughts with us on Twitter or Facebook LISTEN AGAIN You can catch up with a lecture
that Mary Beard gave recently on women in power (broadcast on Radio 4) at bbc.co.uk/programmes/b08gx81w ON THE PODCAST
You can listen to an extended version of this interview on our weekly podcast, at historyextra.com/podcasts
49
Nuclear culture
The threat of nuclear war caused countless sleepless nights in the 1980s, but it also inspired a remarkable flowering of culture
THE NUCLEAR
S
The prospect of armageddon cast a long shadow over novelists, film-makers, song-writers and comedians in the first half of the 1980s. Jonathan Hogg introduces eight cultural responses to Britons’ fixation with nuclear war as the Cold War grew more frosty 50
BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES
198
W
MIRROR IMAGE
As nuclear tensions soared, a series of massive protests at Greenham Common made front-page news A new and potentially ruinous nuclear arms race was firmly back on the international agenda at the dawn of the 1980s. This was the decade of Ronald Reagan’s “evil empire” speech about the Soviet Union, of America’s ‘star wars’ defence project, and of Olympic boycotts. It was also the decade in which US Cruise missiles were stationed at Greenham Common in Berkshire. By the early 1980s, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) had amassed more than 100,000 members, and peace camps had sprung up near military bases such as Faslane in Argyll and Bute, and Upper Heyford in Oxfordshire. But, in
terms of size, none rivalled the women’s peace camp at Greenham Common. The first blockade here took place in May 1982 with 250 women protesting. By the end of the year, that number had swollen to 30,000, with the women linking hands around the nine miles of fencing that made up Greenham Common’s perimeter. They also pinned baby clothes and nappies to the fence to symbolise what they loved most. The sheer size of the camp guaranteed it huge media coverage – as this Daily Mirror front page from 13 December 1982, which described the protests as “good-humoured” and “remarkable”, testifies.
The Daily Mirror hails the “power of the women’s army” at Greenham Common in December 1982
W
W AN EXERCISE IN FUTILITY
ABSURDITY OF WAR
When the Wind Blows documented a couple’s doomed attempts to cheat death by nuclear fall-out
MIRRORPIX/FOTOLIBRA/ALAMY
Ridicule greeted government advice on surviving a nuclear strike ke One of the triggers for rising east-west tensions in the early 1980s was the US and UK’s implementation of a more assertive nuclear policy, championed by their bullish er new leaders Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan. Nuclear brinkmanship was once more a reality and, to many, a Third World War seemed increasingly likely. With this in mind, you might think the British public would have welcomed the government’s civil defence pamphlet Protect and Survive (1980), which attempted to reassure Britons that nuclear war wasn’t necessarily a death sentence – and that the bricks and mortar of their homes were the best defence against the bomb. Instead, when its contents emerged in the press, Protect and Survive was subjected to BBC History Magazine
a barrage of abuse from anti-nuclear activists and cultural commentators. Critics pointed to the futility of advising people to whitewash their windows to deflect the nuclear flash, and to use interior doors and furniture to create a makeshift fallout shelter. Ridiculing Protect and Survive as impractical and absurd, they ensured that it will always be remembered as an unmitigated PR disaster.
Of all the attacks on Protect and Survive (see left) perhaps none was more devastating than When the Wind Blows, Raymond Briggs’s bleak and touching graphic novel from 1982. On hearing that nuclear attack is imminent, the central characters, a lovable elderly couple called Jim and Hilda, follow the government’s civil defence advice to the letter. Yet it proves to be of little help to them as they slowly succumb to the invisible but devastating effects of radioactive fallout. The book was an emotive and humanising portrayal of the terrible effects of nuclear war, one given even more impact when Briggs’s book was made into an animated film in 1986.
Bleak and touching: Jim reads his self-help guide to surviving armageddon
51
W
Nuclear culture
NIGHTMARE SCENARIO
Threads pulled no punches in its depiction of the horrors of a nuclear winter Perhaps more than any other decade in the Cold War era, the 1980s gave voice to novelists, script-writers and musicians with the artistry and imagination to depict what would happen if the unthinkable became a reality. Of all their many creations across the decade, surely none was as unsparingly brutal as Threads. First aired on BBC Two on 23 September 1984, this vision of a Sheffield shattered by the bomb immediately transported its 7 million viewers into the midst of a nuclear winter – a post-apocalyptic nightmare shot in an ultra-realistic docudrama style. Director Mick Jackson and writer Barry Hines’s creation was defined by the failure of civil defence, the breakdown of law and order and the destruction of community. And, as it traced the horrors confronting young couple Ruth Beckett and Jimmy Kemp, Threads went where few depictions of nuclear war would tread: the prolonged effects of radioactive contamination and the grim reality of genetic mutation.
W
ALAMY
A mother holds her child in Threads, one of the most shocking dramas to appear on British TV in the 1980s
W
VIOLENCE, SELFISHNESS, DESPERATION
A German-language single about an accidental nuclear war came chillingly close to the truth
Humanity came under attack in the youth novel Brother in the Land Like Threads, Robert Swindells’ youth novel Brother in the Land (1984) did not shy away from the human cost of nuclear war. The book follows the central character Danny, a teenager who is struggling to survive with the remnants of his family following a nuclear strike. Danny represents a peaceful, humane response to the social upheaval that nuclear war has wrought. But it is clear that he will need to contend with the violence, selfishness and desperation that defined many people’s adaptation to a country ruined by war.
52
PROTEST SONGS
Young Danny confronts an unimaginably bleak future in Brother in the Land
As anyone who watched the recent German drama Deutschland 83 will attest, nuclear paranoia inspired some of the best pop music of the eighties. Everyone from The Clash and Queen to Frankie Goes to Hollywood and The Specials were moved to put their fears of living “in the shadow of the mushroom cloud” (as Queen’s Freddie Mercury sang in ‘Hammer to Fall’) to music. Some songs, such as ‘99 Red Balloons’, German pop star Nena’s tale of a nuclear war starting by mistake, transcended national borders. Originally released in Germany, the English translation became a worldwide hit, topping the UK charts in March 1984. She couldn’t have known it at the time, but BBC History Magazine
W GROWING CONCERNS Adrian Mole, aged 13¾, fretted about spots and Soviet bombs Not all eighties art was imbued with foreboding and menace. Some novelists employed comedy and satire to undermine the tensions that stalked the decade – among them Sue Townsend, author of the Adrian Mole series. Adrian Mole brilliantly evoked the anxieties that confronted teenagers in the 1980s. Alongside girls, spots, growing up and sitting exams, Adrian was preoccupied with nuclear war. In The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole Aged 13¾ (1982), Townsend cleverly intertwined her young hero’s concerns. Adrian believed that arguments within his family were caused by the pressures of living in the nuclear age – pressures that saw his mother threaten to move the family to a remote part of Wales in order to survive the apocalypse. Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan in their Spitting Image pomp
BLACK COMEDY
W GETTY IMAGES/SHUTTERSTCOK/REX
Some of the eighties’ most popular TV shows endeavoured to raise a laugh from the prospect of humanity’s destruction
Adrian Mole contemplates nuclear war – or is it his girlfriend, Pandora? – in the TV adaptation of Sue Townsend’s books, 1987
From rock gods to royalty, and sports stars to supermodels, few public figures escaped Spitting Image’s satirical swipe. This mainstay of British culture prided itself on capturing the political zeitgeist of the 1980s. And so it proved in one 1984 episode, which saw Margaret Thatcher and Michael Heseltine (or at least their rubber puppet doubles) concocting a plan to make political capital out of public alarm over nuclear war. Spitting Image wasn’t the only comedy to find the funny side of
escalating nuclear tensions – one 1981 episode of Only Fools and Horses was set almost entirely in a fallout shelter bought by Del Boy. Yet, by the second half of the decade, with Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev extending the hand of friendship to the west, Britain’s comedy writers were increasingly forced to look elsewhere for inspiration. Cold War tensions were waning fast – and nuclear paranoia’s impact on Britain’s cultural output was waning too.
Nena took ‘99 Red Balloons’ to the top of the charts around the world
Nena’s lyrics were chillingly redolent of a real-life nuclear incident that had occurred just months before her single reached UK number one. In November 1983, the Soviet Union readied its forces for war after erroneously interpreting a Nato military exercise, known as ‘Able Archer’, as a genuine attack. The vast majority of Britons were oblivious but many experts believe that Able Archer was the nearest that the world has come to a nuclear war this side of the Cuban missile crisis.
BBC History Magazine
Jonathan Hogg is a senior lecturer in history at the University of Liverpool
DISCOVER MORE BOOK British Nuclear Culture:
Official and Unofficial Narratives in the Long 20th Century by Jonathan Hogg (Bloomsbury, 2016)
53
The Tudor lord protector
With Henry VIII dead and his son, Edward VI, a mere boy, Edward Seymour assumed power, seeking to govern England as a radical autocrat. But, writes Derek Wilson, when two rebellions erupted, Seymour vacillated – and that was to cost him his life
THE FALL OF THE
DITHERING DICTATOR
54
brother of Henry’s beloved third wife Jane, to step seamlessly into the vacuum created by the old king’s death. With Henry’s son and heir, Edward VI, too young to rule in his own right, Seymour had himself appointed Protector of the Realm. For the next two years, he was the de facto ruler of England. But by the time Paget dispatched his missive, Seymour’s fortunes had taken a nosedive. His powerbase was crumbling, the country was in revolt and his enemies were sharpening their knives. Within a few months he would be thrown into the Tower of London, languishing there while his fellow councillors decided what to do with him.
Festering divisions So where did it all go wrong? The answer can probably be located in the divisions that festered in the second half of Henry VIII’s reign. The religious reformation that Henry had begun sundered England into violently opposed religious camps. There were radical Protestants who wanted to push reform further, and conservatives who craved a
BRIDGEMAN
O
n 7 July 1549, Sir William Paget, secretary to the royal council, wrote a letter to Edward Seymour, Duke of Somerset. “I see at hand the king’s destruction and your ruin,” Paget declared. “The people are out of discipline because of your softness… I know your good meaning but it is a pity it should have caused the present evil. Society is maintained by religion and laws: you have neither.” As denunciations go, Paget’s was devastating. And it was made all the more damaging by the fact that he was merely communicating what had become an open secret in aristocratic circles: Edward Seymour – regent to the boy-king Edward VI, self-styled autocrat and the most powerful man in England – was heading for a fall. How different things had seemed a couple of years earlier when King Henry VIII had breathed his last. Then Seymour had capitalised on his status as a powerful magnate, influential court insider, and
BBC History Magazine
Soft power Edward Seymour shown in a portrait by Hans Holbein the Younger. Appointed Protector of the Realm because Edward VI was too young to rule in his own right, Seymour attempted to model his leadership style on Henry VIII but lacked the old king’s ruthlessness
BBC History Magazine
55
The Tudor lord protector
Hero of the have-nots The historian Diarmaid MacCulloch has written of Edward Seymour that he “combined the reforming zeal of Thomas Cromwell, the chutzpah of Cardinal Wolsey and the flashy populism of Queen Elizabeth’s doomed Earl of Essex”. At first, that “flashy populism” appears to have borne fruit. Declaring that he was committed to creating a fair society, Seymour appointed royal commissions to enquire into such agrarian grievances as the enclosure of the common land. In doing so, he made himself something of a hero among the disenfranchised: England’s ‘have-nots’ genuinely believed that the ‘Good Duke’, as they called Seymour, was on their side. Unfortunately for Seymour, a growing number of these ‘have-nots’ began interpreting his policies as a cue to take the law into their own hands. Following his lead – or so they thought – bands of iconoclasts started smashing up church windows and tearing down rood screens. Other malcontents uprooted the hedges and fences built by ‘grasping’ landowners – reclaiming land they thought was rightfully theirs. It was now that Seymour betrayed a weakness that would continually undermine his attempts to dominate England’s political landscape: an unwillingness to meet force with force. He issued pardons to offenders, promised new legislation and, as Paget later pointed out, only encouraged further lawlessness. So it proved when a rebellion broke out in the South West, where militant conservatives began protesting at the government’s religious policy and the 56
Seymour consulted the council less and less and ruled by decree in his nephew’s name ABOVE: A portrait of Edward VI’s mother, Jane Seymour. Her marriage to Henry VIII made her elder brother, Edward, a powerful man
attempt to force an English Prayer Book on Devon and Cornwall. On 2 July 1549, 2,000 rebels laid siege to Exeter. It was not only in the shires that Seymour faced problems. His autocratic style had alienated several members of the council in London, whose support he now needed. He did not dare leave the capital himself but he did not know which of his conciliar colleagues he could trust with an army. On 9 July, Lord Russell, sent to quell the western rebellion, halted at Honiton, refusing to advance on Exeter until Seymour sent reinforcements. At the same time a commotion at Wymondham, Norfolk, involving the breaking of hedges, turned into a mass movement when Robert Kett, a landowner of moderate means, accepted the leadership of the rebels and set off to attack Norwich, then the second largest city in England. By 11 July he had amassed a force of 16,000 followers and set up camp on Mousehold Heath, close by the city. When news of this and other disturbances reached London the following day, the city was placed under martial law. The capital was wracked by mounting fear of demonstrations of sympathy for the rebels. Seymour, meanwhile, was with King Edward at Hampton Court and under virtual siege. Landowners demanded that he take
action against unruly tenants, and his councillors urged him to send troops to the trouble spots to make examples of rebel ringleaders. Instead, he hesitated. On the night of 21–22 July, Kett’s ‘army’ attacked Norwich, bombarding the city with confiscated cannon. His men stormed through breaches in the wall and, fighting their way hand-to-hand through the narrow streets, reached the market place. Kett set up his own court, passing judgment on prisoners dragged before him and authorising foraging parties to commandeer provisions from houses and surrounding farms. He sent the government an ultimatum of 29 demands, insisting that they were in line with Seymour’s policy, and directed only against landowners who were “enemies of king and commonwealth”. Once again, Seymour dithered. It was the 28th before he sent a mere 1,300 mercenaries and local levies, under the command of William Parr, Marquess of Northampton, to face Kett’s vastly superior force. Parr had little military experience, and it showed. Soon after Parr’s arrival, Kett’s army attacked, inflicting on Parr a humiliating defeat. An eyewitness described the scene: “Lamentable and miserable was the state of the city at this time when nothing was seen or heard but lamentation and weeping… the clashing of weapons, the flames of the burning, the ruin and fall of houses, and many other fearful things which… struck with incredible sorrow the hearts and ears of all that heard it.”
Too little, too late Now, at last, Seymour seems to have stirred from his stupor. Fearing that Kett’s army would march on London, he doubled the guard on the city gates, set up gibbets as a warning to disaffected citizens and instructed the bishop of London to preach at St Paul’s that “those who resist temporal authority resist God’s ordinance, and are utterly damned. The rebels deserve death as traitors and receive eternal damnation with Lucifer.” But for most members of the political class, Seymour’s intervention was too little, too late. With the capital in a state of panic, several councillors now abandoned him, quitting Hampton Court and meeting in Westminster – to all intents and purposes a rival government. However, better news for Seymour came from the West Country. Russell, having been granted reinforcements, defeated the rebels at Fenny Bridges, Clyst Heath and Clyst St Mary and raised the siege of Exeter. He arrived none too soon. A contemporary chronicle related the suffering of Exeter’s besieged citizens: “Many assaults and sundry skirmishes were made, the gates set afire, the walls underBBC History Magazine
BRIDGEMAN
return to the ‘good old (Catholic) days’. There were also social reformers who opposed many of the new landlords who had acquired land during Henry’s dissolution of the monasteries and were, it was claimed, riding roughshod over the rights of the common people. At his death in 1547, Henry had left power in the hands of a moderately reformist body that was to act as Edward VI’s council until he reached 18. However, in the back rooms of Whitehall where secret deals were done, it was agreed that much of that power should be concentrated in one man’s hands: Seymour. Over the centuries historians have offered many explanations as to why the councillors agreed to Seymour’s power-grab – including the need for a strong government to fend off any conservative reaction, the fact that Seymour was Edward VI’s uncle, and the dishing out of sweeteners to pliable supporters. Whatever the reason, Seymour was now Protector of the Realm. Soon, he was consulting the council less and less and ruling by decree in his nephew’s name.
A shepherd shown in a (colourised) illustration of Edmund Spenser’s 1579 poem The Shepheardes Calender. In the early days of Edward Seymour’s regency, many of the agricultural poor were won over by his promises to address the enclosure of common land
ALAMY/BRIDGEMAN/GETTY IMAGES
LEFT:: William Parr, whose army met h defeat at the hands of Kett’s with bels, who are shown (below) reb meeting at the Oak of Reformam tion near Norwich in 1549
ABOVE: A plaque in St Ives commemorating those who died during the Prayer Book Rebellion. About 900 had their throats cut on the orders of Seymour’s general Lord Russell (right) BBC History Magazine
57
The Tudor lord protector
Seymour fled by night with King Edward to Windsor, calling on all loyal Englishmen to come to his aid. It was a forlorn hope
Edward VI: the pitiless king Did the young king revel in his uncle’s disgrace? We can’t be sure what was going through Edward’s mind as Seymour lurched from one disaster to the next in the autumn of 1549. But an extract from his diary gives us a clue. In it the king relates how the London councillors sent him “A very gentle letter… to declare [the Protector’s] faults, ambitions, vainglory, entering into rash wars in my youth… enriching himself from my treasure, following his own opinions and doing all by his own authority, etc. [The next day] the lords came to Windsor, took him and brought him through Holborn to the Tower.” Edward’s tone is emotionless, with no suggestion of regret for his uncle’s fate. So did he resent Seymour’s control? Edward was an orphan. The boy’s only close relatives were his uncles, Edward and Thomas Seymour. In the game of thrones that was Tudor politics, they both played for the highest stakes. Thomas was a charmer. He married Henry VIII’s widow, Katherine Parr, and had designs on Princess Elizabeth. He also courted the boy king’s friendship by giving him money and pointing out how badly the protector treated him. As for Edward Seymour, he kept young Edward on a tight rein, restricting access to his royal charge and planting spies in the royal household who informed him about everyone who approached the king. The tactic may have worked in the short term. But Edward VI, no less than Seymour himself, took the wilful Henry VIII as his model. Now, it appears that he was ready to cast off Seymour’s avuncular tutelage.
58
Rival armies By now, order was also being restored in eastern England – though, unfortunately for Seymour, one of his greatest rivals would take the credit. At the end of August, John Dudley, Earl of Warwick – at the head of an army of 10,000 levies, fortified by a further thousand German mercenaries – seized Norwich, cut Kett’s supply lines and confronted him at nearby Dussindale. In the resulting battle, hundreds of peasants were slain. Dudley returned to London a hero. As his mercenaries set up camp outside the city, the “ruin” that William Paget had predicted for Edward Seymour in his letter of 7 July appeared an inevitability. Feeling himself increasingly isolated, Seymour ordered all armed levies to be stood down. The Westminster councillors ignored him. The next few weeks saw the rival governments at Hampton and Westminster locked in stalemate. On 5 October, Seymour, now panicking, sent a flurry of messages to local officials ordering them to come to Hampton Court with as many armed men as possible, “to defend the king and the lord protector, against whom a most dangerous conspiracy has been attempted”. The accusation of treason galvanised Seymour’s rivals into action. Astonished Londoners saw them processing through the city “weaponed and had their servants likewise weaponed, attending upon them in new liveries”. Seymour responded by ordering
the lieutenant of the Tower of London, Sir John Markham, to hold the fortress against the rebels. Instead, Markham handed it to the councillors. Seymour now fled by night with the king to Windsor, calling on all loyal Englishmen to come to his aid. It was a forlorn hope. The force was now decidedly with Seymour’s opponents. The protectorate was all but over and on 14 October Seymour was escorted to the Tower. But that wasn’t the end of the story. In 1550, Seymour made a dramatic return to the council, and there he might have stayed if he had been content to accept a subordinate position to his old comrade-in-arms, John Dudley. He was not. Seymour was drawn into personal rivalries within the council – and he lost. In January 1552, the man who had held England’s fate in his hands just a few years earlier, was executed for trying to overthrow Dudley. By any standards, Seymour’s fall from grace was precipitous. Its root cause may have been his attempt to imitate Henry VIII’s model of absolute rule. The trouble is, Seymour was not Henry. He lacked the king’s legitimacy and, above all, his ruthlessness. Seymour was plagued by contradictions. He declared his opposition to money-grubbing landowners, but spent hugely on a new London palace – Somerset House – and other grandiose projects. He abhorred violence but was indirectly responsible for thousands of deaths. When firm action was required, he wavered. All this alienated England’s political class. And when they withdrew their support, Seymour was doomed.
Derek Wilson is a historian and novelist. His books include The Plantagenets: The Kings that Made Britain (Quercus, 2014) and The Devil’s Chalice (MadeGlobal Publishing, 2016), a novel based around Kett’s rebellion DISCOVER MORE SPECIAL EDITION MAGAZINE Read more about 16th-century England in
our special edition The Story of the Tudors. For more details, go to buysubscriptions.com/ special-editions/the-story-of-the-tudors BBC History Magazine
ALAMY
Edward VI seems to have been totally untroubled by Seymour’s downfall
mined, the suburbs burned and divers killed… the citizens, having no bread, were driven… to eat bread made of bran and worse and the prisoners in the gaol… were fed with horseflesh.” If William Parr was condemned for weakness at Norwich, Russell was soon being accused of undue brutality. At Clyst Heath the commander ordered 900 bound prisoners to have their throats cut. Russell pursued the king’s enemies over a wide area and hanged those he hunted down in places as far away as Minehead and Bath. On entering Exeter, he unleashed vengeance so gruesome that it appalled even seasoned warriors. It is estimated that the Prayer Book Rebellion cost 5,500 lives.
History: gossip well told Elbert Hubbard
• Enjoy over 300 history talks and visits every year through our branch network • Learn through an online library of over 400 history podcasts, pamphlets, articles and publications • Explore The Historian magazine – offering in-depth, accessible and enjoyable articles • Plus members’ magazine HA News and e-newsletters packed with news, competitions and more Membership from £37 plus 2 months free
Join today
Discover more with Historical Association membership
0300 100 0223 Quote: BGO17
history.org.uk/go/mems
Biography Master’s in
January 2017 - December 2017 A unique one-year programme, directed by Professor Jane Ridley, one of Britain’s most eminent historical biographers - providing a comprehensive introduction to the biographer’s art. The course is based in central London and may be taken either as a research programme
(leading to a dissertation), or as a taught course. Part-time study is also available. For further details, Google ‘Buckingham Biography’ or go to www.buckingham.ac.uk/london/ biography
For course enquiries and applications, contact: Maria Floyd, Admissions Officer on 01280 827514 E: [emailprotected] or the Course Director, Jane Ridley E: [emailprotected]
THE UNIVERSITY OF
BUCKINGHAM
LONDON PROGRAMMES
ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE
THE 2017
HERITAGE GUIDE 2017 is set to be another great year for historical anniversaries. There are also a number of key events, exhibitions and festivals to enjoy throughout the year. Why not explore and support some of the heritage sites Britain has to offer for this year?
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
HISTORIC ROYAL PALACES
M
embership to Historic Royal Palaces is a brilliant way to explore all six historic royal palaces and it’s fantastic value for money. Your membership would cover entry into the Tower of London, Hampton Court Palace, the Banqueting House, Kensington Palace, Kew Palace and Hillsborough Castle. All of which are packed full of great days out and opportunities for families to really spend quality time together. You can see Rubens’ ceiling – a 17th century masterpiece – at Banqueting House, then unearth the stories of queens, kings, princesses and princes who resided at the Tower of London, Hampton Court Palace, Kew Palace and Hillsborough Castle. Celebrate the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, in the major new dress exhibition at Kensington Palace, Diana: Her Fashion Story. Trace the evolution of the Princess’s style, from the demure, romantic outfits of her first public appearances, to the glamour, elegance and
020 3166 6327 www.hrp.org.uk
confidence of her later life. Don’t miss an extraordinary collection of garments, including the iconic velvet gown, famously worn at the White House when the Princess danced with John Travolta. As well as unlimited access to all six palaces, members also get a host of fabulous benefits to enjoy all year round including an exclusive member event calendar, 10% discount in our shops, restaurants and cafes and much, much more! Membership is great value for money and you only need to make one visit to each palace to save money, so become a member today and get to know these palaces better. Historic Royal Palaces is the independent charity that looks after all six palaces. We receive no funding from the Government or the Crown, so we depend on the support of our visitors, members, donors, volunteers and sponsors. We look forward to welcoming you to our historic royal family. Join as a member today, prices start from £50.
Advertisement Feature
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
SS GREAT BRITAIN
O
ne of the most important historic ships in the world, Brunel’s SS Great Britain has enjoyed 170 years of adventure, travelled a million miles at sea and has been around the world an incredible 32 times. Discover the greatest innovation of the Victorian age and explore the ship that changed the way we travel today. Get closer to history in the Brunel Institute, a world-class archive and library, as maritime curators and volunteers take you on a journey of discovery with rare and original artefacts from the Archive Vault. Join us for a new volunteerled talk and explore one of the most fascinating aspects of the SS Great Britain’s story: the gold
0117 926 0680 www.ssgreatbritain.org
rush. The new talks will delve into the first voyage to Australia and recount the experiences of passengers going in search of fortune in the new world. Tales include murder, mystery, life changing success and spectacular failure. Explore steerage with the new third class passenger experience, inspired by the ship’s first voyage to Australia in 1852. Informed by our archive material costumed characters, soundscapes and stupendous stenches have been added below deck, where third-class had to endure months at sea packed into hot and noisy steerage bunks. Tickets to Brunel’s SS Great Britain include free unlimited return visits for a year.
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
JUTLAND LEGACY CONFERENCE
31 MAY TO 2 JUNE 2017
AT PORTSMOUTH HISTORIC DOCKYARD LOOKING BEYOND THE FIRST WORLD WAR’S GREATEST NAVAL BATTLE THREE-DAY PROGRAMME TICKETS START FROM £75 PER PERSON DAY TICKETS AVAILABLE
REGISTER NOW
NMRN.ORG.UK/JUTLAND-CONFERENCE
CALL 0330 123 3544
JORVIK VIKING CENTRE RETURN OF THE VIKINGS
T
01904 615505 www.jorvikvikingcentre.co.uk
he year is AD960 and the last Viking King in Jorvik, Eric Bloodaxe, has been banished. The city is thriving with a flourishing manufacturing centre and wide trading links. There are new buildings, new peoples and new stories to be told... The world-famous JORVIK Viking Centre will reopen on Saturday 8th April 2017 after a multi-million pound re-imagining. Hop aboard the improved ride experience and be transported back in time over 1,000 years! You will discover the impact of international trade on Viking-Age York, including the evolution of a multicultural society in the city, as it’s not just trade goods that flowed into Jorvik but people from across the globe! Plus, with 22 new animatronics across the
recreation there is something new to see around every corner. The gallery experiences have been completely updated, with new display cases allowing you to get up close to the astounding Viking artefacts that inspired the creation of JORVIK. You will have the chance to dig deeper into the Viking story of York using the latest in cutting-edge technology located throughout the centre.
WHAT’S NEW? • New Ride experience with the sights, sounds and of course, smells, of the Viking-Age • Updated historical interpretation, showcasing the cultural ‘melting pot’ of 10thcentury York • The latest cutting edge technology bringing the Viking period to life!
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
JANE AUSTEN 200
T
he year 2017 marks the 200th anniversary of the death of the universally admired author Jane Austen. Jane spent most of her life in the historic and beautiful county of Hampshire: its houses, countryside and people provided inspiration for many of her novels. Hampshire Cultural Trust is coordinating a yearlong programme of events including exhibitions, performances, walks and talks, to celebrate Jane’s extraordinary creativity and talent. One of the highlights of the year’s programme is a landmark exhibition at Winchester Discovery Centre, The Mysterious Miss Austen. Presented by Hampshire Cultural Trust in conjunction with Jane Austen’s House Museum, the exhibition explores the author’s work, life and
[emailprotected] www.janeausten200.co.uk
relationship to Hampshire. The centrepiece will be five portraits of Jane together under one roof for the very first time, including one which has not been seen in public for more than 40 years. Of the handful of items that survive today worldwide which actually belonged to Jane and can be traced directly back to her, on show will be her silk pelisse coat and embroidered purse. The exhibition runs from 13 May – 24 July, and admission is free. There are also two sister exhibitions on Austen’s life and works, Retail and Romance: Jane Goes to the Ball at the Willis Museum in Basingstoke, and The Navy at the time of Jane Austen at the Gallery in Gosport. Details of these and the full programme of celebratory events in Hampshire during 2017 can be found on the Jane Austen 200 website.
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
KELMSCOTT MANOR 1 APR - 28 OCT
K
elmcott Manor is the inspirational Cotswolds retreat of William Morris. Explore the historic manor loved by William Morris, Father of the Arts & Crafts Movement. This historic house showcases personal collections of the Morris family, including creations by William Morris, artworks by Pre-Raphaelite artist Dante Gabriel Rossetti, furniture by Philip Webb and so much more. Visitors can explore the Manor’s enchanting gardens, farm buildings and surrounding grounds, or enjoy lunch in our tearoom. Families are welcome, and we host family-friendly activity days throughout the season. Open on Wednesdays and Saturdays, April to October.
www.kelmscottmanor.org.uk
+44 (0)1367 252486
BOSWORTH BATTLEFIELD HERITAGE CENTRE & COUNTRY PARK
B
osworth Battlefield Heritage Centre tells the dramatic story of the Battle of Bosworth on 22nd August 1485, which marked a major turning point in English History. Discover more about the battle of 1485 where Richard III fought for his crown and lost his life, and Henry Tudor became King. With interactive, hands-on displays you can find out more about medieval warfare, how the battle unfolded and the impact of the new and powerful Tudor dynasty. Explore the landscape with our expert battlefield guides or see the site really come to life at our Battle of Bosworth Anniversary Weekend on 19th & 20th August.
www.bosworthbattlefield.org.uk
01455 290429
SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES OF LONDON EXHIBITION 24 JUL - 25 AUG
F
ounded in London in 1707, the Society of Antiquaries of London has been concerned with collecting, conserving, recording and studying the material past for more than 300 years. Located in Burlington House – a centre of art, history and science – the Society owns the largest collection of English medieval and Tudor royal portraiture outside of the National Portrait Gallery. The summer exhibition will showcase the Society’s Tudor portraits alongside items from its Library and Accredited Museum collections. Visitors can also enjoy monthly guided tours and free public lectures on a variety of topics.
www.sal.org.uk
+44 (0)20 7479 7080
WESTMINSTER ABBEY ASSOCIATION
B
e part of our future. Westminster Abbey is one of the nation’s most important buildings and the greatest repository of British history. Now, for the first time in 1000 years, you can experience more with membership of the Westminster Abbey Association. Join today and benefit from: • Free and unlimited entry to the Abbey • 10% discount in the Abbey shop and the Cellarium café • Exclusive events and priority notification about selected public services • The Association newsletter and the Dean’s Christmas letter • A chance to win two tickets to the Abbey’s Christmas services each year
[emailprotected]
020 7654 4843
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
WINDOWS TO ANOTHER WORLD Discover a new view of life in this powerful medieval monastery.
Helmsley, North Yorkshire YO62 5LB
The English Heritage Trust is a charity, no. 1140351, and a company, no. 07447221, registered in England.
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
ARBEIA ROMAN FORT
SEGEDUNUM ROMAN FORT
tanding above the entrance to the River Tyne, Arbeia Roman Fort guarded the main sea route to Hadrian’s Wall. It was a key garrison and military supply base to other forts along the Wall and is an important part of the history of Roman Britain. Have a look inside the full-scale reconstructed Roman buildings including the West Gate and Commanding Officer’s house and a soldier’s barrack blocks. Visitors can also see one of the finest collections of finds from Roman Britain. Stories are brought to life through events and displays including gladiator battles, falconry displays, Roman re-enactments, storytelling and more.
S
S
www.arbeiaromanfort.org.uk
www.segedunumromanfort.org.uk
0191 277 1410
egedunum, which means ‘Strong Fort’, was built to guard the eastern end of Hadrian’s Wall, and housed 600 Roman soldiers. It stood for almost 300 years as a symbol of Roman rule and a bastion against barbarian attack. Today, Segedunum is a major site on Hadrian’s Wall. It is the most excavated fort along the Wall with surviving foundations of many buildings and part of the Wall itself. Segedunum features recently rediscovered Roman bath house foundations, a recreated stretch of Hadrian’s Wall and an iconic 35m viewing tower with spectacular views across the UNESCO World Heritage Site and River Tyne.
0191 278 4217
PIKES AND PLUNDER IN CIVIL WAR NEWARK
O
01636 655765 www.nationalcivilwarcentre.com
ver 300 civil war re-enactors will descend on Newark, Nottinghamshire, during early May Bank Holiday as the clock is turned back to the turbulent mid17th century. The 3rd Annual Pikes and Plunder Civil War Festival will take place on 30 April and 1 May 2017 with over a dozen regiments taking part alongside two artillery companies, a baggage train and scores of living history exponents making the 2017 Festival an even bigger spectacle than before. The historic Queen’s Sconce fort – built in 1644 - will be the stunning venue for musket fire and fighting, whilst Newark Castle hosts major living history displays, recreating the dark days when the besieged citizens of Newark struggled to cope with
food shortages. The National Civil War Centre in the heart of the town will also stage exciting demonstrations to bring the period vividly back to life. Newark is the perfect setting for this event: a Royalist stronghold besieged three times during the Civil War! It is now a picturesque market town, excellently located with the A1, A46 for the M1 and East Coast main line right on its doorstep. The National Civil War Centre is organising this incredible event in partnership with the English Civil War Society to ensure that this will be an unforgettable experience with musketeers, pikemen, cannons and colour across the town. It is certain to be a truly exciting and immersive way for all ages to spend the Bank Holiday weekend.
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
BATTLE FOR THE SKIES AT LEEDS CASTLE IN KENT
S
tep back in time and learn about the role Leeds Castle and the surrounding countryside played during the Second World War at ‘Battle for the Skies’, a new experience opening in May 2017. Experience a dramatic surround-sound display depicting the Battle of Britain taking place in the skies above Kent. Inside the Castle visitors will uncover ‘top secret’ plans that were hatched between Geoffrey Lloyd, the Minister for Petroleum and Prime Minister Winston Churchill and hear stories of how the Castle became both a field hospital and a base for top secret testing of new weapons.
Open every day of the year except Christmas Day, Leeds Castle has so much for visitors to do in 2017 with a packed programme of events and activities for all the family. From formal gardens to falconry, from medieval jousting to children’s trails and much more, all included in the price of the admission ticket which can be used again and again within a year. Special ticketed events bring the best in performing arts, culture and family entertainment to the 12th Century Castle, from open air theatre, opera and classical music to a triathlon and fireworks, there really is something to appeal to all ages and interests at Leeds Castle this year.
di Bo sc ok ou o nt nli ed ne tic fo ke r ts
01622 765400 www.leeds-castle.com
“The Loveliest Castle in the World” Maze & Grotto | Falconry Displays | Playgrounds | Gardens | Punting Exhibitions | Shops | Restaurant | B&B, Holiday Cottages & Glamping Events & Activities | Wildlife | Dog Collar Collection
leeds-castle.com
andrewpickettphoto.com
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
DODDINGTON HALL
CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST. BARNABAS
egun in 1595 by Robert Smythson Doddington Hall, near Lincoln, was completed in 1600 and has never been sold or cleared out since. An example of a fine late Elizabethan Mansion, it is still a lived-in and much loved family home, alive with history and interest. The Estate continues to grow and since 2006 there has been much development including the restoration of the walled Kitchen Garden and the opening of an award-winning Farm Shop. The gardens are full of colour and interest year-round whether it is the spectacular Irises in early June or biennial Sculpture Exhibition (30 July – 11 September).
B
F
www.doddingtonhall.com
offi[emailprotected]
01522 812510
irst opened for public worship in 1844, the Cathedral Church of S. Barnabas was at first designed as a parish church for the growing Catholic population of Nottingham, at the City’s historic West Gate. The church was designed and built along the lines of the fairly-new Gothic Revival movement in architecture by Mr. A.W.N. Pugin, with the generous sponsorship of John Talbot, Lord Shrewsbury. Since the re-erection of the Catholic hierarchy of bishops in England and Wales in 1850, and the subsequent designation of the church as a cathedral, S. Barnabas’ has become central to the life and work of the Catholic diocese of Nottingham.
0115 953 9839
HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION
I
f you don’t already have membership of the Historical Association then it’s time to give it some thought. The association can offer you so much - whether it’s through expanding your history knowledge, bringing you together with people with similar interests, or helping you with research, the HA community is here for you. All you need is a love of history. One of the HA’s strongest assets is its thriving branch network. The HA calls on the support of over 300 volunteers who run its 50 local branches and put together a vibrant and distinctive programme of historical walks, talks and visits across the UK. Members gain access to all these events as part of their membership alongside
annual conferences, tours and national events. The HA also offers a treasure trove of history resources, including thought-provoking articles and pamphlets, as well as a library of over 400 fascinating podcasts from leading historians that can be enjoyed anytime and anywhere. An essential asset of membership is The Historian magazine, delivered to your door four times a year. Each quarterly issue is themed with in-depth articles from experts in their field. Recent editions have honed in on anniversaries including the Battle of Hastings, as well as general topics of interest such as historical journeys and women in history. Membership starts from as little as £37.
0300 100 0223 www.history.org.uk/go/histassoc
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
CO ST U M E S FRO M WOLF HALL AT G A I N S B O R O U G H OLD HALL F RO M R AG S TO R I C H E S
29th April—28th August Telephone: 01522 782040 www.gainsborougholdhall.com
© Company Pictures / Playground Entertainment for BBC2 2015
LINCOLN CATHEDRAL A STUNNING BUILDING, A FASCINATING HISTORY AND A WARM WELCOME ALL YEAR ROUND.
F
ollow in the footsteps of kings and scholars as you explore one of England’s largest Cathedrals. Our guides will keep the whole family enthralled as they bring to life the legends, characters and stories of the Cathedral; stories of battles, power, politics, romance and pilgrimage. Head to the roof tops for spectacular views across Lincolnshire, and if you are lucky you may even spot our resident peregrine falcons! Younger visitors can borrow one of our Explorer backpacks to find fun and imaginative ways to discover Lincoln Cathedral and its treasures – spot the animal
01522 561600 www.lincolncathedral.com
carvings, and our cheeky Lincoln Imp high above the shrine of St Hugh. For those seeking peace and tranquillity we invite you to join one of regular services, or light a candle as you reflect in one of our more intimate chapels. Sample locally sourced food in the Cloisters Café, browse the collection of rare and unusual books in the Medieval and Wren libraries, and discover the perfect souvenir or gift in the Cathedral gift shop to take home as a memento of your day. The Cathedral is full of history, intrigue and exciting treasures – start your journey of discovery today.
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
DURHAM CATHEDRAL
SEACITY MUSEUM
iscover 2,000 years of history at Durham Cathedral, one of the best examples of Romanesque architecture in Europe. Renowned for its spectacular location at the heart of the Durham UNESCO World Heritage Site, Durham Cathedral is the Shrine of St Cuthbert and resting place of the Venerable Bede. The Cathedral boasts the UK’s best-preserved set of medieval monastic buildings, home to Open Treasure, a new world-class visitor experience. Embark on a journey of discovery through the Monks’ Dormitory to the Great Kitchen as the remarkable history of Durham Cathedral and its incredible collections is revealed through permanent and temporary exhibitions.
D
P
www.durhamcathedral.co.uk
www.seacitymuseum.co.uk
0191 386 4266
HOLOCAUST STUDY TOURS FOR SCHOOLS AND PRIVATE GROUPS
O
ffering schools: Two pre-visit seminars including a meeting with a Survivor. British guide for your group throughout the visit. Learning 1000 years of Polish Jewish history and honouring the Jewish resistance and the Righteous Among the Nations. Two-day study tours of Auschwitz and Birkenau. Similar tours also available to Warsaw and Treblinka. Access to workshops in the museum archives and galleries (not available to the general public). Private tours for individuals and small groups from £200 per person including flights.
[emailprotected]
07595 893418
ort Out, Southampton Home, SeaCity Museum’s exhibition for 2017 will tell the story of the great ocean liners that sailed from the city, and will evoke the romance of sea travel and life on board. The exhibition includes a wide range of rarely seen items from the city’s maritime collection, including ship models, posters and photographs, See furniture and other items from famous ships such as Mauretania, Queen Mary and QE2, and learn about the people who travelled and worked on them. Visitors of all ages can have a go at activities such as deck quoits or try on a captain’s or steward’s uniform!
[emailprotected]
MERCHANT ADVENTURERS’ HALL
T
he Merchant Adventurers’ Hall is one of York’s medieval marvels. Set in beautiful gardens in the heart of historical York, it is open for public use as a museum, hospitality venue and meeting place some 660 years after construction began in 1357. This stunning timber framed building is home to many remarkable collections including silver, paintings and furniture which provide a glimpse into the rich history of the Hall and the people associated with it. The Hall also remains the everyday base for the Company of Merchant Adventurers of the City of York. They invite you to discover the secrets of this unique guild hall and its 650 years of history.
www.theyorkcompany.co.uk
[emailprotected]
THE 2017 HERITAGE GUIDE
Advertisement Feature
FIND THE TIME 2 APR - 25 JUN
BAMBURGH CASTLE
ational Trust Trelissick is shedding light on its history, with a sequence of exhibitions in the house. Find the time is the story of Trelissick told through sixteen beautiful craft objects, each inscribed with a piece of its history for visitors to see, handle and play with. The exhibition starts in the 1750s when landowner, John Lawrance, converted the original farmhouse into a villa, and ends in 1955 when former MP, Ida Copeland, gifted the estate to the National Trust. Trelissick families have made and lost fortunes, managed the land, sailed the sea, fought Fascism and championed Cornwall.
N
D
www.nationaltrust.org.uk/trelissick
[emailprotected]
01872 862090
ominating the Northumberland coastline is the King of Castles, Bamburgh, a truly stunning coastal fortress rising from the heart of a designated area of outstanding natural beauty. With a presence here for hundreds of years the castle has witnessed and played its part in a significant number of historical events. Now open to the public throughout the year visitors can explore fourteen state rooms and discover over 3000 items of furniture, porcelain, fine artworks, arms and armour. They can learn about the great industrialist and inventor 1st Lord Armstrong in the Armstrong and Aviation Museum before enjoying stunning views around the grounds and battlements.
01668 214515
DOVER MUSEUM & BRONZE AGE BOAT GALLERY
S
ituated in the town centre and set over three floors, Dover Museum has a range of fascinating real objects, models and original pictures showing the history of Dover. The ground floor exhibition traces Dover’s history from the Stone Age to the Saxons, the first floor has special exhibitions which change annually – the current exhibition is ‘The History of Dover Harbour’ and the top floor gallery shows the growing town and port of Dover since medieval times.
01304 201066 // T: @DoverMuseum www.dovermuseum.co.uk
See the oldest known sea-going boat, the Bronze Age Boat, at Dover Museum. Discovered in 1992, just yards from where it is exhibited, the boat is thought to be some 3000 years old and is now housed in an award winning gallery. Market Square, Dover CT16 1PH
OPENING TIMES March to October: Mon - Sat 09.30 – 17.00 April to September: Mon - Sat 09.30 – 17.00 Sun 10.00 – 15.00
SPRING BOOKS
HISTORY TEACHERS – MAKE YOUR MARK WITH CCEA!
Petrograd, 1917: Witnesses to the Russian Revolution John Pinfold ‘This is invaluable eye-witness history at its very best.’ – Andrew Roberts
Apply to examine and moderate HISTORY with CCEA
9781851244607 HB £25.00
For more information and to apply visit www.ccea.org.uk
Revolution! Sayings of Vladimir Lenin Compilation of some of Lenin’s most famous sayings in a stunning illustrated gift book edition. 9781851244706 PB with flaps £9.99 Publication June
#ExamineWithCCEA Volcanoes: Encounters through the Ages
ccea.info
@ccea_info
David M. Pyle Explores how our understanding of volcanoes has evolved through time, presented through contemporary illustrations and first-hand accounts.
www.plymouth.ac.uk/courses/undergraduate/ba-history [emailprotected] +44 1752 585858 @PlymUniApply
9781851244591 PB with flaps £20.00
@HistoryPlymouth
Oxford Botanic Garden & Arboretum: A Brief History Stephen A. Harris Richly illustrated history of the oldest surviving botanic garden in Britain. 9781851244652 PB with flaps £14.99
Undergraduate History Courses for 2017-18: BA (Hons) History (with minor pathways in English, Politics and International Relations), BA (Hons) Art History
London: Prints & Drawings before 1800
Exciting modules in British, European, US and World History include:
Bernard Nurse
Regimes and Dictators; History and Heritage; Tudors and Stuarts; Early Modern Europe; Pirates and Piracy; Victorians; Twentieth Century Britain; Modern Japan; Colonial India; Ireland from 1914; Civil Rights: US Popular Culture.
Stunning book of prints and drawings of Georgian London with introductory text. 9781851244126 HB £30.00
We also offer Study Abroad opportunities in the US and Europe.
FREE CATALOGUE [emailprotected]
ORDER FROM bodleianshop.co.uk
Open Days: 29 April & 28 June 2017. Book a visit: www.plymouth.ac.uk/study/open-days
Experts discuss and review the latest history releases
BOOKS
Simon Thurley photographed outside St James’s Palace. “The houses were organised to allow the Tudor monarchs to get to their chapels in a magnificent, impressive way. Religion was absolutely at the heart of it all,” he says
Photography by Fran Monks
INTERVIEW / SIMON THURLEY
FRAN MONKS
“No monarch before Henry VIII had owned that quantity of objects” Simon Thurley talks to Matt Elton about his new book, which explores how the five Tudor monarchs used architecture to project their power BBC History Magazine
75
Books / Interview PROFILE SIMON THURLEY Thurley followed senior roles at Historic Royal Palaces and the Museum of London with a 13-year stint as chief executive of English Heritage, where he oversaw its move to become a self-financing charity. His books include Whitehall Palace: The Official Illustrated History (Merrell, 2008) and Men from the Ministry: How Britain Saved Its Heritage (Yale University Press, 2013)
IN CONTEXT
As Simon Thurley shows in his new book, from Henry VII sweeping the Plantagenet architectural legacy aside, to the profligate Henry VIII with his glut of palaces and possessions, and on to the more practically-minded Elizabeth, the Tudors’ architectural projects reflect the personalities of the dynasty. And it’s a legacy that can still be seen, from the fragmentary remains of Richmond and Whitehall to still-standing gems like St James’s Palace and Hampton Court.
Why did you want to write an architectural history of the Tudors? I’ve been interested in royal palaces since the late 1980s and I’ve had incredible opportunities to investigate what remains of them first hand. Combining that with the documentary evidence is a very good way of understanding this period, because residence and governance were intimately linked. Unless you understand the residences, you can’t possibly understand the governance. How much architectural work was required as a result of Henry VII coming to the throne? Initially, it was a matter of scrubbing out the badges and the insignia of his predecessor, Richard III. But later in his reign there were significant changes, because Henry VII was nervous he was going to be pushed off the throne – as his most recent predecessors had been. He discovered plot after plot, including one in which his lord chamberlain was implicated. At that point Henry instituted a fundamental change to the way that his palaces were organised, which allowed him to retreat into a series of very private rooms guarded by fiercely loyal people. You can still see some of these changes. At Windsor Castle, from the terrace you can see the stone-built rooms in which Henry locked himself away from his court. Can we tell how different Henry VIII was from his father through the places in which he lived? Henry VIII inherited a series of buildings that were formed by his very controlling, paranoid father, which weren’t at all suited to the sort of Tudor spoilt brat that this teenage king was. Therefore, he had to either adapt his way of life to fit the buildings, or adapt the buildings to suit his way of life.
76
Luckily, very soon after Henry VIII came to the throne, Westminster Palace – the principal palace of English kings back to Edward the Confessor – was wrecked by fire. This gave him a great opportunity to build new palaces that better suited his way of life, which was all about having quite a lot of fun. He was very keen on hunting, jousting and sport, including tennis, bowls and cockfighting, so he built lots of recreation buildings to accommodate his interests. Why did Henry VIII only develop an interest in architecture later on in his reign? As a young man, all of Henry’s buildings were essentially connected to his recreational pursuits, a trend that lasted for more or less the whole of his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. But the breakdown of that marriage and his relationship with Anne Boleyn brought all sorts of changes in Henry’s life. Among them was the necessity to have a palace in which he could live with his mistress without his wife being there. When you bear in mind there were all these rigid rules, he had to get round them – and the best way to do that was create new buildings. So Henry became interested in architecture for an intensely practical reason – to create a series of love nests, if you like – but out of that grew a genuine interest in building and stylistic issues. How important were possessions to Henry VIII? Henry was a very rich man, and during the dissolution of the monasteries he became even richer. He spent prodigiously, buying tapestries, clothes, paintings, maps, horses and much more. He was very materialistic and obsessed with having objects around him. I compare Henry to a fat dragon sitting astride a mountain of treasure, licking his lips. Nobody needs 60 houses; that’s more
“Luckily, very soon after Henry VIII aft came to the throne, Westminster Palace burnt down”
than one per week! Nobody needs the sheer quantity of tapestries and furnishings that he had, and indeed no monarch before him had owned that quantity of objects. What changed as we move into the reign of Henry’s son, Edward VI? Edward was on the throne very briefly, but the fundamental change was in religion. You can learn a huge amount about the religious views and direction of his court, and those of Mary and Elizabeth, by the architectural changes in the royal chapels. The battle is fought in royal palaces and chapels just as much as in the country’s parish churches. Edward VI immediately painted over a lot of the imagery in the royal chapels, demolished all the stone altars, and replaced them with wooden communion tables. The moment his sister came to the throne the altars were all put back, then when Elizabeth’s reign began they were replaced with the tables again. The chapels are a bellwether for what happened elsewhere in the country. How did the fact that Mary I was a woman impact on the built environment of the court? This was completely unknown territory. When Mary married, it was made very clear that her husband was not the king: she lived in the king’s apartment and he lived in the queen’s apartments. A whole new etiquette had to be devised to make this situation work, and it was very confusing for everyone to begin with. Under Henry and Edward, the men who were permitted access to the private areas of the palace were the men who were involved in running the country. Those men, under Mary, were not allowed in, so where was the nexus? To solve this problem, those places were moved out of the private rooms and into the council chamber. What was Elizabeth I’s architectural contribution? There’s been a view that Elizabeth wasn’t interested in building – indeed, that she didn’tt build anything, and that she sponged off her courtiers and stayed in other people’s houses. And let me be clear: I have written that myself in the past. But I actually no longer think that’s true. When Elizabeth came to the throne there was a terrible glut of royal property. She didn’t need 60 houses
BBC History Magazine
The Great Hall at Hampton Court Palace, with its highly decorated hammer-beam roof, is the only surviving hall built by Henry VIII. It was the perfect place to show off some of his many possessions and the walls are hung with sumptuous tapestries
ALAMY
any more than her father did, and she couldn’t afford to maintain that many properties. So she came to realise that she was very unlikely to be a very great builder, because there wasn’t a need. That didn’t mean that she wasn’t interested in architecture or building, though, and there are a few things that I think people – including myself – haven’t spotted before which demonstrate very clearly that she was deeply interested in architecture. For instance, she let people know when she made a change to a building: every single thing she ever did architecturally features her initials. Henry VIII never did that. What led you to change your mind? A pretty forensic analysis of the documents. The building accounts have been looked through by quite a lot of historians, but what’s never really been examined are her wardrobe accounts. People have looked at them because they were interested in what she wore, but nobody has analysed them in terms of what they tell us about how she spent money on the interiors of her palaces. Two things came out strongly: firstly, that she was interested in good housekeeping. She would cut up clothes that had belonged to her dead brother, Edward, and use them to reupholster stools. Such frugality was a feminine virtue that was very much admired among the Tudors. The second thing that comes through from these records is her taste. We know what kind curtains she liked to have, for example – striped, with heavy
BBC History Magazine
fringing and gold and silver braids. We also know that she loved huge floor cushions and much preferred to lie on a bank of cushions than sit on a chair. Her ladies would loll around on cushions, and visiting ambassadors would be invited to lie down next to the queen. Another thing that’s never been spotted before is that Elizabeth was mad about fountains, and commissioned ever more elaborate examples. She had a wicked sense of humour, too, and loved fountains that had secret dials you could use to squirt people. That’s not the Elizabeth we’re used to! Life in the Tudor court was increasingly governed by a set of rules and regulations. How is this evidenced through the buildings? As the Tudor period went on, the rules at court got more carefully defined and more rigorously enforced. By Elizabeth I’s reign, people were living in a highly regulated environment, in which everybody knew what was going to happen when. This was a change from what went before, because Elizabeth wasn’t relying on physical strength to tell people what to do. She had to rely on a much more subtle matrix of elements to maintain her authority – of which etiquette was one of the most important. What we learn about these buildings through the records is that, under Henry VII, there were a very small number of very tightly controlled rooms into which he retreated. By the time you get to the
“Elizabeth loved floor cushions. Visiting ambassadors would be invited to lie down next to the queen” accession of James I and VI, about a quarter of large palaces such as Whitehall or Hampton Court were private zones reserved more or less only for ladies. Elizabeth was living in a very different sort of building from her grandfather, Henry VII. What new impression of the Tudors would you like to leave readers with? The biggest thing I’d like people to take away is the way in which religion dominated. It’s easy to think that, after Henry VIII’s break from Rome, religion was over, but the courts of the Tudors were 100 per cent organised around religious observance and display. The houses themselves were organised to allow the monarchs to get to their chapels in a magnificent, impressive way. Religion was absolutely at the heart of it all. Houses of Power: The Places that Shaped the Tudor World by Simon Thurley (Bantam, 496 pages, £30)
77
The beginning of common currency? This is one of the earliest coins in the world, dating to the 6th century BC. From the middle of the 7th century BC onwards, ancient Mediterranean cities and states such as Lydia had begun to issue pieces of electrum – a mixture of gold and silver – that were a consistent weight and purity. The idea caught on and we still carry coins around today.
Supported by
Explore the history of money Visit the free Citi Money Gallery britishmuseum.org/money
Explore find your thing
Enjoy a walking holiday in the UK or abroad with three nights’ full board from £240 per person HF Holidays have been creating walking and activity holidays for people of all abilities and ages since 1913. We take care of the accommodation, the food and the routes, while you discover the joys of the great outdoors, the culture, the history and the wildlife: push yourself to achieve tougher challenges or take it at your own pace.
quote
0345 470 7558 EPA8
hfholidays.co.uk/50
£50 OFF Book by 31 May 2017
YOUR FIRST BOOKING*
7 &VGLVFRXQWLVSHUERRNLQJDQGDSSOLHVWRÀUVWWLPHERRNHUVZLWK+)+ROLGD\VRQO\ERRNHGE\0D\1RQ member associate fee £10pp. Premium room supplements may apply. Visit our website for full Terms & Conditions
New history titles, rated by experts in their field
REVIEWS
Lloyd George and Churchill are two of the key protagonists in Peter Clarke’s new book
Prime mover of history NIGEL JONES enjoys the quirky observations in this book
MAGAZINE
CHOICE
on the effect of the world wars, but finds it lacks coherence The Locomotive of War: Money, Empire, Power and Guilt by Peter Clarke
GETTY IMAGES
Bloomsbury, 432 pages, £25
Professor Peter Clarke’s intention, he tells us, is to examine the impact of the two world wars – the First World War in particular – on liberal western democracy, through the prism of five major players: Lloyd George and Churchill, Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D Roosevelt, who led their countries through the wars,
BBC History Magazine
and the economist John Maynard Keynes. The problem is that his declared theme too often gets lost in the detail. Nonetheless, the book is a richly rewarding feast of facts and arguments. The “locomotive of war” – the term is attributed to Trotsky – took the societies that fought to an unintended destination. Britain entered the 20th century complacently resting on the laurels of its empire with, as Clarke says, “Canada as its granary and Australia as its abattoir”. But, forced to build a fleet of expensive Dreadnought warships by the rising threat of Germany, the money to carry out the Liberal government’s ambitious social reforms drained away.
Two of Clarke’s protagonists, Lloyd George and Churchill, were deeply involved in the run-up to war as cabinet colleagues, rivals and mutually admiring friends. The men who became the successful dictatorial war leaders of Britain were very similar, despite their wildly different backgrounds: Lloyd George, the wily Welsh-speaking, small-town solicitor who clawed his way to the top; Winston, the aristocrat born in a palace. What they had in common, besides their silver tongues and pens, was a ruthlessly driving ambition, the ability to get things done, and an unwavering devotion to, and belief in, themselves. Though nominally Liberals in the prewar Asquith government, neither gave a fig for ideology or party politics. To make these two egomaniac individualists, as Clarke would like to do, representative figures of liberalism doesn’t really work. Gladstonian liberalism and arguments about tariffs and free trade were swept away in 1914 in the roar of war, and the two men dived in with all the enthusiasm of natural born warriors. In a chapter rather unfairly titled ‘How the Liberals Started a World War’, Clarke pithily recounts how opinion in the government swung from a determination that Britain should stay out of a European quarrel, to the decision to go to war within a couple of days. The decisive factor was the unprovoked German invasion of Belgium, which persuaded Lloyd George to follow Churchill in backing belligerence. Clarke’s most readable pages are his potted biographies of his five heroes. We learn of the crucial role played by Wilson’s Presbyterian background, and the stern moralism reflected in his doomed attempt to make the postwar
Britain entered the 20th century complacently resting on the laurels of its empire
79
Books / Reviews CO OMING SOON… Next issue, we’ll have reviews of the latest history books on “N su ubjects as varied as the Six-Day War, a view of Britain through itss census, and the real story of the American West.” Matt Elton, reviews editor
The chapters devoted to Keynes fit awkwardly into the book, which exposes its central flaw theme in a continuous narrative. As Clarke admits in his Acknowledgements, the book lacks coherence. He would perhaps have done better to present it as a collection of essays, a form at which he excels. Despite this caveat, as one would expect from such a distinguished veteran historian, the book is well worth reading, not least for such original observations as Clarke’s view that Lloyd George’s and FDR’s private marital infidelity gave energy to their public lives. He closes on a typically paradoxical note. After spending pages comparing Britain’s many unjust colonial small wars with Germany’s two devastating world wars, he ends with a dark warning that today’s Germany, loser in both world wars but the victor in peace, is currently inflicting economic misery on the continent after ironically gaining “the sort of mastery of Europe that they had twice failed to achieve by military means”. Nigel Jones is the author of Peace and War: Britain in 1914 (Head of Zeus, 2014)
80
The birth of Christianity PETER JONES considers a comprehensive explanation of
the roots of one of the world’s main religions The Dawn of Christianity: People and Gods in a Time of Miracles and Magic by Robert Knapp Profile Books, 320 pages, £25
Robert Knapp offers a detailed account of how a small Judaic cult developed into Christianity, to be eventually embraced by the emperor Constantine in AD 312. He begins by taking the two apparently competing traditions of the relevant religious divide in the ancient world – monotheistic Judaism and pagan polytheism – and shows how they shared many concerns and interests. Both, for example, were aware of powerful, unpredictable, supernatural forces at work, which needed a response by prayer and ritual. The main difference between the two was Yahweh and the covenant he established with the Jews, guaranteeing them his favour – if they kept to the path of true worship, just social dealings and personal righteousness. If different groups advocated different emphases, Yahweh still remained the sole focus. Paganism, by contrast, offered a potpourri of religious experience, from ancient gods to my mystery t y cults. lt A Anyy new god who pu ut on an impressive show w of power was alwayys worth a try. The only rule was: do o not threaten the social order. While Jesus’s origins as a charismatic
Jesus’s claim to be the son of God was anathema to Jews; his followers formed a tiny Judaic cult
miracle-worker and his emphasis on personal rather than cultic righteousness were standard fare, his claim to be not a representative, but the son of Yahweh was anathema to Jews. His miraculous resurrection, however, justified his followers’ belief that he was the Jews’ anointed Messiah promising a new world order; and this threat to Rome’s supremacy, among much else, put this tiny Judaic cult at loggerheads with pagans too. The Roman destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 confirmed that Jesus’s second coming in that city, already delayed, would never be realised. The cult began to abandon its increasingly fruitless dialogue with mainstream Judaism and focused its attention on pagans. This major shift laid the foundations for Constantine’s ‘conversion’. But there was nothing inevitable about this. If less than 10 per cent of the empire was even nominally Christian, paganism was the default position. So if the emperor, who wisely did not proscribe other gods, wanted the Christian god in the imperial mix, it was all the same to pagans. What the emperor wanted, he got. The Christian church, however, had the organisation in place to take full advantage. Knapp’s book does not contain a lot that is new but provides a very clear and readable, if slightly repetitive, synthesis of important i t t work o on early Christianity. Yet it leaves one hungry fo or more: he has laid th he foundations for arguably the real story of Christianityy, which b begins with Constantine. C Peter Jones is the P au uthor of Quid Prro Quo: What the Rom mans Really Gave the E English Language (Atlanttic, 2016)
BBC History Magazine
AKG-IMAGES
world a Princetonian peaceful, pious and principled place, just like him. In glaring contrast, the amorality of President Roosevelt is starkly portrayed in his cynical view of Josephus Daniels, his boss at the US Navy Department at the outbreak of the First World War: “Mr Daniels feeling chiefly very sad that his faith in human nature and civilisation and similar idealistic nonsense was receiving such a rude shock.” The cuckoo in the nest among the quartet of politicians is Keynes, who seems to be here mainly because Clarke has written several previous books about him. The chapters devoted to him fit awkwardly into the rest of the book, which exposes its central flaw: the failure to sustain its central
A portrait of a woman, once thought to be Catherine Howard. Henry VIII suspected her of adultery and beheaded her within a year and a half of their marriage
Lady in waiting SARAH GRISTWOOD is captivated by this beautifully written
and engaging biography of Henry VIII’s fifth wife Young and Damned and Fair: The Life and Tragedy of Catherine Howard at the Court of Henry VIII by Gareth Russell William Collins, 512 pages, £25
Gareth Russell opens his biography by quoting from the poet Stevie Smith, and comparing Henry VIII’s fifth queen to Scott Fitzgerald’s Daisy Buchanan. If you’re going to take those sorts of risks, you need some serious historical heft behind you. This Russell has, and in abundance. To the vivid phrasing of a novelist, he adds a forensic eye for fact and an encyclopaedic knowledge of the personalities of the late Henrician court.
BBC History Magazine
The date of Catherine Howard’s birth is debatable, like that of her kinswoman and predecessor Anne Boleyn, but she would have been still in her teens when, in 1539, she came to court as one of the attendants appointed to King Henry’s fourth wife, Anne of Cleves. Henry’s horrified rejection of Anne left a job vacancy, but Russell skewers the theory that Catherine was cunningly promoted to Henry’s bed and board by a calculating composite entity called ‘the Howard family’. It was chance that saw Catherine catch the eye of a king three decades older than her. They
Russell shows how closely, in court, sex was allied to death
married on 28 July 1540 but Catherine’s queenship was brief and necessarily ineffectual, though Russell makes a gallant attempt to show her as at least trying to fit the heavy mantle around her notably slight frame. What brought her down was sex, and Russell shows how closely – in the febrile court of a king who “had gone rotten without ever being ripe” – sex was allied to death. When, in November 1541, Catherine was first questioned by Archbishop Cranmer, it was about a premarital affair. In her grandmother’s lax household Catherine had a degree of physical intimacy with the music tutor Henry Manox and went much further with one Francis Dereham who, as she incoherently confessed, had lain with her “diverse times… sometimes in his doublet and hose, and two or three times naked”. Within a fortnight, stories yet more damning began to emerge, of a passionate and ongoing relationship with her husband’s gentleman servant Thomas Culpepper. While the court was on progress, Catherine and the handsome Culpepper had snatched hours of intimacy (in the privacy of the latrines!). And though Russell maintains that they had not as yet technically become lovers, the intention was enough to damn them – at least in Henry’s world. Catherine, not yet 21, was beheaded at the Tower of London on 13 February 1542. Russell quotes Catherine’s burning letter to Culpepper: “It makes my heart die to think what fortune I have that I cannot be always in your company.” But there still is little other real evidence as to the character of Henry’s fifth wife, “mediocre in everything except her appearance and her charm”, and this is a problem for his, as for every other, version of her story. Neither was she a player in the political game. It remains a moot point whether a biography can ever be larger than its subject, but Russell is a formidable new talent from whom big things can be expected, surely. Sarah Gristwood is the author off Game of Queens: The Women Who Made SixteenthCentury Europe (Oneworld, 2016)
81
Books / Reviews
London in the early 17th century. Stephen Alford successfully evokes the city, as seen through the eyes of its residents
A time of dynamism TRACY BORMAN welcomes a fascinating uncovering of the
unsung Tudor heroes who transformed the nation’s capital
Allen Lane, 336 pages, £20
We are a nation obsessed with the Tudors. Our fascination with this notorious royal dynasty is understandable. It was a dramatic and colourful age, with a king who married six times, a Virgin Queen, seismic events such as the Reformation… and so the list goes on. And yet, as Stephen Alford argues, the real triumph of the Tudor age was the evolution of London from medieval backwater to dynamic global metropolis. It is an unusual angle on an extensively studied period, but one that is far from niche. Indeed, the themes that the author uncovers hold such relevance and interest that it leaves the reader wondering why on Earth nobody thought to write this book before. Alford draws upon some of the research that made his earlier book,
The Watchers, such a success. An expert in the Tudor ‘underworld’, he brings to life a range of ordinary people from various walks of life – merchants and sailors, criminals and visionaries – who changed the nation’s capital forever. London’s Triumph conjures up a vivid picture of the city, even though most of the buildings and places described were destroyed in the Great Fire of 1666. Drawing on contemporary books, maps and pictures, as well as a wealth of archaeology, Alford makes Tudor London seem tantalisingly close. But the real focus of his book is the people. It was their response to the rapidly changing world around them that helped transform the capital into a stridently self-confident symbol of the nation. In the dazzling cast of characters, the likes of Ralegh, Drake and even
He brings to life a cast of characters who changed the nation’s capital forever
Female fantasies JOANNA BOURKE reviews an investigation into the status and
sexuality of women as indicated by their romantic icons Heartthrobs: A History of Women and Desire by Carol Dyhouse Oxford University Press, 288 pages, £20
Romantic fiction is opium for the (female) masses. Whether it is a Mills and Boon paperback, a historical epic like Gone With the Wind, or, in my case, Erica Jong’s Fear of Flying
82
(which I really did think was about airplanes), romances are irresistible. Like Jong’s “zipless fuck”, they allow women to turn their lustful gaze towards men, without guilt or responsibility. They encourage us to daydream. As Carol Dyhouse proposes here, icons of desirability tell us a great deal about the role and status of women, as well as about their sexuality. These icons of masculinity are born within the female imagination. While some feminists and many self-designated ‘intellectuals’ sneer
Elizabeth I herself are relegated to mere extras. Instead, the story is told through the eyes of men such as Thomas Wyndout, a successful and respected merchant who died in 1500, and Sir Thomas Smythe, King James VI and I’s ambassador to the tsar of Russia in 1604. The century that divided these two men witnessed unprecedented change in the capital. One of the most striking developments was the growth in population from 50,000 to 200,000, all the more surprising given the demographic crises of mortality and disease that dominated the Tudor period. An even more dramatic shift was in attitude. Painfully aware that their city lagged behind the rest of Europe in trade
at ‘shop-girl romances’ and worry that they encourage ‘rape fantasies’, Dyhouse insists that we take literary and filmic representations of sexy men seriously. Romances are expressions of women as “desiring subjects”. She has no time for John Berger’s infamous claim in Ways of Seeing: “Men look at women. Women watch themselves being looked at.” Rather, she encourages her male as well as female readers to “look at men through the eyes of women”. Such an approach reveals the shifting focus of female desire, from Rudolph Valentino’s delicate-skinned Sheik in the 1921 film version of an Edith Maud Hull novel, to hunky superhero Fabio Lanzoni in the 1980s. Dyhouse also shows that social, economic, technological and political
BBC History Magazine
BRIDGEMAN
London’s Triumph: Merchant Adventurers and the Tudor City by Stephen Alford
WANT MORE ? For interviews with authors of the latest books, check out our weekly podcast at historyextra.com/podcasts
The growing divide IAN MORRIS is impressed – and depressed – by a powerful
global history of inequality and its pessimistic conclusions The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the 21st Century by Walter Scheidel Princeton University Press, 528 pages, £28
and exploration, London’s merchants and adventurers displayed extraordinary confidence and resilience as they set out to redress the balance, and were rewarded with huge success. By the end of the period, English ships could be found all over the globe, trading with Russia and the Levant, exploring the Arctic and Virginia, and laying the foundations for an empire upon which the sun never set. London had triumphed, but so had the unsung heroes of the Tudor age. Move over, Henry VIII. Tracy Borman’s books include The Private Lives of the Tudors: Uncovering the Secrets of Britain’s Greatest Dynastyy (Hodder, 2016)
ALAMY
changes have a profound impact on the forms of masculinity considered to be desirable. In the 1920s and 1930s, for example, the ‘cave man’ reached its peak, amid debates about the power of the primitive. This type of man was virile and aggressive in public, but protective and capable of gently cradling his female lover in private. Not surprisingly, ‘real’ men generally fail to live up to the ideal. Compromises have to be made: it is called ‘growing up’. But, thankfully, there will always be writers like Barbara Cartland and EL James to create worlds of female desire for disappointed lovers. Joanna Bourkee is professor of history at Birkbeck College, London
BBC History Magazine
Churchill once said that while “the inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings, the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries”. In his remarkable new book, The Great Leveler, r historian Walter Scheidel shows that this is even truer than Churchill realised. In fact, says Scheidel, reducing inequality has alwayss been a miserable business. In this magisterial review he demonstrates that economic inequality normally expands as far as it can without driving (too many) of the poorest into starvation. The hunter-gatherer bands of early prehistory were very equal, but only because they produced too little surplus to make anyone rich; but as soon as farming began, the rich began getting richer. It was rare for this trend to be reversed, but whenever it was, it involved mass violence or plague. And even then, war, revolution and disease only worked when h th they gott really, ll really ll b bad. d
The clearest cases come from the 20th century, when the world wars saw steep taxes to fund armies of millions, while labour shortages drove up wages and fighting destroyed accumulated wealth. Between 1914 and 1945, inequality fell to levels not seen since the age of huntergatherers, and only in the 1970s did the effects start wearing off. Between 1917 and the 1980s, communist revolutionaries used violence to reduce inequality even more. The 20th century was an almost-unique age of equality. Before 1900, violence only really levelled inequality when it got so out of hand that entire societies collapsed, such as the Roman empire in the fifth century. Otherwise, the only reliable leveller was disease. The Black Death killed one-third of the people in Europe, the Middle East and China in the 1340s–50s, leaving so few workers that wages soared while land values, rents and markets collapsed, impoverishing the rich. But as population recovered, the effects again faded. The western world is more economically unequal today than at any time since the 1910s. The depressing thing, Scheidel concludes, is that “in the absence of violent shocks, increases in inequality are unlikely to be reversed”. Yet there is another way to see this nasty story: as the rich got rich richer, so too, often, did the poor. In 1913, orrdinary workers were much richer thaan nearly everyone who had lived befo ore them. The real problem is not that in nequality is rising again, but that, for m many, prosperity has stopped rising. A As Churchill said, our real choice is between the unequal sharin ng of blessings and the equal sharin ng of miseries. Ian M Morris is the author of Why the Westt Rules – For Now (Profile, 2010)
The dance of death, 14th century. The Black Death is one example of Scheidel’s ‘levellers’ of inequality
83
Books / Paperbacks
PAPERBACKS The Private Lives of the Tudors: Uncovering the Secrets of Britain’s Greatest Dynasty by Tracy Borman
AKG-IMAGES
Hodder, 464 pages, £9.99
‘Behind closed doors’, ‘upstairs, downstairs’ history has become popular recently, with numerous books promising i i revelatory, ‘secret’ histories and more intimate tellings of familiar narratives. Tracy Borman’s book similarly promises new revelations and unearthed secrets. As joint chief curator of Historic Royal Palaces, Borman is certainly a well-placed guide, and the Tudors are particularly suited for such ‘private’ history. y Issues of sex, chastity, infid delity and fertility, and the probllem of the succession, continually bedevilled the dynasty: forr instance, whether or not th he marriage of Catherine of Aragon and her first husbaand, Prince Arthur, had been fu ully consummated was at the heart of Henry VIII’s ‘Greaat Matter’ – his desire to divorce her and marry Anne Boleyn. In every sense the political was profoundly personal. While Borman surveys much that is familiar in her potted biographies of the five Tudor monarchs, what is most interesting and perhaps less wellknown is the detail that she provides throughout. This ranges from court rittuals and etiquette, and her focu us on food and medicine, to a discussion of material cu ulture and the importance of clotthing and furnishing at court. Drawing all of this material
BBC History Magazine
together is valuable, particularly in the context of the reign of Henry VII, which is still relatively neglected in general accounts of the Tudors. The book is perhaps more disappointing in its coverage of Mary I. As the first crowned queen regnant of England, Mary oversaw significant changes in the practice and presentation of monarchy. Her reign also saw the royal body tested and scrutinised in unprecedented fashion when she as monarch not only had to provide for the succession but literally deliver the heir. Yet here all of that is discussed in little more than 20 pages – and, as is so often the case, Elizabeth I is instead the main focus for discussion of the feminisation of politics and political intimacy.
Among the most regularly asked questions by history enthusiasts is about the gritty reality of life at court: where did the monarch go to the toilet? How often did they bathe? What medicines were available if they were ill? Borman attempts to provide answers in this part political narrative, part time-traveller’s handbook. While new discoveries and insights may, in the end, be somewhat lacking, this book will undoubtedly prove fascinating to non-specialist readers hoping to learn more about the Tudor period. Anna Whitelock is reader in history at Royal Holloway, University of London and author of Elizabeth’s Bedfellows: An Intimate History of the Queen’s Court (Bloomsbury, 2013)
An engraving of Mary I, c1883. Tracy Borman’s book explores court life across the Tudor period
The Doctor’s Wife is Dead by Andrew Tierney Penguin, 272 pages, £14.99
First-time author Andrew Tierney is a distant descendant of Ellen Langley, who died in Nenagh, County Tipperary, Count Tipper in 1849 following a long period of deliberate neglect and abuse from her husband, Charles Langley, a local doctor. The Langleys were Protestants, minor members of the local elite, and in turn related to the bigger players in the town and county – yet despite this, Ellen was as emaciated as the impoverished victims of the twin scourges of famine and cholera ravaging g the district. While metticulously researched (m mostly from newspaper reeports), Langley’s account of th he case is a triumph of storytellin ng, since no amount o of scholarship can cover alll the information gaps aand loose ends that real--life scandals gen nerate. Relying on tw wo big courtroom seet-pieces, he deftly plays out chapterp eending cliffhangeers and plot ttwists to create a shocking account of Victorian o double standards, d co omplete with a cconvincing villain. It will w hold you all the way tto the climax and on to aan astonishing final twiist. Eugene Byrnee is a journalist and author of b books including Isambard Kinggdom Brunel: Pocket Giants (Historry Press, 2013)
85
Books / Fiction THREE MORE TALES OF GEORGIAN RADICALS Fair Exchange Michèle Roberts (1999)
FICTION Revolution and ruin NICK RENNISON on a novel of English political idealism and
marital deceit during a time of revolutionary unrest Birdcage Walk by Helen Dunmore Hutchinson, 416 pages, £18.99
Lizzie Fawkes, the narrator of Helen Dunmore’s fine novel (her 15th), is a spirited young woman, living in Bristol in the 1790s. Her mother Julia is a pioneering feminist thinker and writer, not entirely unlike Mary Wollstonecraft. Her stepfather is Augustus Gleeson, a political pamphleteer. She has grown up in a household committed to the need for a radical transformation of society, and events in France, where the revolution is under way, seem to offer magnificent hopes for the future. Even as news of terrible bloodshed in Paris reaches the West Country, Augustus and his friends cling to the belief that a new and better world is in the making. As the novel opens, Lizzie has just married John Diner Tredevant, a very different man to the ones she has known in her mother’s and Augustus’s radical circle. A speculative builder planning a
86
grand terrace of houses, to him the revolution in France and the prospect of war represent only threats to Bristol’s housing boom. The attraction between Lizzie and her new husband remains strong but, as his business faces disaster and questions arise about the fate of his first wife, who supposedly died on a trip back to her native France, she begins to wonder if she has ever truly known him. Lizzie is further undermined by the loss of her much-loved mother, who dies in childbirth. Lizzie takes responsibility for her newborn half-brother, but dark clouds are gathering on the horizon. In all her fiction, Dunmore shows an acute awareness of the interactions between the lives of ordinary individuals and the larger forces of history. Birdcage Walkk shows its characters reacting to the revolutionary ideas of the time. It also presents a memorable portrait of a young woman confronting with courage the unforeseen consequences of her choices and some terrible truths about the man she has married. Nick Rennison is the author of Carver’s Truth (Corvus, 2016)
Burning Bright Tracy Chevalier (2007) I 1792, the Kellaways In arrive in Lon n from a rrural Dorset and find a city nervously eyeing c unfolding events in u rrevolutionary France. Jem, the youngest J boy, forms an unlikely b alliance with streetwise Cockney girl Maggie and the two find an unexpected mentor in the Kellaways’ new neighbour – the radical poet, artist and printer William Blake. Tracy Chevalier creates a colourful picture of late Georgian London and of two children’s passage from innocence to experience on its streets.
The Devil is White William Palmer (2013) A Anti-slavery abolittionists and radicals attempt to establish a a utopian, multiracial community on an c island off the west coast of Africa. c Although the first A settlers all long for a new society untouched by the evils of the old, their hopes disintegrate under the impact of disease, death and the emergence of bitter divisions within their ranks. William Palmer creates a moving story of thwarted idealism.
BBC History Magazine
ALAMY
Clifton’s Birdcage Walk, Bristol. The city, gripped by news of revolution in France, is the backdrop for Helen Dunmore’s tale of radicalism and romance
R Roberts’s rich, sensuous novel opens with o a peasant woman in early 19th-century e France asking her F vvillage priest for absollution from the most momentous sin of her m life and lif d opens out into a story of sexual passions both acknowledged and unacknowledged. Drawing on real incidents in the lives of William Wordsworth and Mary Wollstonecraft, but including characters of Roberts’s own creation, this is a cleverly constructed romance seen from a feminist perspective.
Fa Fantastic im imagery: H Hieronymus B Bosch’s The Ga arden of Ear E rthly Delights
Radical notions Surrealism: The Art of Dreams & Desire TV BBC Four, scheduled for April
Thanks to surrealism, lobster telephones and melting clocks have insinuated their way into the wider culture. But, according to psychotherapist Philippa Perry, many of the radical ideas that inspired these images have become rather lost along the way. As part of a short season on surrealism, Perry explores how the political upheavals of the 1920s inspired new ways of understanding the human psyche. She also sets up a bureau of surrealist research in Paris and discusses the proto-surrealism of Hieronymus Bosch with film-maker Peter Greenaway.
Participating in sport boosted troops’ morale in the First World War
This sporting life
Jonathan Wright previews the pick of upcoming programmes
TV&RADIO
New world dreams Misha Glenny tells us about his new series charting some of the defining ideas that shape US culture and history The Invention of America RADIO Radio 4, scheduled for Sunday 9 April
The way a nation sees itself, in the estimation of award-winning journalist Misha Glenny, grows in great part from “historical myths, truths and halftruths”. In the case of the USA, its superpower status means its “self-perception” is often of pressing concern to the wider global community. This is especially the case in 2017, as the world considers the Trump administration’s promises to break with recent history. It’s therefore an opportune moment for Glenny to look Stateside, uncovering – in a three-part series – fascinating 19th-century stories that are perhaps not familiar to British listeners. Each show deals with key themes, such as borders. In the 1840s, Texas was incorporated as a US state following the Mexican-American War. “As a consequence of the defeat of Mexico, the Americans not only get Texas, but theyy gget New Mexico and California as well,” says Glenny. This appeared to many to confirm the notion of thee US
having a so-called manifest destiny MAGAZINE CHOICE to create a country that ran from the Atlantic to the Pacific. But this was an idea with inherent contradictions because Mexicans, Native Americans and Afro-Americans were excluded from this vision. “Manifest destiny sounds like a god-given programme,” says Glenny, “but it was a god-given programme that benefited primarily European whites.” The series explores some of these contradictions. The declaration of independence promises the rights to “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, yet accessing these rights can be tough for newcomers, as Irish Catholic immigrants to New York and Boston in the 19th century discovered. The final episode in the series deals with power. In the 19th century, says Glenny, the American system was strong enough to take down “the robber barons, an oligarchic class” through anti-trust legislation with the help of “constitutional provisions laid down at the end of the 18th century”. y He’s not so sure the constitution is equal to today’s unequal society.
Games on the Battlefield TV Yesterday, scheduled for
GETTY/UKTV/TOPFOTO
Sunday 16 April
If the story of how, in 1914, British and German soldiers called a temporary truce and played football on Christmas Day is familiar, the wider story of sport during the First World War is far less well known. As this documentary explores, this was a time when the military authorities saw organised sport as a way to keep up morale. For the troops themselves, many from rural areas, this was often the first time they had been able to play football, to box or to take part in competitive athletics. Drawing on rarely seen footage, this one-off documentary explores the Great War’s key role in the history of sport.
BBC History Magazine
Conquering army: US troops seize Mexico City during the Mexican-American War, 1847
Manifest destiny was “a programme that benefited primarily European whites”
87
TV & Radio ALSO LOOK OUT FOR…
George Blagden and Anna Brewster star as Louis XIV and Madame de Montespan in a series that promises more “plotting and rumpy-pumpy”
Power and intrigue TV BBC Two, scheduled for April
It’s back. After a first season of plotting and rumpy-pumpy, all of which culminated in a traitor being revealed and Louis XIV brutally consolidating his hold on power, the second series of the drama set in 17th-century France has much to live up to. This time around, the story, set four years after the first series, is centred on l’affaire des poisons, when a number of prominent figures in French society were accused of poisoning and witchcraft. Eventually, the scandal reached the king’s inner circle and there were
Lost masterpiece German Concentration Camps Factual Survey – Special Archival Edition DVD (BFI, £29.99, cert 18) On 29 September 1945, a rough cut of a film was screened at the Ministry of Information in London. Assembled by Sidney Bernstein, who later founded Granada Television and led a team that included Stewart McAllister, Richard Crossman and Alfred Hitchcock, it showed the horrors of the Nazi death camps. The aim of the film was to create a visual report that would shame the German people into accepting Allied occupation. But with
trials that resulted in executions. Precisely how the creative team behind Versailless approached the subject was still rather shrouded in mystery as BBC History Magazinee went to press. Nevertheless, we can expect familiar faces to return, notably George Blagden as Louis and Alexander Vlahos as the outrageous Philippe I, Duke of Orléans. Lest the events on screen should seem too outlandish to be based on reality, we can expect too the return of writer Greg Jenner and Kate Williams, professor of history at the University of Reading, as presenters of Inside Versailles, the show that finds the duo offering historical context on the series. the conflict over, the documentary was ultimately left unfinished. Now, Imperial War Museums (IWM) has restored the six reels that are said to have caused an awed hush from those who saw them. Moreover, IWM has completed the film, including adding a newly recorded narration by actor Jasper Britton. Seven decades on, the new version is being described as “definitive”. The BFI’s DVD and Blu-Ray also features an 80-page booklet offering new writing about the film, and a variety of extras, including interviews with then newly liberated prisoners from Dachau, and a panel discussion recorded at the BFI Southbank and featuring restoration director Dr Toby Haggith of IWM.
Blackadder is set to go forth once more in April
On Yesterday, there’s an excuse, if any were needed, to rewatch Blackadder. In the nightly ‘The History of Blackadder’ strand (Monday 10 April), the channel is showing all four series along with documentaries from shows such as Time Team, David Starkey’s Monarchy and Tracy Borman’s Private Lives of the Tudors to offer context. Another highlight on Yesterday is a channel premiere for The Underground War (Wednesday 12 April), which follows the hunt for one of the last Allied dug-outs, deep beneath the cornfields of Flanders, Belgium. On PBS America, American Experience: Walt Disney (Tuesday 11 April) is a portrait of the animator and filmmaker. Shown over four successive nights, the series promises “unprecedented access” to Disney’s archives, including footage featuring in a documentary for the first time. Mighty Uke (PBS America, Friday 7 April) charts the history of a musical instrument that was brought to Hawaii by Portuguese immigrants and gained huge popularity in the US before coming to be seen as the preserve of eccentrics. Forthcoming episodes of In Our Time (Radio 4, from Thursday 20 April) include a show devoted to Roger Bacon, the 13th-century philosopher, academic and Franciscan friar also known as Dr Mirabilis. Finally, the new BBC One adaptation of Evelyn Waugh’s comic masterpiece Decline and Fall continues in April. Jack Whitehall heads a starry cast that also includes Eva Longoria and David Suchet.
A restored film of the Nazi death camps is being described as “definitive”
88
BBC History Magazine
TIBO/IWM/UKTV
Versailles
NEW FROM THE MAKERS OF BBC HISTORY MAGAZINE
INSIDE THE THIRD ISSUE...
Expert voices and fresh takes on our global past – and how it shapes our lives in the 21st century
China’s battle to shape its international image
The real story of life in America’s ‘wild west’
ISSUE 3 Inside the Cold War scramble to control Africa
ONLY £6.99 INC FREE P&P* NEW
* FREE UK postage for subscribers to BBC History Magazine
ORDER ONLINE
www.buysubscriptions.com/worldhistories3 or call us on 0844 844 0250+ and quote WORLHA173 * Subscribers to BBC History Magazine receive FREE UK POSTAGE on this special edition. Prices including postage are: £8.49 for UK residents, £9.49 for Europe and £9.99 for Rest of World. All orders subject to availability. Please allow up to 21 days for delivery. + Calls will cost 7p per minute plus your telephone company’s access charge. Lines are open 8am–8pm weekdays & 9am–1pm Saturday
OUT&ABOUT HISTORY EXPLORER
British PoW camps Richard Smyth and Professor Bob Moore visit Eden Camp in North Yorkshire, where captured German and Italian soldiers were held prisoner during the Second World War
90
EDEN CAMP MUSEUM
I
t’s not much to look at: a cluster of east Africa as the allies gained ground in 34 tin-roofed one-storey huts, Egypt, Eritrea, Abyssinia and Italian hunkered down on the agricultural Somaliland. Initially, the vast majority of captured Germans were shipped out flatlands of Ryedale, halfway between York and the coast. The flags surdirectly to Canada; many Italians, too, mounting a redbrick tower in the were dispatched to Britain’s former middle of the complex snap in the wind dominions, to India or South Africa. But beneath a blustery blue sky. those who were taken to Eden and the other Eden Camp is an award-winning museum British camps weren’t here to see out the of the Second World War – ‘the people’s rest of the war behind barbed wire; they were here to work.” war’, as the museum calls it. There are exhibits here covering everything from The war had created a crippling labour Bomber Command and the U-boat menace shortage on the home front. Britain’s farms to George Formby and ‘Dig For Victory’. were crying out for more manpower, and the Vintage military hardware and signposts in strong young men of the Italian army more army stencil crowd the footpaths. But the than fitted the bill. The PoW camps, initially camp is more than just a museum: as an designed as internment pens, quickly original, surviving prisoner of war camp it’s evolved into central hubs from which a piece of history in its own right. prisoners could be dispersed across the PoWs first arrived at Eden Camp in 1942. countryside to wherever they were needed. They were Italians, captured in action; their Romance and teacakes first task was to finish the construction of “Camps had to be sited away from military their new home. When they had finished, the camp would have looked much as it does bases and the coast,” explains Moore. “East Anglia, for instance, was initially considered now (minus the gift shop and adventure an unsuitable location, despite its high playground). demand for agricultural labour, “Eden was one of 487 PoW because it had too many air camps hastily thrown up bases and too clear a view across Britain to house of the North Sea. The more than 400,000 first camps were incoming prisoners concentrated in during the Second inland north World War,” says Bob England, the West Moore, professor of Midlands and Wales.” 20th-century Surprisingly, European history at though, prisoners’ the University of German PoW Konrad Rausch, who was held in rural neighbours didn’t Sheffield. “At first, Eden Camp for two always respond to them these were almost all years after the war as ‘the enemy’. “The Italians, seized in north-
Eden Camp Museum – viewed here through poppies and barbed wire – holds a comprehensive collection of PoW artefacts
BBC History Magazine
Prisoners sent to Eden Camp weren’t here to see out the war behind barbed wire; they were here to work
BBC History Magazine
91
German PoWs at Eden Camp, c1946-48. Prisoners at the camp were self-sufficient, with their own bakery, cook house, laundry, infirmary, theatre and chapel
stereotype of the Italian soldier was one that came straight from Churchill,” says Moore. “Unlike the Germans, who were viewed as inherently militaristic, Italian soldiers were believed to bear the British little ill-will; there was in fact some sympathy for the way in which the country had fallen under the yoke of Mussolini and his Fascists. What’s more, they were, from a 1940s provincial standpoint, hugely exotic. Instinctive aversion – there was a war on, after all – was leavened by curiosity and even compassion.” Some Britons even tried to actively help PoWs. Mabel Blagborough of Oldham earned the nickname ‘angel of Glen Mill’ for a campaign of support that included throwing cigarettes and teacakes over the camp’s barbed wire fence. But while the view from the home front was mostly accommodating, the presence of Italian PoWs in England prompted a less than tolerant response on the front line. Photographs of Italians at work in the fields alongside British land girls triggered outrage among many serving British soldiers, who were aghast to see their sisters, wives and sweethearts working cheek-by-jowl with the enemy. Romantic liaisons between PoWs and British women did happen. Some of these had happy endings: a number of former
PoWs returned to Britain after the war to renew romances and even propose marriage. Others had more unexpected outcomes. Moore recalls one woman who, after her mother’s death, examined her own birth certificate and found to her surprise that her father had been an Italian PoW.
Nazi daffodils ff Hut 10 houses Eden Camp’s impressive collections of PoW memorabilia, including a map of Britain littered with black dots, each marking a PoW camp. Moore points out a few locations of note: Grizedale Hall in Cumbria, which from 1939 housed senior German PoWs and was dubbed the ‘U-boat Hotel’ because of its large proportion of submarine officers; Lamb Holm on Orkney, where prisoners working on the sea defences constructed the wonderfully ornate Italian Chapel, which stands there to this day; and the aforementioned Glen Mill in Oldham, where an SS private was shot dead by a guard in February 1945. As the war progressed and the threat of invasion receded, the number of German prisoners on British soil was allowed to increase, including at Eden Camp, which housed Germans from 1944–49. D-Day and its aftermath saw the numbers skyrocket: by March 1945, 70,000 German PoWs were at
work in Britain; in September 1946, with the dust finally settling on the conflict, the figure peaked at 402,200. “The numbers, when considered as a whole, are mind-boggling,” says Moore. “A world war is in many ways a mass migration. PoWs – whether shipped out via the Cape to the Canadian prairie, or bundled back to Britain in returning D-Day troopships – were a considerable component in the Second World War global transit networks of men, materiel and resources.” Eden Camp originally comprised 45 huts, 18 of which served as housing (64 men per building), with the remaining huts serving as workshops, kitchens, mess and recreation halls, and even a hospital. Conditions, although basic, were generally acceptable. “Both sides of the war knew that breaches of the Geneva Convention might be met with retaliation, so prisoners were treated pretty fairly”, says Moore. “For Germany, the question was more acute in respect of its increasingly brutal war with the Soviet Union: Germany’s war of annihilation on the eastern front led to the deaths of 2 million Soviet PoWs in 1941–42, which would have made the Germans aware of what could happen if the tide of war turned.” In Britain, although prisoners were put to work, they weren’t especially overworked. Six days a week, working nine to five, was usual, in line with a normal working week for a British labourer.
“PHOTOGRAPHS OF ITALIAN PoWS AT WORK ALONGSIDE BRITISH LAND GIRLS TRIGGERED OUTRAGE AMONG SERVING BRITISH SOLDIERS” 92
BBC History Magazine
EDEN CAMP MUSEUM
Out & about / History Explorer
VISIT
EDEN CAMP MUSEUM
Eden Camp Hut 10 showcases an array of handicrafts and memorabilia whittled, sculpted, painted and polished by inmates in their free time. Other diversions included lectures, theatre and sport – Bert Trautmann, a paratrooper, found his way from internment at Camp 50 near Wigan to footballing glory with Manchester City. But it wasn’t all fun and games. British authorities deemed it important to ‘re-educate’ – that is, de-Nazify – German captives, prior to their repatriation. “At one level, this involved the deployment of intelligence officers to weed out the most fervent or influential Nazis,” says Moore. “At another, it saw an increase in the fraternisation permitted between PoWs and local people – a ‘hearts and minds’ campaign designed to build bridges between Britain and the new Germany that was to take shape in the postwar years.” Not all German PoWs were ready to give up their extremist political beliefs, though. A woman whose family had taken in a German prisoner to work in the gardens of their home on the south coast told her local newspaper that he seemed a very nice young man – at least until the spring after his relocation, when the daffodils sprouted and the flowers were seen to spell out the words ‘HEIL HITLER’. “In fact,” says Moore, “the authorities identified a clear generational divide among the Germans: the older PoWs, who could
A garden at Eden Camp. Inmates were used to bolster the Dig for Victory campaign by growing fruit and vegetables
BBC History Magazine
PoW CAMPS: FIVE MORE PLACES TO EXPLORE 1 The Italian Chapel LAMB HOLM, ORKNEY
Where Italian prisoners worshipped In 1943, former Italian PoWs at work on allied sea defences on Orkney were given permission to build a Catholic chapel on Lamb Holm. Created from two Nissen huts joined end to end, it is now one of Orkney’s most-visited attractions. visitscotland.com
2 Cultybraggan Camp Malton, North Yorkshire YO17 6RT edencamp.co.uk
NR COMRIE, PERTHSHIRE
Where top Germans were held
remember a Germany before Nazism, tended to be more amenable to re-education. But those who had never known anything other than Hitler’s Reich and the non-stop indoctrination of Joseph Goebbels’ propaganda machine were often beyond reach.”
Britain’s last remaining high-security PoW camp. Notoriously tough, and once home to SS officers, members of the Wehrmacht, Luftwaffe and Marine Corps, it was dubbed the “Black Camp of the North”. Hitler’s deputy Rudolf Hess is said to have stayed here after crash-landing in Scotland in 1941. visitscotland.com
From camp to chicken shed
3 The Hayes Conference Centre
Today the bustling canteen does a roaring trade in burgers and cappuccinos, a far cry from the rations doled out to PoWs. A typical prisoner would have made do with bread, margarine and tea for breakfast, pork and potatoes for dinner, and a supper of milk, soup and bread. Over a cup of tea Moore tells me how modern historians treat the history of our PoW camps. It seems that it’s sometimes overlooked in popular narratives of the war. “Social historians don’t like it because it’s about people in uniforms,” he comments, “and military historians don’t like it because it’s about losers. Another problem is that few camps remain intact in any form. Most passed back into private ownership after the war, and either reverted to whatever they’d been before or were put to new commercial uses (as chicken sheds, in one instance).” Eden Camp did time as an agricultural holiday camp, and was earmarked as the site of a potato-crisp factory, before the owner was persuaded to turn it into a museum. Today the mossed brick and corrugated iron huts of Eden Camp tell a story of their own – and it’s one we aren’t told often enough. Bob Moore is professor of 20th-century European history at the University of Sheffield. Words: Richard Smyth
SWANWICK, DERBYSHIRE
Where a great escape took place In December 1940, five German PoWs crawled to freedom through a 30-metre escape tunnel dug behind a fireplace at the Hayes (a Christian conference Centre that was requisitioned as a camp). Their story was later made into the film The One that Got Away. y cct.org.uk/about-us/latest-news/ post/128-a-historical-look-at-the-hayes
4 Island Farm BRIDGEND, SOUTH WALES
Where a PoW breakout was foiled Designed to hold 2,000 PoWs, Island Farm was later redesignated as a PoW camp for German officers. In March 1945, 70 prisoners attempted a daring escape using a secret tunnel – all were recaptured but some made it as far as Birmingham. The site can be visited by appointment. hut9.org.uk
5 Colditz Castle SAXONY, GERMANY
Where allied prisoners were held Home to allied PoWs during the Second World War, Colditz Castle exhibits include escape equipment fashioned by British, French, Belgian, Dutch and Polish prisoners in their attempts to break out of the supposedly escapeproof site. schloss-colditz.com/ information/Information.html
93
Out & about
FIVE THINGS TO DO IN APRIL New beginnings RE-OPENING / FREE ENTRY
National Army Museum Chelsea, London From 30 March 020 7730 0717 nam.ac.uk
MAGAZINE
CHOICE
T
NATIONAL ARMY MUSEUM/GERED MANKOWITZ/FITZWILLIAM MUSEUM, CAMBRIDGE
he National Army Museum has thrown open its doors to the public once more following a three-year £23.75m redevelopment project. Four floors now house five permanent thematic galleries, which explore the near 400-year history of the British Army. Visitors begin their journey in the Soldier gallery, which draws on individual stories and objects from the museum’s collections to explore the physical and emotional experience of soldiering throughout the army’s history. The Army gallery explores the history of the force as an institution, while the Battle gallery examines the British experience of conflict from the 1640s to the present day. The two final spaces – Society and Insight – examine the army as a cultural as well as a military force and the impact it has had around the world. More than 2,500 objects will be on show in these exhibitions, including a large number of new acquisitions. Meanwhile, a 500 sq metre temporary exhibition space will launch with a display of around 150 paintings and objects that explore the relationship between art and soldiers – as well as considering the themes of mapping, propaganda and war art. The reimagined museum also boasts a new study centre, a three-room learning centre and play space for children aged up to seven years old.
CLOCKWISE FROM TOP LEFT: An officer’s helmet from the Royal Regiment of Horse Guards, worn at Waterloo; a wounded guardsman in the Crimean War by Elizabeth Thompson; medals awarded to Lt Col Herbert Jones; Jimi Hendrix, 1967
EXHIBITION / FREE ENTRY
EXHIBITION / FREE ENTRY
EXHIBITION
EXHIBITION / FREE ENTRY
Madonnas and Miracles
International Ireland
Captain Bligh: Myth, Man, Mutiny
Hadrian’s Cavalry
Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge Until 4 June 01223 332900 fitzmuseum.cam.ac.uk
A wealth of objects, including ceramics, books, sculptures paintings and jewellery, shed light on the often hidden world of religious devotion in the Italian Renaissance home.
Ulster Museum, Belfast Until 17 September 0845 608 0000 nmni.com/um
Drawing on works of art from the Ulster Museum collection, the exhibition explores how Irish artists have been directly influenced by international art and Modernism between 1890 and 2016. Among the artists featured are Sean Scully, William Leech and Roderic O’Connor.
Virgin and Child with St John the Baptist by Pinturicchio, c1490–95
National Maritime Museum Cornwall, Falmouth Until 7 January 2018 01326 313388 nmmc.co.uk
This exhibition marks the 200th anniversary of the death of Lieutenant William Bligh, commander of the Bounty during the famous mutiny in April 1789, which saw Bligh and his men sail 3,600 nautical miles in a 23ft launch after being cast adrift from the ship. Objects on show include relics from the voyage, such as the bullet-weight used for measuring the meagre rations.
Various locations 8 April–10 September hadrianswallcountry.co.uk/ hadrians-cavalry-2017
Ten sites across 150 miles of the Hadrian’s Wall World Heritage site – from Senhouse Roman Museum in Maryport, Cumbria to Arbeia Roman Fort and Museum in South Shields – will host an exhibition celebrating the cavalry regiments that once guarded this north-west frontier of the Roman empire. Visitors can enjoy re-enactment events through the summer as well as see artefacts such as Roman armour and weapons.
95
Out & about
MY FAVOURITE PLACE
Verona, Italy by Paul Edmondson For the latest in our historical holiday series, Paul explores the romance of Verona, a veritable Mecca for lovers across the world around you. When I think of the city, I recall the moment I was jogging through it early one summer morning. There was some mist, and I was exploring Verona for the first time. I happened to run through the Piazza Dei Signori, and there was Dante’s statue peering down at me. I felt as if I was being glanced at by an entire culture. Crowds always gather at the Casa di Giulietta, a combination of several 12th-century houses that may have belonged to the Capuleti (Capulet) family of Romeo and Juliett fame. The legend is good enough to make it one of the most symbolic places in Europe. Here you can pay homage to – and perhaps even enact – the idea of the famous love story. The balcony (part of a former sarcophagus) was added to the wall overlooking the courtyard in the 1930s. A bronze statue of Juliet was placed below it in the
1970s. According to legend, if you touch her right breast, you will be happy in love. The graffiti in the passageway that leads into the courtyard is more West Side Storyy than Renaissance. As you stand there looking over it, hundreds of relationships clamour for your attention. When Charles Dickens visited Juliet’s house in 1844 he describes “a grimvisaged dog, viciously panting in a doorway, who would certainly have had Romeo by the leg, the moment he put it over the wall”. Nevertheless, the Victorian author fell in love with the city, visiting Juliet’s tomb, a red marble sarcophagus inside the monastery of San Francesco al Corso, said to be the final resting place of Shakespeare’s tragic heroine. A 20-minute walk from the house, the tomb reminded Dickens of a water trough, though he too was swept away, and found his place in the story.
The statue of Juliet, sited beneath her famous balcony, is said to bring luck in love
A mere five minutes’ walk from Juliet’s house is the glorious Piazza Bra, dominated by its first-century arena, an enduring reminder of Verona’s Roman past. The arena was built to hold 30,000 people (many more than actually lived in the city), which is indicative of the city’s long-established importance as a centre of commerce and tourism. When Shakespeare’s contemporary, Thomas Coryat, visited Verona, he said he had not seen so many “notable antiquities and memorable monuments” in Italy (except in Rome). He admired the egg-
Verona’s Roman arena continues to host public entertainments such as opera and theatre
96
BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES
I
t was my late father who first mentioned Verona to me, while we were on a family holiday at nearby Lake Garda. “It’s famous for its opera,” he said, “and for Romeo and Juliet.” I was 11, and already those two lovers had a mythical reality entirely of their own. But we never made the trip. In fact, I did not visit Verona until 23 years later, just after my father had died. By then I had taught and seen Romeo and Juliet many times, and I’d even played Valentine in Shakespeare’s other Veronese play, The Two Gentlemen of Verona. The Italian city has now become a delightful place for me to visit and even to work. ‘Fair Verona’, as it’s referred to in the opening lines of Romeo and Juliet, t makes real for me an imagined Shakespearian location. The claims of the city’s Roman, medieval, and Renaissance influences are all
ADVICE FOR TRAVELLERS
BEST TIME TO GO Verona is at its hottest during July and August with average highs of 24°C. The Shakespeare and jazz festivals run from June into August, while the main opera season at the arena runs from late July to early September. The city is quieter in winter and spring.
GETTING THERE Many of the UK’s airports offer direct flights to Verona. If you arrive at the railway station it is easy to find a bus to Piazza Bra.
WHAT TO PACK Your copy of Romeo and Juliett (you might like to read an act at a time in five different places around the city). Comfortable footwear because it’s a great city for exploring on foot, especially around the castle, and walking across the bridges.
At Casa di Giulietta you can pay homage to – and perhaps even enact – the idea of the famous love story shaped arena, which reminded him of the tiltyard at Whitehall where Veronese and Venetian gentlemen often jousted. Opera (often Verdi) started to be staged at the arena from 1913. I saw Sir Franco Zeffirelli’s production of Carmen there last summer, which began at 9pm and went on for four and a half hours. There were at least 250 people on stage (as well as four
Been there… Have you been to Verona? Do you have a top tip for readers? Contact us via Twitter or Facebook
horses and three donkeys), and about 15,000 in the audience. This was tragic love sung to the summer night, with all the excitement of a Roman circus. I love walking through the Piazza Erbe towards the Dominican church of St Anastasia, the largest in the city, flanked with frescos, including Pisanello’s famous St George and the Princess. Take the lift to the top of the great campanile or walk along the banks of the Adige river and over the Ponte Pietra (originally the city’s oldest, but reconstructed after the Second World War). From there you can see part of the
Roman amphitheatre (dating from 25 BC). No visit to Verona is complete without taking a walk around the lovely Giusti Gardens, planted during Shakespeare’s lifetime. They lead to one of the finest views of the city – like a collection of sonnets opening out in front of you.
WHAT TO BRING BACK Locally produced cheese, wine, olive oil. Gnocchi is the region’s traditional pasta, and you might enjoy the pandoro, Verona’s Christmas cake.
READERS’ VIEWS I found the little graffiti tunnel leading to Juliet’s balcony fascinating. So many lovers in one place @raghavmodi The whole of Verona is beautiful, but I am a fan of the romance of Juliet’s balcony! @bookworm_mouse
Paul Edmondson is head of research for the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust Read more of Paul’s experiences at historyextra.com/Verona
Next month: Kathryn Warner explores Seville, Spain
twitter.com/historyextra facebook.com/historyextra
97
Advertisement Feature
Spring Heritage Collection
2.
4.
5.
7.
8.
3.
copyright © 2016 Richard Danter Photography
Photo Credit: National Trust / John Phot Jo Hamm ammond nd
1.
6.
9.
2. MAIDENHEAD HERITAGE CENTRE
3. EREWASH MUSEUM
300 years of the history of our Regiments in an extraordinary castle like building. Highlights include a reconstructed WW1 trench and four Victoria Crosses. keepmilitarymuseum.org | 01305 264066
A fabulous Spitfire simulator helps tell the story of Air Transport Auxiliary and its intrepid male and female pilots who ferried warplanes from factories to RAF airfields throughout the war. maidenheadheritage.org.uk | 01628 780555
Erewash Museum, Derbyshire Museum of The Year 2011, 2012 and 2016. Visit our fascinating local history museum and art gallery. Explore our gardens or try afternoon tea in our brand new tea room. erewashmuseum.co.uk | 01159 071141
4. MUSEUM OF WITCHCRAFT & MAGIC
5. STANSTED PARK FOUNDATION
6. THE MUNNINGS ART MUSEUM
Contains the world’s oldest and largest collection relating to witchcraft. magic and the occult in the world. Located in the historic harbour of Boscastle on the North Cornwall coast since 1960. museumofwitchcraftandmagic.co.uk | 01840 250111
Step back in time and immerse yourself in the elegant mansion rooms, fascinating servants’ quarters and sweeping parklands of the former home of the Bessborough family where history comes alive. stanstedpark.co.uk | 023 9241 2265
In 2017 The Munnings Art Museum reveals another side to one of Britain’s finest equestrian painters, Sir Alfred Munnings, with the launch of a surprising new exhibition: Munnings and the River. munningsmuseum.org.uk | 01206 322127
7. FROGMORE MILL, HEMEL HEMPSTEAD
8. CALKE ABBEY
9. BUTSER ANCIENT FARM
Learn about the history of paper, make your own sheet, see a working 1902 paper machine and much more at the world’s oldest mechanised paper mill - birthplace of paper’s industrial revolution. thepapertrail.org.uk | 01442 234600
Many secrets are yet to be uncovered in Calke Abbey’s seemingly abandoned rooms. Discover hidden stories, collections and spaces revealed for the first time, before exploring forgotten views of the estate. nationaltrust.org.uk/calke-abbey | 01332 863822
A unique experimental archaeological site in the beautiful South Downs. Step inside ancient buildings from the Stone Age, Iron Age, Romans and Saxons, plus prehistoric crops and rare breeds of pigs, goats and sheep. butserancientfarm.co.uk | 02392 598838
1. THE KEEP MILITARY MUSEUM, DORCHESTER
THE DIRECTORY
for more online visit www.historyextra.com/directory VISITS
PUBLISHERS
TOURS
!"# $% &
History isn’t all black and white...
' (
TO ADVERTISE ON
HISTORYEXTRA.COM ...come and find out about the Romans’ colourful past at Fishbourne Roman Palace! CONTACT GEORGE BENT ON 0117 300 8542 OR [emailprotected]
PO19 3QR 01243 785859
www.sussexpast.co.uk PUBLISHERS
Why Not Be A Proofreader? As a freelance proofreader and copy editor you can earn a good income making sure that copy is professional and error free. Earning your share can be fun, varied and profitable. Our Proofreading and Copy Editing Course will show you how to set yourself up as a freelancer – either full or part-time – putting you in control of your working life! You’ll receive: •
A first-class, home-study course created by professionals
•
Expert, personal tuition from your tutor
•
Advice on all types of proofreading and copy editing techniques
•
Plus much more!
If you want to be a proofreader and copy editor, this is the way to start! It’s ideal for beginners. No previous experience or special education required. 15 day trial. For free details visit our website or call us today!
What Students Say... %&#$"%&$% %&%&# & &#$#% &&!%&% $%"%&& !# &! $!!$&! &&!"#&%%&%&# &!&% &!"%
& %$##&%&$##$%! &! #& &#$"%&!"&&$" "%&#!$"&%"!" & $%%! %&% &" %""& !!"&%&$!%&#&%&$%$" $%!&#$&"#$ &&$"&"% #&%&" &#$
Reasons To Enrol Specialist course on proofreading and copy editing. Caring constructive help from expert tutors. Four tutor-marked assignments. Help and advice from our experienced Student Advisory Team. Flexible study programme. Specialist advice on how to find work. Enrol when it suits you. Instant access to course material when you enrol online. 15 days trial. Online Student Community Area. Advice on how to set yourself up in business. !$%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
www.wbproofreading.com
!##$%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
FREE CALL 24 HRS
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% #$! %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Quote Ref: 1B417P
Start TODAY When You Enrol ONLINE! START YOUR COURSE TODAY by visiting our website. Your course modules and the first assignment are available online so you can start studying while you wait for your course books to arrive.
! $%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
""$##
0800 856 2008
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
The Writers Bureau "$ ""$ $!
Writers Bureau
28
Years of Success
www.facebook.com/thewritersbureau Members of BILD www.twitter.com/writersbureau and ABCC email: [emailprotected] Please include your name and address
5 issues for £5
*
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE WITH OUR RANGE OF TITLES Subscription offe r... ›› Trial your first 5 issues
for just £5* ›› Continue to save after your trial period en ds ›› Free UK delivery direct to your door ›› Never miss an issue an d save on the shop price
BBC Focus Magazine
BBC History Magazine
History Revealed Magazine
BBC Sky at Night Magazine
BBC Wildlife Magazine
Exploring the most incredible advances in science and technology delivered in a clear and entertaining way.
Britain’s best-selling history magazine, helping you bring Britain’s and the world’s rich past to life.
History Revealed retells history’s greatest stories in a fresh, pictorially-rich and exciting fashion.
The hands-on guide to astronomy – for those who want to discover more about the wonders of the Universe.
UK’s favourite natural history magazine, filled with fascinating stories of animals and amazing wildlife photography.
SAVE 35%
SAVE 30%
SAVE 26%
SAVE 25%
SAVE 30%
Pay just £17.55 every 6 issues by Direct Debit
Pay just £20.95 every 6 issues by Direct Debit
Pay just £19.99 every 6 issues by Direct Debit
Pay just £23.40 every 6 issues by Direct Debit
Pay just £16.75 every 6 issues by Direct Debit
SUBSCRIBING ONLINE IS QUICK & EASY Go to www.buysubscriptions.com/KNOWLEDGE16 or call us now on 01795 414 746 and quote KNOWLEDGE16 *5 issues for £5 offer available to UK Direct Debit orders only. After this your subscription will continue at the price specified above every 6 issues by Direct Debit. If you cancel within 2 weeks of receiving your 4th issue, you will pay no more than £5. Your subscription will start with the next available issue. OFFER ENDS 31ST OCTOBER 2017.
MISCELLANY
Q&A
QUIZ BY JULIAN HUMPHRYS Try your hand at this month’s history quiz
ONLINE QUIZZES historyextra.com /quiz
1. What links Frenchmen Jean Nicot (pictured below, died 1600), Pierre Magnol (d1715) and the Marquis de Sade (d1814)? 1
2. Where in London would you find buried a copy of Bradshaw’s Guide, a portrait of Queen Victoria, a box of cigars and the 1878 Whitaker’s Almanack?
3. It was called The Original and was launched at South Shields in 1789. What was it? 4. Which of the following English court painters was born in Britain? a) Hans Holbein b) Anthony van Dyck c) Peter Lely d) Godfrey Kneller
ILLUSTRATION BY GLEN MCBETH
5. How did the mysterious Ferguson’s Gang hit the headlines in Britain in the 1930s and 40s?
Q I’ve heard that the fashion at the
6. What did Jane Taylor write after looking out of the window of this house in Lavenham?
court of Elizabeth I was to speak with a Cockney accent. Is this true?
6
Richard Hingston, County Down
If this was the case, it wouldn’t be the same Cockney accent as we’d recognise now; that didn’t really emerge until the 1700s and linguistic purists only associate it with east London. The famous Cockney rhyming slang (apples and pears, and so on) was not recorded until the mid-1800s and is almost certainly a descendant of the semi-secret languages – ‘cant’ – of the London underworld and street markets. At Elizabeth’s court you would have heard London accents among servants, officials and tradesmen, but it wouldn’t have been encouraged among aristocratic courtiers. By Elizabeth’s time there was a strong movement towards a distinctively English language marked by plainness and clarity, which seems to have been encouraged by the queen. The first
A
ALAMY
QUIZ ANSWERS 1. They are all eponymous, lending their names to nicotine, magnolia and sadism respectively. 2. Underneath Cleopatra’s Needle where they are some of the objects in a time capsule that was buried under the monument when it was erected on London’s Embankment in 1878. 3. The world’s first purpose-built lifeboat. 4. None of them: Holbein was born in Augsburg, van Dyck in Antwerp, Lely in Soest, Kneller in Lubeck. 5. By making large anonymous donations to the National Trust. 6. ‘Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star.’
GOT A QUESTION? Write to BBC History Magazine, Tower House, Fairfax Street, Bristol BS1 3BN. Email: [emailprotected] or submit via our website: historyextra.com
BBC History Magazine
known use of the term ‘Queen’s English’ dates from the 1590s. Elizabeth nicknamed Ralegh ‘Water’, mocking his West Country accent, and obviously there were regional accents at court. But the upper classes, as touchy as ever about status, were starting to distinguish themselves from the rabble by talking ‘proper’. As for their accent, there is plenty of debate, but it certainly wasn’t the received pronunciation of Elizabeth II. The best evidence we have is that in London it would have sounded a bit West Country, a bit Midlands, a bit Irish, and – some say – a lot like the accent you can still hear in more isolated parts of the Appalachian regions of the US. Eugene Byrne is an author and historian
101
Miscellany
SAMANTHA’S RECIPE CORNER Every issue, picture editor Samantha Nott brings you a recipe from the past. This month it’s a hearty offal dish enjoyed by the Victorians
Devilled kidneys
INGREDIENTS 4 very fresh pig’s kidneys 1 tbsp lard or olive oil Small glass of cider brandy 1½ tbsp cider vinegar Healthy shake of Worcestershire sauce Pinch of cayenne pepper
1 tbsp English or Dijon mustard 1 heaped tsp redcurrant, crab apple or other fruit jelly 2–3 tbsp double cream Sea salt and freshly ground black pepper Chopped flat-leaf parsley METHOD Slice the kidneys into quarters and trim out the white core. Put a frying pan on a high heat and, when hot, add the oil followed by the kidneys. Allow kidneys to brown before turning. After about 90 seconds add the brandy. Let it bubble and reduce, then add cider vinegar, Worcestershire sauce, cayenne pepper, mustard and fruit jelly and stir. Add the cream and allow sauce to bubble and reduce. Taste and adjust seasoning as required. Serve with fried bread or on toast, scattered with the chopped parsley. VERDICT “Delicious at any time of the day!” Difficulty: 2/10 Time: 20 minutes Based on a recipe from rivercottage.net
Japanese planes prepare for take-off in December 1941, headed for Pearl Harbor
Q What were the circumstances and rationale behind Japan’s decision to attack Pearl Harbor and join the Second World War? Owen Neal, London
The answer depends on how you define ‘Second World War’. In my view, it is Eurocentric to date the war from 1939; marginalising China prevents true understanding of the development of the global conflict. Japan ‘joined’ the Second World War when it began fighting China in July 1937 (why that happened is a different question). Bringing a successful end to a stalemated war in China was one of the reasons why, in the summer of 1941, Tokyo escalated its war effort. If the question is why Japan attacked Britain and the US in December 1941, then another major factor was a desire to widen its empire’s resource base. A unique ‘window of opportunity’ had opened: two European states with resourcerich Asian possessions (France
A
and the Netherlands) were occupied by Germany, and two more (Britain and Russia) were desperately embattled. Tokyo had little interest in the possessions of the US, but it was concerned about the risk that American forces posed to its shipping routes from planned conquests in south-east Asia. The assault on south-east Asia began a few hours before Pearl Harbor. Striking the American naval base before declaring war allowed the weaker Japanese navy to use the element of surprise to neutralise the American fleet and, hopefully, deal a crushing blow to American morale. Evan Mawdsley’s books include December 1941: Twelve Days that Began a World War (Yale University Press, 2011)
Deliciously devilish kidneys
102
BBC History Magazine
BRIDGEMAN
Devilled kidneys, traditionally a Victorian breakfast dish, have made quite a comeback in recent years. Devilling food began in the 18th century and refers to the dish’s sauce, usually made with spices or condiments. I love the idea of kidneys for breakfast but I’ve always been a bit squeamish about cutting up offal. I’m glad I gave it a whirl though; it’s delicious! The kidneys were beautifully tender and the rich, boozy, spicy sauce was perfect for mopping up with some bread. This recipe was from River Cottage and worked very well. I think the beauty of this dish though is you could experiment quite easily and add a little more or less of what you fancy. If you want to avoid the unappetising smell of urine while cooking, make sure your kidneys are veryy fresh!
PRIZE CROSSWORD
Who was the mother of George I? (see 17 down)
Book worth
Across 5 John, the Puritan preacher, famous for his Christian allegory, written in 1678 and not out of print since (6) 7 Georg von der ___, a Prussian general of the First World War (anagram of ‘wiz tram’) (7) 10 Parisian fortress dating back to medieval times, which became a symbol of despotic Bourbon rule (8) 11 Location, in Cheshire, where the body of a male, dating back possibly to the first century AD, was found in a bog in 1984 (6) 12 Charlemagne’s tomb is to be found in this spa town, believed to be his birthplace (6) 14 Humanitarian agency set up in 1863 and given multinational recognition by the Geneva Convention of 1864 (3,5) 15 Destination of the first march by Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament protestors at Easter 1958 (11) 19 French gold coin called a ‘Napoleon’ after the Revolution, and worth 20 francs (5,3) 21 In feudal society, a person holding a fief from a lord in return for military service (6) 22___ of Miletus, sixth-century BC philosopher, one of the Seven Wise Men of Greece (6) 23 Georgius, 16th-century German scholar and scientist, the ‘father of mineralogy’ (8) 25 The South African surgeon who, in 1967, performed the world’s first successful human heart transplant (7) 26 Playwright, the first ‘Angry Young Man’, whose 1956 play transformed the British theatre (7)
BRIDGEMAN
Down 1 First name of the British ironmaster renowned for his pioneering ironsmelting process (7) 2 He was a king of England (1016), Denmark and Norway (4)
BBC History Magazine
CROSSWORD S PRIZE ZE E
£18.99 for 5 winners
A Little History y of British Gardening by Jenny Uglow From how the Tudors made their knot gardens to whether the Romans used rakes, Uglow takes readers on a historical tour of Britain’s gardens. Starting with the thorn hedges of prehistoric settlements and ending with today’s ‘outdoor rooms’, the book also highlights gardens open to the public. Published by Chatto & Windus, in hardback, £18.99
3 Term for a traditional narrative folk song, often applied to a modern sentimental pop number (6) 4 Widespread action by agricultural workers against the hated new threshing machines, starting in east Kent in 1830 (5,5) 6 South American president who, following a coup in 1973, shot himself to avoid capture (7) 8 A major philosophy of classical China, requiring adherents to follow ‘the way’ (6) 9 17th-century Welsh buccaneer who became deputy governor of Jamaica (5,6) 13 Linked by a causeway to the Northumbrian mainland, it is the location of a monastery founded by St Aidan (4,6) 16 Roman emperor Septimus ___, who died, after an illness, at what is now York (7) 17 Electress of Hanover, mother of George I of Great Britain (6) 18 ___ Street, ancient route that by Roman times linked Dover and Wroxeter (7)
20 Byname of a Second World War German general and national hero, the ___ Fox (6) 24 The mid-20th-century US civil rights movement ended the so-called Jim ___ laws (4) Compiled by Eddie James
HOW TO ENTER Open to residents of the UK, (inc. Channel Islands). Post entries to BBC History Magazine, April 2017 Crossword, PO Box 501, Leicester LE94 0AA A or email them to [emailprotected] by 5pm on 26 April 2017. Entrants must supply full name, address and phone number. The winners will be the first correct entries drawn at random after the closing time. Winners’ names will appear in the June 2017 issue. By entering, participants agree to be bound by the terms and conditions shown in full in the box below. Immediate Media Company (publishers of BBC History Magazine)) will use personal details in accordance with the Immediate Privacy Policy at immediatemedia.co.uk/ privacy-policy/privacy/ Immediate Media Company Limited (publishers of BBC History Magazinee) would love to send you newsletters, together with special offers, and other promotions. If you would not like to receive these, please write ‘NO INFO’ on your entry. Branded BBC titles are licensed from or published jointly with BBC Worldwide (the commercial arm of the BBC). Please tick here if you’d like to receive regular newsletters, special offers and promotions from BBC Worldwide by email. Your information will be handled in accordance with the BBC Worldwide privacy policy: bbcworldwide.com/privacy
SOLUTION TO OUR FEBRUARY CROSSWORD Across: 1 Howe 3 Agincourt 8 Ethiopia 10 Bretby 11 Hess 13 Swansea 15 Jackson 17 Lincoln 19 Crusade 22 Edinburgh 24 Li Po 26/27 Bayeux Tapestry 28 Lanfranc 29 Laon. Down: 1 Hythe 2 Whitsun 4 Granby 5 Nobel 6 Obelisk 7 Robin Hood 9 Purcell 14 Whitehall 16 Airship 18 Crimean 20 Silesia 21 Ireton 23/12 Boxer Rebellion 25 Peron. FIVE WINNERS OF SEA CHARTS OF THE BRITISH ISLES S Kent, Herefordshire; E Turner, London; D Cutler, Dorset; T Carroll, Nottinghamshire; C Lucas, Buckinghamshire CROSSWORD COMPETITION TERMS & CONDITIONS The crossword competition is open to all residents of the UK (inc. Channel Islands), aged 18 or over, except Immediate Media Company Bristol Limited employees or contractors, and anyone connected with the competition or their direct family members. By entering participants agree to be bound by these terms and conditions and that their name and county may be released if they win. Only one entry permitted per person. The closing date and time is as shown under How to Enter, above. Entries received after that will not be considered. Entries cannot be returned. Entrants must supply full name, address and daytime phone number. Immediate Media Company (publishers of BBC History Magazine) e will not publish your personal details or provide them to anyone without permission. Read more about the Immediate Privacy Policy at immediatemedia.co.uk/privacy-policy/ The winning entrants will be the first correct entries drawn at random after the closing time. The prize and number of winners will be as shown on the Crossword page. There is no cash alternative and the prize will not be transferable. Immediate Media Company Bristol Limited’s decision is final and no correspondence relating to the competition will be entered into. The winners will be notified by post within 20 days of the close of the competition. The name and county of residence of the winners will be published in the magazine within two months of the closing date. If the winner is unable to be contacted within one month of the closing date, Immediate Media Company Bristol Limited reserves the right to offer the prize to a runner-up. Immediate Media Company Bristol Limited reserves the right to amend these terms and conditions or to cancel, alter or amend the promotion at any stage, if deemed necessary in its opinion, or if circumstances arise outside of its control. The promotion is subject to the laws of England.
103
SUBSCRIBE TODAY! 6 ISSUES FOR JUST £11.95
Every issue of BBC Earth is a thrilling journey of discovery packed with gripping storytelling covering everything from nature and science to the limitless expanses of space. Plus, spectacular photo essays on the people who live close to nature.
50% OFF
2 EASY WAYS TO SUBSCRIBE Call now on 01293 312 135 and quote BBCESPHT317
Order online at bbcearthmagazine. com/BBCESPHT317
LOOKING FOR A GIFT IDEA?
A GIFT SUBSCRIPTION
is the perfect present that lasts all year round! Terms and conditions: *Offer only available to UK residents paying by Direct Debit. Offer valid until 30 April 2017. Your subscription will start from the next available issue. After your first 6 issues, your subscription will continue at £16.76 every 6 issues, saving 30% on the shop price. Telephone order line is open weekdays 9am-5pm.
NEXT MONTH MAGAZINE
MAY ISSUE ON SALE 27 APRIL 2017
EDITORIAL Editorr Rob Attar [emailprotected] Deputy editorr Charlotte Hodgman Reviews editorr Matt Elton [emailprotected] Production editorr Spencer Mizen Picture editorr Samantha Nott [emailprotected] Art editorr Susanne Frank Senior deputy art editor Rachel Dickens Deputy art editors Rosemary Smith, Sarah Lambert Picture researcherr Katherine Hallett Acting digital editorr Elinor Evans [emailprotected] Website assistantt Ellie Cawthorne
GETTY/BRIDGEMAN/ALAMY
Vol 18 No 4 –April 2017 BBC History Magazinee is published by Immediate Media Company Bristol Limited under licence from BBC Worldwide who help fund new BBC programmes. BBC History Magazine was established to publish authoritative history, written by leading experts, in an accessible and attractive format. We seek to maintain the high journalistic standards traditionally associated with the BBC. ADVERTISING & MARKETING Group advertising manager Tom Drew Advertising manager Sam Jones 0117 300 8145 [emailprotected] Brand sales executives Sam Evanson 0117 314 8754 [emailprotected] Kate Chetwynd 0117 300 8532 [emailprotected] Classified sales executive George Bent 0117 300 8542 [emailprotected] Group direct marketing manager Laurence Robertson 00353 5787 57444 Subscriptions director Jacky Perales-Morris Senior direct marketing executive Natalie Lawrence US representative Kate Buckley [emailprotected] PRESS AND PUBLIC RELATIONS Press officerr Dominic Lobley 020 7150 5015 [emailprotected] SYNDICATION Director of licensing & syndication Tim Hudson International partners’ manager Anna Brown PRODUCTION Production directorr Sarah Powell Production co-ordinatorr Emily Mounter Ad co-ordinatorr Jade O’Halloran Ad designerr James Croft IMMEDIATE MEDIA COMPANY Publisher David Musgrove Publishing director Andy Healy Managing directorr Andy Marshall CEO Tom Bureau BBC WORLDWIDE Director of editorial governance Nicholas Brett Director of consumer products and publishing Andrew Moultrie Head of UK publishing Chris Kerwin Publisher Mandy Thwaites Publishing co-ordinatorr Eva Abramik [emailprotected] www.bbcworldwide.com/uk--anz/ ukpublishing.aspx
ADVISORY PANEL Dr Padma Anagol Cardiff University – Prof Joanna Bourke Birkbeck College, London – Prof Richard Carwardine Oxford University – Dominic Crossley-Holland Executive Producer, Factual, BBC* – Prof Clive Emsley Open University – Prof Richard Evans Cambridge University – Prof Sarah Foott Oxford University – Prof Rab Houston St Andrews University – Prof John Hudson St Andrews University – Dr Peter Jones formerly Newcastle University – Prof Denis Judd London Metropolitan University – Prof Sir Ian Kershaw formerly Sheffield University – Robert Ketteridge Head of Documentaries, Factual, BBC* – Christopher Lee formerly Cambridge University – Prof John Morrill Cambridge University – Greg Neale Founding editor, BBC History Magazinee – Prof Kenneth O Morgan Oxford University – Prof Cormac ó Gráda University College, Dublin – Prof Martin Pugh formerly Newcastle University – Julian Richards archaeologist and broadcaster – Prof Simon Schama Columbia University – Prof Mark Stoyle University of Southampton – Dr Amanda Goodrich The Open University* – Dr Simon Thurley formerly chief executive, English Heritage – Prof Helen Weinstein Director of IPUP, Institute for the Public Understanding of the Past* – Michael Wood historian and broadcaster *member of BBC Editorial Advisory Board © Immediate Media Company Bristol Limited, 2017 – ISSN: 1469 8552 Not for resale. All rights reserved. Unauthorised reproduction in whole or part is prohibited without written permission. Every effort has been made to secure permission for copyright material. In the event of any material being used inadvertently, or where it proved impossible to trace the copyright owner, acknowledgement will be made in a future issue. MSS, photographs and artwork are accepted on the basis that BBC History Magazinee and its agents do not accept liability for loss or damage to same. Views expressed are not necessarily those of the publisher. We abide by IPSO’s rules and regulations. To give feedback about our magazines, please visit immediate.co.uk, k email [emailprotected] or write to Katherine Conlon, Immediate Media Co., Vineyard House, 44 Brook Green, London W6 7BT.
Peter Marshall on why the religious changes in Tudor England were far from peaceful Guernica Paul Preston revisits one of the most notorious moments of the Spanish Civil War
The battle of Lincoln Thomas Asbridge reveals how an Anglo-French clash in 1217 changed the face of England
Immediate Media Company is working to ensure that all of its paper is sourced from well-managed forests. This magazine can be recycled, for use in newspapers and packaging. Please remove any gifts, samples or wrapping and dispose of it at your local collection point.
Jan–Dec 2016
July 2015– June 2016
97,550
333,000
BBC History Magazine
The bloody Reformation
The real Arthur T Guy y Halsall considers the e evidence for the lege endary British king
105
My history hero “Growing up, there weren’t many role models for a girl like me and she was an inspirational figure. She was an absolute pioneer in so many ways”
TV presenter and entrepreneur Saira Khan chooses
Benazir Bhutto 1953-2007 Benazir Bhutto on the campaign trail in December 2007, the same month that she was assassinated
B
enazir Bhutto served two terms as prime minister of Pakistan, from 1988–90 and 1993–96. The eldest daughter of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who also served as prime minister, she was the first woman to become head of state of a Muslim nation. Born in Karachi, she was educated at Harvard and Oxford, but was later jailed for five years by her father’s political opponents. As prime minister, she pushed forward Pakistan’s atomic weapons programme, but her two terms of office both ended with her being dismissed by the Pakistani president for alleged corruption. After a number of assassination attempts, she was killed in 2007, the victim of an apparent suicide bomb attack.
What was her finest hour?
Just before she was assassinated in December 2007. Despite the fact that there had already been several attempts on her life and she knew the risks, she came out of exile and returned to Pakistan to campaign for the January 2008 elections in the hope of becoming prime minister again. Tragically, as she waved to the crowds from her car after a campaign rally, a shot fired out and explosives were detonated, killing her. For her to put herself in mortal danger, even though she was a mother by this point, demonstrates the amazing courage of the woman. It also reflects the duty she felt to the Pakistani people. Is there anything that you don’t admire about her?
I must have been six or seven. My father left Pakistan for Britain not long before Zulfikar Ali Bhutto took power in the 1970s. Several years after he was executed, Benazir took over as leader of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) which her father had founded, and I remember my dad talking about her with such pride. What kind of person was she?
She was a formidable lady and she had an agenda: she wanted to right the wrongs that had been committed against her father. After his death, she decided she would never give up his ideals or his political cause. She was arrested a number of times, imprisoned and even put in solitary confinement. A lot of people would have been left broken by all that she went through, but she wouldn’t be intimidated. What made Bhutto a hero?
Growing up, there weren’t that many role models for a girl like me and she was an inspirational figure. She was the same colour as me, she came from the same background as me – she was Pakistani, and my roots are Pakistani – and she was standing up as a woman in a man’s world. And a man’s world in Pakistan is very different to a man’s world here in the west; Pakistan is quite a misogynistic society. She defied tradition and is proof that women can do things if they’re just given a chance. She was an absolute pioneer in so many ways.
106
As prime minister, I think she had a real chance to improve the lot of Pakistani women, and to put women’s rights on the political agenda. She missed the opportunity to do so which is a real shame. Isn’t she something of a polarising figure in her homeland?
Her second government was accused of corruption – but there’s always been corruption in Pakistani politics. She was no more or less corrupt than any other Pakistani politician, but I think there was more mud thrown at her because she was a woman. Can you see any parallels between her life and your own?
Like her, I have an agenda, although my agenda is about improving Muslim women’s rights here in Britain and raising issues like forced marriage and child abuse that a lot of people in the Muslim community here would rather I didn’t raise. But when people criticise me for doing so, I think, “If she did it, I can”, and just carry on... If you could meet Bhutto, what would you ask her?
I’d like to ask her what it was kept that kept her going as a woman and a mother through such adversity. Saira Khan was talking to York Membery Saira Khan is a regular presenter on ITV’s Loose Women. She was the runner-up on the first UK series of reality television show The Apprentice in 2005. Follow her on Twitter: @IamSairaKhan
BBC History Magazine
GETTY IMAGES/ALAMY
When did you first hear about Benazir Bhutto?
Mastering Tai Chi Taught by Professor David-Dorian Ross LECTURE TITLES
TIME O F
55%
The Path towards Mastery
3. Walking like a Cat
IL
off
DE
1.
2. Harmony Is the Ultimate Goal
PR
O
R
ED IT
R FE
LIM
INTERNATIONAL MASTER TAI CHI INSTRUCTOR
R BY 2 9 A
4. Mind over Muscles 5. Taming the Monkey Mind 6. The Bow and Arrow 7.
Practising in a Small Space
8. Hips and Waist: The Centre Is the Commander 9. Feet: Separate Empty from Full 10. Shoulders: Finding Reasons to Let Go 11. Inside Reflects the Outside 12. Chest, Posture, and the Natural Curve 13. Bring Out Your Flow 14. Transitions as Smooth as Silk 15. Legs to Arms: Connecting Upper and Lower 16. A Movable Meditation 17. Bouncing Away Conflict 18. The Peaceful Warrior 19. Qigong Breathing 20. Partners: The Whole Body Is the Hand 21. Five Stages of Mastery 22. Lotus Kick and Laughing Buddha 23. Conserve Your Energy
Master an Art That Improves Every Realm of Your Life
24. Another River to Cross
Mastering Tai Chi
Tai chi combines the pursuit of health and longevity, the martial practice of self-defence, and the lofty—but attainable—ideals of harmony and balance. The movements are designed to emphasise and improve your body’s natural, healthy posture, so that instead of struggling to perform strenuous motions, you playfully relax into a gentle flow, making tai chi accessible to everyone, regardless of your current level of physical fitness.
Course no. 1918 | 24 lectures (30 minutes/lecture)
Mastering Tai Chi is your invitation to step onto the path of greater health, strength, wisdom, and compassion. These 24 half-hour lessons, taught by International Master Tai Chi Instructor David-Dorian Ross, take you deeply into what is traditionally called tai chi chuan (taijiquan), while focusing on a routine known as the Yang-style 40-movement form. Bring the body you have, and step into a journey of personal mastery with an extraordinary course that can help you achieve new heights of mental and physical fitness.
DVD £54.99
Offer expires 29/04/17
THEGREATCOURSES.CO.UK/9 UKHM 0800 298 9796
SAVE £30 +£2.99 Postage and Packing
NOW £24.99
Priority Code: 143092
For over 25 years, The Great Courses has brought the world’s foremost educators to millions who want to go deeper into the subjects that matter most. No exams. No homework. Just a world of knowledge available any time, anywhere. Download or stream to your laptop or PC, or use our free apps for iPad, iPhone, Android, or Kindle Fire. Over 600 courses available at www.TheGreatCourses.co.uk. The Great Courses®, 2nd Floor, Mander House, Mander Centre Wolverhampton, WV1 3NH. Terms and conditions apply. See www.TheGreatCourses.co.uk for details.
100% RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY AND GREEN GAS
We’ve always supplied 100% renewable electricity, now we supply gas that does good too.
Choosing Good Energy for electricity and gas could reduce your personal carbon footprint by up to 50%. Just some of the reasons we’re ranked by Ethical Consumer as their No.1 green electricity supplier. Switch to kinder, greener, local energy for less than you think.
Call 0800 254 0000 goodenergy.co.uk/bh
Offer ends 30/06/2017 For full details of how we source our electricity visit: goodenergy.co.uk/source Calculations visit: goodenergy.co.uk/goodstats Green gas visit: goodenergy.co.uk/green-gas Gift card incentive terms visit: goodenergy.co.uk/terms-conditions
Quote ‘HIS0317’ when you switch to receive a £50 John Lewis gift card